These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38788700)

  • 1. Computed chest radiography for total body irradiation: image quality and clinical feasibility.
    Bouchez Q; Vandenbroucke D; Pittomvils G; Boterberg T; van Eijkeren M; Leblans P; Vanderstraeten B
    Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2024 Jun; 10(4):. PubMed ID: 38788700
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluating radiographic parameters for mobile chest computed radiography: phantoms, image quality and effective dose.
    Rill LN; Brateman L; Arreola M
    Med Phys; 2003 Oct; 30(10):2727-35. PubMed ID: 14596311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Correlation between the signal-to-noise ratio improvement factor (KSNR) and clinical image quality for chest imaging with a computed radiography system.
    Moore CS; Wood TJ; Saunderson JR; Beavis AW
    Phys Med Biol; 2015 Dec; 60(23):9047-58. PubMed ID: 26540441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Optimal beam quality for chest computed radiography.
    Oda N; Nakata H; Murakami S; Terada K; Nakamura K; Yoshida A
    Invest Radiol; 1996 Mar; 31(3):126-31. PubMed ID: 8675419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of scatter rejection and low-contrast performance of scan equalization digital radiography (SEDR), slot-scan digital radiography, and full-field digital radiography systems for chest phantom imaging.
    Liu X; Shaw CC; Lai CJ; Wang T
    Med Phys; 2011 Jan; 38(1):23-33. PubMed ID: 21361171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Visual grading analysis of digital neonatal chest phantom X-ray images: Impact of detector type, dose and image processing on image quality.
    Smet MH; Breysem L; Mussen E; Bosmans H; Marshall NW; Cockmartin L
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Jul; 28(7):2951-2959. PubMed ID: 29460076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of clinical and physical measures of image quality in chest and pelvis computed radiography at different tube voltages.
    Sandborg M; Tingberg A; Ullman G; Dance DR; Alm Carlsson G
    Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4169-75. PubMed ID: 17153395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Image-guided total-body irradiation with a movable electronic portal imaging device for bone marrow transplant conditioning.
    Dipasquale G; Miralbell R; Lamanna G; Nouet P; Montero M; Rouzaud M; Zilli T
    Z Med Phys; 2020 May; 30(2):148-154. PubMed ID: 31787455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dose-image quality optimisation in digital chest radiography.
    Doyle P; Martin CJ; Gentle D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):269-72. PubMed ID: 15933120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development of a chest digital tomosynthesis R/F system and implementation of low-dose GPU-accelerated compressed sensing (CS) image reconstruction.
    Choi S; Lee H; Lee D; Choi S; Lee CL; Kwon W; Shin J; Seo CW; Kim HJ
    Med Phys; 2018 May; 45(5):1871-1888. PubMed ID: 29500855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Computed radiography dual energy subtraction: performance evaluation when detecting low-contrast lung nodules in an anthropomorphic phantom.
    Kimme-Smith C; Davis DL; McNitt-Gray M; Goldin J; Hart E; Batra P; Johnson TD
    J Digit Imaging; 1999 Feb; 12(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 10036665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Direct detector radiography versus dual reading computed radiography: feasibility of dose reduction in chest radiography.
    Gruber M; Uffmann M; Weber M; Prokop M; Balassy C; Schaefer-Prokop C
    Eur Radiol; 2006 Jul; 16(7):1544-50. PubMed ID: 16404566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Investigation of optimum energies for chest imaging using film-screen and computed radiography.
    Honey ID; Mackenzie A; Evans DS
    Br J Radiol; 2005 May; 78(929):422-7. PubMed ID: 15845936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Radiation Dose Comparison Between 70 kVp and 100 kVp With Spectral Beam Shaping for Non-Contrast-Enhanced Pediatric Chest Computed Tomography: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study.
    Weis M; Henzler T; Nance JW; Haubenreisser H; Meyer M; Sudarski S; Schoenberg SO; Neff KW; Hagelstein C
    Invest Radiol; 2017 Mar; 52(3):155-162. PubMed ID: 27662576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ultra-low dose chest computed tomography: Effect of iterative reconstruction levels on image quality.
    Afadzi M; Lysvik EK; Andersen HK; Martinsen ACT
    Eur J Radiol; 2019 May; 114():62-68. PubMed ID: 31005179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dose reduction with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction for paediatric CT: phantom study and clinical experience on chest and abdomen CT.
    Gay F; Pavia Y; Pierrat N; Lasalle S; Neuenschwander S; Brisse HJ
    Eur Radiol; 2014 Jan; 24(1):102-11. PubMed ID: 23995879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparative study based on image quality and clinical task performance for CT reconstruction algorithms in radiotherapy.
    Li H; Dolly S; Chen HC; Anastasio MA; Low DA; Li HH; Michalski JM; Thorstad WL; Gay H; Mutic S
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 17(4):377-390. PubMed ID: 27455472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Correlation of the clinical and physical image quality in chest radiography for average adults with a computed radiography imaging system.
    Moore CS; Wood TJ; Beavis AW; Saunderson JR
    Br J Radiol; 2013 Jul; 86(1027):20130077. PubMed ID: 23568362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Comparison of four digital and one conventional radiographic image systems for the chest in a patient study with subsequent system optimization].
    Redlich U; Hoeschen C; Effenberger O; Fessel A; Preuss H; Reissberg S; Scherlach C; Döhring W
    Rofo; 2005 Feb; 177(2):272-8. PubMed ID: 15666237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of reduced exposure on computed radiography: comparison of nodule detection accuracy with conventional and asymmetric screen-film radiographs of a chest phantom.
    Kimme-Smith C; Aberle DR; Sayre JW; Hart EM; Greaves SM; Brown K; Young DA; Deseran MD; Johnson T; Johnson SL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):269-73. PubMed ID: 7618538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.