BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38789622)

  • 1. Comparison of a robotic surgery program for rectal cancer: short- and long-term results from a comparative, retrospective study between two laparoscopic and robotic reference centers.
    Rogier-Mouzelas F; Piquard A; Karam E; Dussart D; Michot N; Saint-Marc O; Thebault B; Artus A; Bucur P; Pabst-Giger U; Salame E; Ouaissi M
    Surg Endosc; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38789622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer after Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy: Case-Matched Study of Short-Term Outcomes.
    Kim YS; Kim MJ; Park SC; Sohn DK; Kim DY; Chang HJ; Nam BH; Oh JH
    Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Jan; 48(1):225-31. PubMed ID: 25779367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is the learning curve of robotic low anterior resection shorter than laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer?: a comparative analysis of clinicopathologic outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic surgeries.
    Park EJ; Kim CW; Cho MS; Kim DW; Min BS; Baik SH; Lee KY; Kim NK
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2014 Nov; 93(25):e109. PubMed ID: 25437022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative analysis of short-term outcomes and oncological results between robotic-assisted and laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer by multiple surgeon implementation: a propensity score-matched analysis.
    Barzola E; Cornejo L; Gómez N; Pigem A; Julià D; Ortega N; Delisau O; Bobb KA; Farrés R; Planellas P
    J Robot Surg; 2023 Dec; 17(6):3013-3023. PubMed ID: 37924415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Simultaneous development of laparoscopy and robotics provides acceptable perioperative outcomes and shows robotics to have a faster learning curve and to be overall faster in rectal cancer surgery: analysis of novice MIS surgeon learning curves.
    Melich G; Hong YK; Kim J; Hur H; Baik SH; Kim NK; Sender Liberman A; Min BS
    Surg Endosc; 2015 Mar; 29(3):558-68. PubMed ID: 25030474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Efficacy comparison between robot-assisted and laparoscopic surgery for mid-low rectal cancer: a prospective randomized controlled trial].
    Tang B; Gao GM; Zou Z; Liu DN; Tang C; Jiang QG; Lei X; Li TY
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Apr; 23(4):377-383. PubMed ID: 32306606
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Low Anterior Resection: Equivalent Survival in a National Analysis of 14,033 Patients With Rectal Cancer.
    Sun Z; Kim J; Adam MA; Nussbaum DP; Speicher PJ; Mantyh CR; Migaly J
    Ann Surg; 2016 Jun; 263(6):1152-8. PubMed ID: 26501702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Results of laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal adenocarcinoma: retrospective analysis of 157 cases.
    Pugliese R; Di Lernia S; Sansonna F; Scandroglio I; Maggioni D; Ferrari GC; Costanzi A; Magistro C; De Carli S
    Am J Surg; 2008 Feb; 195(2):233-8. PubMed ID: 18083137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Diagnostic Nomogram for Predicting the Risk of Anastomotic Leakage in Elderly Patients With Rectal Cancer: A Single-center Retrospective Cohort Study.
    Liu D; Zhou H; Liu L; Zhu Z; Liu S; Fang Y
    Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2021 Jul; 31(6):734-741. PubMed ID: 34292209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Feasibility and safety of minimally invasive multivisceral resection for T4b rectal cancer: A 9-year review.
    Chan KS; Liu B; Tan MNA; How KY; Wong KY
    World J Gastrointest Surg; 2024 Mar; 16(3):777-789. PubMed ID: 38577068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multicentre propensity score-matched analysis of laparoscopic versus open surgery for T4 rectal cancer.
    de'Angelis N; Landi F; Vitali GC; Memeo R; Martínez-Pérez A; Solis A; Assalino M; Vallribera F; Mercoli HA; Marescaux J; Mutter D; Ris F; Espin E; Brunetti F
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Aug; 31(8):3106-3121. PubMed ID: 27826780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. What have we gained by performing robotic rectal resection? Evaluation of 64 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic or robotic low anterior resection for rectal adenocarcinoma.
    Erguner I; Aytac E; Boler DE; Atalar B; Baca B; Karahasanoglu T; Hamzaoglu I; Uras C
    Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2013 Jun; 23(3):316-9. PubMed ID: 23752000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of the short-term efficacy of two types of robotic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.
    Lei Y; Jiang J; Zhu S; Yi B; Li J
    Tech Coloproctol; 2022 Jan; 26(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 34846614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison between robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery and traditional laparoscopic low anterior resection for middle and low rectal cancer: A propensity score matching analysis.
    Feng Q; Ng SSM; Zhang Z; Lin S; Niu Z; Wei Y; He G; Chang W; Zhu D; Xu J
    J Surg Oncol; 2021 Sep; 124(4):607-618. PubMed ID: 34076898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A novel training program: laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted low anterior resection for rectal cancer can be trained simultaneously.
    Wang Y; Wen D; Zhang C; Wang Z; Zhang J
    Front Oncol; 2023; 13():1169932. PubMed ID: 37441427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for middle and low rectal cancer (REAL): short-term outcomes of a multicentre randomised controlled trial.
    Feng Q; Yuan W; Li T; Tang B; Jia B; Zhou Y; Zhang W; Zhao R; Zhang C; Cheng L; Zhang X; Liang F; He G; Wei Y; Xu J;
    Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2022 Nov; 7(11):991-1004. PubMed ID: 36087608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparing incidence of enterocolitis after laparoscopic and open low anterior resection for stage II/III rectal cancer.
    Inomata M; Kusano T; Etoh T; Akagi T; Shibata T; Ueda Y; Tojigamori M; Shiroshita H; Noguchi T; Shiraishi N; Kitano S
    Asian J Endosc Surg; 2014 Aug; 7(3):214-21. PubMed ID: 24690093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Effect of peritoneum reconstruction on postoperative complications after laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer].
    Gao LF; Chen DL; Chen BY; Li C; Wang XS; Yu PW; Tang B
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2021 Dec; 24(12):1079-1085. PubMed ID: 34923791
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Robotic versus laparoscopic rectal resection for sphincter-saving surgery: pathological and short-term outcomes in a single-center analysis of 130 consecutive patients.
    Valverde A; Goasguen N; Oberlin O; Svrcek M; Fléjou JF; Sezeur A; Mosnier H; Houdart R; Lupinacci RM
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Oct; 31(10):4085-4091. PubMed ID: 28271268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Long-term oncologic outcomes of robotic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a comparative study with laparoscopic surgery.
    Park EJ; Cho MS; Baek SJ; Hur H; Min BS; Baik SH; Lee KY; Kim NK
    Ann Surg; 2015 Jan; 261(1):129-37. PubMed ID: 24662411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.