These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38789842)

  • 1. Epistemic Trust in Scientific Experts: A Moral Dimension.
    Barimah GK
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2024 May; 30(3):21. PubMed ID: 38789842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Children's Judgments of Epistemic and Moral Agents: From Situations to Intentions.
    Koenig MA; Tiberius V; Hamlin JK
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2019 May; 14(3):344-360. PubMed ID: 30629887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The role of non-epistemic values in engineering models.
    Diekmann S; Peterson M
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2013 Mar; 19(1):207-18. PubMed ID: 21822897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Epistemic Equality: Distributive Epistemic Justice in the Context of Justification.
    Miller B; Pinto M
    Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2022; 32(2):173-203. PubMed ID: 35815504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Abolishing morality in biomedical ethics.
    Crutchfield P; Scheall S
    Bioethics; 2024 May; 38(4):316-325. PubMed ID: 38367255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Epistemic values and the Big Five: Personality characteristics of those who ascribe personal and moral value to epistemic rationality.
    Ståhl T; Turner J
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(10):e0258228. PubMed ID: 34610048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ignorance and moral judgment: Testing the logical priority of the epistemic.
    Crutchfield P; Scheall S; Justin Rzeszutek M; Dawn Brown H; Cardoso Sao Mateus C
    Conscious Cogn; 2023 Feb; 108():103472. PubMed ID: 36724707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contesting epistemic authority: Conspiracy theories on the boundaries of science.
    Harambam J; Aupers S
    Public Underst Sci; 2015 May; 24(4):466-80. PubMed ID: 25452381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Communication about distress and well-being: Epistemic and ethical considerations.
    White RG; Fay R; Chiumento A; Giurgi-Oncu C; Phipps A
    Transcult Psychiatry; 2022 Aug; 59(4):413-424. PubMed ID: 35300551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The epistemic costs of compromise in bioethics.
    Devolder K; Douglas T
    Bioethics; 2018 Feb; 32(2):111-118. PubMed ID: 29280164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Expert identification for ethics expertise informed by feminist epistemology-Using awareness of biases and situated ignorance as an indicator of trustworthiness.
    Gauckler C
    Bioethics; 2023 Jul; 37(6):523-532. PubMed ID: 35920062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Value-entanglement and the integrity of scientific research.
    Resnik DB; Elliott KC
    Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2019 Jun; 75():1-11. PubMed ID: 31426942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Epistemic Trust as an Interactional Accomplishment in Pediatric Well-Child Visits: Parents' Resistance to Solicited Advice as Performing Epistemic Vigilance.
    Caronia L; Ranzani F
    Health Commun; 2024 Apr; 39(4):838-851. PubMed ID: 36967666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Drawing lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic: science and epistemic humility should go together.
    Mazzocchi F
    Hist Philos Life Sci; 2021 Jul; 43(3):92. PubMed ID: 34327593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evoking vigilance: Would you (dis)trust a scientist who discusses ethical implications of research in a science blog?
    Hendriks F; Kienhues D; Bromme R
    Public Underst Sci; 2016 Nov; 25(8):992-1008. PubMed ID: 27150266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Why the Epistemic Objection Against Using Sentience as Criterion of Moral Status is Flawed.
    Dung L
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2022 Oct; 28(6):51. PubMed ID: 36305975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Moral conviction: A challenge in the age of science politicization.
    Bayes R
    Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci; 2022; 188(1):195-214. PubMed ID: 35168743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Are Pseudonyms Ethical in (Science) Publishing? Neuroskeptic as a Case Study.
    Teixeira da Silva JA
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2017 Dec; 23(6):1807-1810. PubMed ID: 27830481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fairness in Knowing: Science Communication and Epistemic Justice.
    Medvecky F
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Oct; 24(5):1393-1408. PubMed ID: 28939945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Lying to recommend unqualified friends: Diverging implications for interpersonal and epistemic trust inferences.
    Shao S; Heyman GD
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2024 May; 241():105866. PubMed ID: 38367352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.