These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38789842)

  • 21. Measuring Laypeople's Trust in Experts in a Digital Age: The Muenster Epistemic Trustworthiness Inventory (METI).
    Hendriks F; Kienhues D; Bromme R
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0139309. PubMed ID: 26474078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Investigating Trust, Expertise, and Epistemic Injustice in Chronic Pain.
    Buchman DZ; Ho A; Goldberg DS
    J Bioeth Inq; 2017 Mar; 14(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 28005251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The Effects of Epistemic Trust and Social Trust on Public Acceptance of Genetically Modified Food: An Empirical Study from China.
    Hu L; Liu R; Zhang W; Zhang T
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Oct; 17(20):. PubMed ID: 33096931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Epistemic Blame and the Normativity of Evidence.
    Schmidt S
    Erkenntnis; 2021 Jun; ():1-24. PubMed ID: 34149123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Distributing epistemic and practical risks: a comparative study of communicating earthquake damages.
    Yu LA
    Synthese; 2022; 200(5):360. PubMed ID: 36032353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Epistemic neighbors: trespassing and the range of expert authority.
    Watson JC
    Synthese; 2022; 200(5):408. PubMed ID: 36189430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. AI-Inclusivity in Healthcare: Motivating an Institutional Epistemic Trust Perspective.
    Maheshwari K; Jedan C; Christiaans I; van Gijn M; Maeckelberghe E; Plantinga M
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2024 Apr; ():1-15. PubMed ID: 38682483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Faultless responsibility: on the nature and allocation of moral responsibility for distributed moral actions.
    Floridi L
    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2016 Dec; 374(2083):. PubMed ID: 28336791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Epistemic trust, epistemic responsibility, and medical practice.
    Schwab AP
    J Med Philos; 2008 Aug; 33(4):302-20. PubMed ID: 18662947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A role for epistemic trust in speech-language pathology: A tutorial paper.
    Clarke A; Meredith PJ; Rose TA; Daubney M
    J Commun Disord; 2018; 72():54-63. PubMed ID: 29471178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The moral, epistemic, and mindreading components of children's vigilance towards deception.
    Mascaro O; Sperber D
    Cognition; 2009 Sep; 112(3):367-80. PubMed ID: 19540473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The epistemic integrity of scientific research.
    De Winter J; Kosolosky L
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2013 Sep; 19(3):757-74. PubMed ID: 23054672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Simulation as an ethical imperative and epistemic responsibility for the implementation of medical guidelines in health care.
    Garbayo L; Stahl J
    Med Health Care Philos; 2017 Mar; 20(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 27497698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Seeking evidence and explanation signals religious and scientific commitments.
    Gill M; Lombrozo T
    Cognition; 2023 Sep; 238():105496. PubMed ID: 37385152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. When do non-epistemic values play an epistemically illegitimate role in science? How to solve one half of the new demarcation problem.
    Reutlinger A
    Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2022 Apr; 92():152-161. PubMed ID: 35182965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Co-author responsibility: Distinguishing between the moral and epistemic aspects of trust.
    Andersen H
    EMBO Rep; 2014 Sep; 15(9):914-8. PubMed ID: 25114099
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Bioethics and epistemic-moral hybrids: perspectives from the history of science.
    Potthast T
    Biomed Ethics; 2000; 5(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 11905468
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Science, politics and regulation: The trust-based approach to the demarcation problem.
    John S
    Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2021 Dec; 90():1-9. PubMed ID: 34500262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Are moral philosophers moral experts?
    Gesang B
    Bioethics; 2010 May; 24(4):153-9. PubMed ID: 20394108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Scientific progress: Knowledge versus understanding.
    Dellsén F
    Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2016 Apr; 56():72-83. PubMed ID: 27083086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.