These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38792939)

  • 61. Clinical evaluation of a medium-filled flowable restorative material as a pit and fissure sealant.
    Autio-Gold JT
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):325-9. PubMed ID: 12120768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Comparative evaluation of marginal integrity of glass ionomer and resin based fissure sealants using invasive and non-invasive techniques: an in vitro study.
    Gunjal S; Nagesh L; Raju HG
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(3):320-5. PubMed ID: 23059566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Clinical effectiveness of resin-modified glass ionomer-based fluoride varnish for preventing occlusal caries lesions in partially erupted permanent molars: A randomised active-controlled trial.
    Uchil SR; Suprabha BS; Shenoy R; Rao A
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2022 May; 32(3):314-323. PubMed ID: 34379856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Fuji III vs. Fuji VII glass ionomer sealants--a clinical study.
    Kamala BK; Hegde AM
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2008; 33(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 19093648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. [Caries prevention effect of resin based sealants and glass ionomor sealants].
    Liu Y; Rong W; Zhao X; Wang M; Jiang Q; Wang W
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Apr; 49(4):199-203. PubMed ID: 24969592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Low-cost glass ionomer cement as ART sealant in permanent molars: a randomized clinical trial.
    Hesse D; Bonifácio CC; Guglielmi Cde A; Franca Cd; Mendes FM; Raggio DP
    Braz Oral Res; 2015; 29():. PubMed ID: 26039906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Frequency of remnants of sealants left behind in pits and fissures of occlusal surfaces after 2 and 3 years.
    Hu X; Zhang W; Fan M; Mulder J; Frencken JE
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Jan; 21(1):143-149. PubMed ID: 26961522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Microleakage, adaptation ability and clinical efficacy of two fluoride releasing fissure sealants.
    Marković D; Petrović B; Perić T; Blagojević D
    Vojnosanit Pregl; 2012 Apr; 69(4):320-5. PubMed ID: 22624423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Clinical comparison of a flowable composite and fissure sealant: a 24-month split-mouth, randomized, and controlled study.
    Erdemir U; Sancakli HS; Yaman BC; Ozel S; Yucel T; Yıldız E
    J Dent; 2014 Feb; 42(2):149-57. PubMed ID: 24296163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Bioactive self-etching sealant on newly erupted molars: A split-mouth clinical trial.
    Penha KJS; Roma FRVO; Filho EMM; Ribeiro CCC; Firoozmand LM
    J Dent; 2021 Dec; 115():103857. PubMed ID: 34699954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Caries-preventive effect of fissure sealants: a systematic review.
    Mejàre I; Lingström P; Petersson LG; Holm AK; Twetman S; Källestål C; Nordenram G; Lagerlöf F; Söder B; Norlund A; Axelsson S; Dahlgren H
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2003 Dec; 61(6):321-30. PubMed ID: 14960003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Strong evidence for the effectiveness of resin based sealants.
    Deery C
    Evid Based Dent; 2013 Sep; 14(3):69-70. PubMed ID: 24071670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. A three-year follow-up of glass ionomer cement and resin fissure sealants.
    Karlzén-Reuterving G; van Dijken JW
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1995; 62(2):108-10. PubMed ID: 7608367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. A cost minimisation analysis of two dental sealing methods in an outreach dental program.
    Liu B; Wang W
    J Dent; 2021 Jul; 110():103687. PubMed ID: 33961937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Glass ionomer ART sealants in Chinese school children-6-year results.
    Holmgren CJ; Lo EC; Hu D
    J Dent; 2013 Sep; 41(9):764-70. PubMed ID: 23831419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Clinical evaluation of three different materials used as pit and fissure sealant: 24-months results.
    Pardi V; Pereira AC; Ambrosano GM; Meneghim Mde C
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2005; 29(2):133-7. PubMed ID: 15719917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. The state-of-the-art of ART sealants.
    Frencken JE
    Dent Update; 2014 Mar; 41(2):119-20, 122-4. PubMed ID: 24783880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Split-mouth Randomised Clinical Trial on the Efficacy of GIC Sealant on Occlusal Surfaces of Primary Second Molar.
    Joshi S; Sandhu M; Sogi HPS; Garg S; Dhindsa A
    Oral Health Prev Dent; 2019; 17(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 30793118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Randomized, controlled trial comparing the retention of a flowable restorative system with a conventional resin sealant: one-year follow up.
    Corona SA; Borsatto MC; Garcia L; Ramos RP; Palma-Dibb RG
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2005 Jan; 15(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 15663444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Two-year clinical study on postoperative pulpal complications arising from the absence of a glass-ionomer lining in deep occlusal resin-composite restorations.
    Banomyong D; Messer H
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2013 Nov; 4(4):265-70. PubMed ID: 23355492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.