These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38794914)
1. Comparison of shock absorption capacities of three types of mouthguards: A comparative in vitro study. Yohan A; Aurélie B; Laurent T; Baptiste S; Sylvain P; Jean-Pierre A; Christophe RB Dent Traumatol; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38794914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of different materials for conventional and 3D-printed models on the mechanical properties of ethylene-vinyl acetate utilized for fabricating custom-fit mouthguards. Rondón AKA; Lozada MIT; Soares PBF; Raposo LHA; Soares CJ Dent Traumatol; 2024 Jun; 40(3):281-288. PubMed ID: 37997541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Comparative Study of Shock Absorption Capacities of Custom Fabricated Mouthguards using a Triangulation Sensor. Sarac R; Helbig J; Dräger J; Jost-Brinkmann PG Materials (Basel); 2019 Oct; 12(21):. PubMed ID: 31661939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Does hard insertion and space improve shock absorption ability of mouthguard? Takeda T; Ishigami K; Handa J; Naitoh K; Kurokawa K; Shibusawa M; Nakajima K; Kawamura S Dent Traumatol; 2006 Apr; 22(2):77-82. PubMed ID: 16499630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Shock absorption capacities of mouthguards in different types and thicknesses. Bemelmanns P; Pfeiffer P Int J Sports Med; 2001 Feb; 22(2):149-53. PubMed ID: 11281619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative evaluation of shock absorption ability of custom-fit mouthguards with new-generation polyolefin self-adapting mouthguards in three different maxillary anterior teeth alignments using Fiber Bragg Grating (FBG) sensors. Grewal N; Kumari F; Tiwari U Dent Traumatol; 2015 Aug; 31(4):294-301. PubMed ID: 25425316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Custom-made mouthguards and prevention of orofacial injuries in sports]. Badel T; Jerolimov V; Pandurić J; Carek V Acta Med Croatica; 2007; 61 Suppl 1():9-14. PubMed ID: 18949918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of the shock absorption capacities of different mouthguards. Bochnig MS; Oh MJ; Nagel T; Ziegler F; Jost-Brinkmann PG Dent Traumatol; 2017 Jun; 33(3):205-213. PubMed ID: 28231638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Adaptation and Biomechanical Performance of Custom-Fit Mouthguards Produced Using Conventional and Digital Workflows: A Comparative In Vitro Strain Analysis. Rondon AKA; Lozada MIT; Cordeiro IB; Bandeira PCJ; Levin L; Soares PBF; Soares CJ Dent Traumatol; 2024 Sep; ():. PubMed ID: 39258436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact behaviour of 3D printed cellular structures for mouthguard applications. Saunders J; Lißner M; Townsend D; Petrinic N; Bergmann J Sci Rep; 2022 Mar; 12(1):4020. PubMed ID: 35256721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Post thermoforming dimensional changes of ethylene vinyl acetate used in custom-made mouthguards for trauma prevention--a pilot study. Geary JL; Kinirons MJ Dent Traumatol; 2008 Jun; 24(3):350-5. PubMed ID: 18489484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mouthguards in sport activities : history, physical properties and injury prevention effectiveness. Knapik JJ; Marshall SW; Lee RB; Darakjy SS; Jones SB; Mitchener TA; delaCruz GG; Jones BH Sports Med; 2007; 37(2):117-44. PubMed ID: 17241103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Design of Customized Mouthguards with Superior Protection Using Digital-Based Technologies and Impact Tests. Nasrollahzadeh N; Pioletti DP; Broome M Sports Med Open; 2024 May; 10(1):64. PubMed ID: 38816564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. EVA mouthguards: how thick should they be? Westerman B; Stringfellow PM; Eccleston JA Dent Traumatol; 2002 Feb; 18(1):24-7. PubMed ID: 11841462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Custom-Fitted EVA Mouthguards: what is the ideal thickness? a dynamic finite element impact study. Verissimo C; Costa PV; Santos-Filho PC; Tantbirojn D; Versluis A; Soares CJ Dent Traumatol; 2016 Apr; 32(2):95-102. PubMed ID: 26310199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanical effects of a hard insert and air space in mouthguards on the shock absorption and protection against fractures of direct resin composite veneers from trauma. de Bragança GF; de Souza IF; Soares PBF; Soares CJ Dent Traumatol; 2023 Aug; 39(4):314-323. PubMed ID: 36938932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Characterization of mouthguards: Impact performance. Guérard S; Barou JL; Petit J; Poisson P Dent Traumatol; 2017 Aug; 33(4):281-287. PubMed ID: 28190286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of different ethylene-vinyl acetate brands used for custom-fitted mouthguard fabrication on the stress and strain during an impact. Firmiano TC; de Oliveira AA; Costa PVM; Cardoso LS; Pereira RD; Veríssimo C Dent Traumatol; 2022 Oct; 38(5):431-438. PubMed ID: 35278342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An investigation into the relationship between thickness variations and manufacturing techniques of mouthguards. Farrington T; Coward T; Onambele-Pearson G; Taylor RL; Earl P; Winwood K Dent Traumatol; 2016 Feb; 32(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 26095259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Forces transmitted through EVA mouthguard materials of different types and thickness. Westerman B; Stringfellow PM; Eccleston JA Aust Dent J; 1995 Dec; 40(6):389-91. PubMed ID: 8615745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]