114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38795543)
1. Recommendation of minimal distal tibial length for long axis coordinate system definitions.
Muhlrad EP; Peterson AC; Anderson AM; Aragon KC; Lisonbee RJ; MacWilliams BA; Kruger KM; Lenz AL
J Biomech; 2024 Jun; 170():112153. PubMed ID: 38795543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Kinematics of the normal arch of the foot and ankle under physiologic loading.
Kitaoka HB; Lundberg A; Luo ZP; An KN
Foot Ankle Int; 1995 Aug; 16(8):492-9. PubMed ID: 8520662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Variability of extraarticular tibial rotation references for total knee arthroplasty.
Akagi M; Mori S; Nishimura S; Nishimura A; Asano T; Hamanishi C
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2005 Jul; (436):172-6. PubMed ID: 15995437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Statistical shape modeling of the talocrural joint using a hybrid multi-articulation joint approach.
Lenz AL; Krähenbühl N; Peterson AC; Lisonbee RJ; Hintermann B; Saltzman CL; Barg A; Anderson AE
Sci Rep; 2021 Apr; 11(1):7314. PubMed ID: 33795729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A tibial-based coordinate system for three-dimensional data.
Fitzpatrick C; FitzPatrick D; Auger D; Lee J
Knee; 2007 Mar; 14(2):133-7. PubMed ID: 17182247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ankle morphometry based on computerized tomography.
Claassen L; Luedtke P; Yao D; Ettinger S; Daniilidis K; Nowakowski AM; Mueller-Gerbl M; Stukenborg-Colsman C; Plaass C
Foot Ankle Surg; 2019 Oct; 25(5):674-678. PubMed ID: 30306892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Normative rearfoot motion during barefoot and shod walking using biplane fluoroscopy.
Campbell KJ; Wilson KJ; LaPrade RF; Clanton TO
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2016 Apr; 24(4):1402-8. PubMed ID: 24902926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The hindfoot alignment view.
Saltzman CL; el-Khoury GY
Foot Ankle Int; 1995 Sep; 16(9):572-6. PubMed ID: 8563927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A common reference frame for describing rotation of the distal femur: a ct-based kinematic study using cadavers.
Victor J; Van Doninck D; Labey L; Van Glabbeek F; Parizel P; Bellemans J
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2009 May; 91(5):683-90. PubMed ID: 19407308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Relationship between the tibial mechanical axis and bony anatomical landmarks of the calf and foot as measured on radiographs obtained with a new laser-calibrated position.
He P; Zhu Q; Zhang Z; Zou X; Xu D
J Xray Sci Technol; 2013; 21(4):497-506. PubMed ID: 24191987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Motion at the Tibial and Polyethylene Component Interface in a Mobile-Bearing Total Ankle Replacement.
Lundeen GA; Clanton TO; Dunaway LJ; Lu M
Foot Ankle Int; 2016 Aug; 37(8):848-54. PubMed ID: 27083506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The geometrical axis of the talocrural joint-Suggestions for a new measurement of the talocrural joint axis.
Claassen L; Luedtke P; Yao D; Ettinger S; Daniilidis K; Nowakowski AM; Mueller-Gerbl M; Stukenborg-Colsman C; Plaass C
Foot Ankle Surg; 2019 Jun; 25(3):371-377. PubMed ID: 30306891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Skeletal landmarks for TKR implantations: evaluation of their accuracy using EOS imaging acquisition system.
Schlatterer B; Suedhoff I; Bonnet X; Catonne Y; Maestro M; Skalli W
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2009 Feb; 95(1):2-11. PubMed ID: 19251231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Foot and ankle kinematics and ground reaction forces during ambulation.
Kitaoka HB; Crevoisier XM; Hansen D; Katajarvi B; Harbst K; Kaufman KR
Foot Ankle Int; 2006 Oct; 27(10):808-13. PubMed ID: 17054883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. New landmarks for ideal positioning of syndesmotic screw: a computerised tomography based analysis and radiographic simulation.
Kumar A; Passey J; Goel L; Chouhan D; Agnihotri A; Chauhan S; Gupta S; Khan R
Int Orthop; 2020 Apr; 44(4):665-675. PubMed ID: 31863161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The tibial lateral axis is a novel extraarticular landmark for detection of the tibial anteroposterior axis.
Hiranaka T; Tanaka T; Fujishiro T; Anjiki K; Nagata N; Kitazawa D; Kotoura K; Okamoto K
Surg Radiol Anat; 2020 Oct; 42(10):1195-1202. PubMed ID: 32514589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy and feasibility of high-speed dual fluoroscopy and model-based tracking to measure in vivo ankle arthrokinematics.
Wang B; Roach KE; Kapron AL; Fiorentino NM; Saltzman CL; Singer M; Anderson AE
Gait Posture; 2015 May; 41(4):888-93. PubMed ID: 25864769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ankle syndesmosis: a qualitative and quantitative anatomic analysis.
Williams BT; Ahrberg AB; Goldsmith MT; Campbell KJ; Shirley L; Wijdicks CA; LaPrade RF; Clanton TO
Am J Sports Med; 2015 Jan; 43(1):88-97. PubMed ID: 25361858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Consideration of digitization precision when building local coordinate axes for a foot model.
Brown KM; Bursey DE; Arneson LJ; Andrews CA; Ludewig PM; Glasoe WM
J Biomech; 2009 Jun; 42(9):1263-9. PubMed ID: 19375706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. CT scanning of the foot and ankle: 1. Normal anatomy.
Solomon MA; Gilula LA; Oloff LM; Oloff J; Compton T
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1986 Jun; 146(6):1192-203. PubMed ID: 3486563
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
