BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38795714)

  • 1. Societal implications of the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization decision.
    Brindis CD; Laitner MH; Clayton EW; Scrimshaw SC; Grosz BJ; Simpson LA; Rosenbaum S; Brierley CL; Simon MA; Roubideaux Y; Calonge BN; Johnson PA; DeStefano L; Bear A; Arora KS; Dzau VJ
    Lancet; 2024 Jun; 403(10445):2751-2754. PubMed ID: 38795714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Health-care workforce implications of the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization decision.
    Brindis CD; Laitner MH; Clayton EW; Scrimshaw SC; Grosz BJ; Simpson LA; Rosenbaum S; Brierley CL; Simon MA; Roubideaux Y; Calonge BN; Johnson PA; DeStefano L; Bear A; Arora KS; Dzau VJ
    Lancet; 2024 Jun; 403(10445):2747-2750. PubMed ID: 38795713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Abortion Access for Women in Custody in the Wake of
    Herr A
    Am J Law Med; 2023 Dec; 49(4):471-492. PubMed ID: 38563269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Whole Women's Victory - or Not?
    Charo RA
    N Engl J Med; 2016 Sep; 375(9):809-11. PubMed ID: 27579630
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Legal Risks and Ethical Dilemmas for Clinicians in the Aftermath of Dobbs.
    Reingold RB; Gostin LO; Goodwin MB
    JAMA; 2022 Nov; 328(17):1695-1696. PubMed ID: 36318123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Addressing challenges related to the professional practice of abortion post-Roe.
    Chervenak FA; Moreno JD; McLeod-Sordjan R; Bornstein E; Katz A; Pollet SL; Combs A; De Four Jones M; Lewis D; Bachmann G; Gordon MR; Warman A; Grünebaum A
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2024 May; 230(5):532-539. PubMed ID: 37914062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Requests for Self-managed Medication Abortion Provided Using Online Telemedicine in 30 US States Before and After the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization Decision.
    Aiken ARA; Starling JE; Scott JG; Gomperts R
    JAMA; 2022 Nov; 328(17):1768-1770. PubMed ID: 36318139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. State Abortion Restrictions and the New Supreme Court: Women's Access to Reproductive Health Services.
    Reingold RB; Gostin LO
    JAMA; 2019 Jul; 322(1):21-22. PubMed ID: 31166573
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The supreme court and the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003: a political procedure replaces woman-centered care.
    Blumenthal PD; Winikoff B
    MedGenMed; 2007 Jun; 9(2):52. PubMed ID: 17955106
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Obstacles to Care Mount 1 Year After Dobbs Decision.
    Verma N; Grossman D
    JAMA; 2023 Jul; 330(2):119-120. PubMed ID: 37351896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tubal Sterilization Requests at a Single Institution Following the Supreme Court Decision to Overturn the Constitutional Right to Abortion.
    Liang AC; Gliwa C; Loder CM; Dalton VK; Smith RD
    JAMA; 2023 Jul; 330(4):374-375. PubMed ID: 37490094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Restricting Reasons: A New Battleground in Abortion Regulation.
    Will JF
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2020 Sep; 50(5):7-8. PubMed ID: 33095492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Provision of Medications for Self-Managed Abortion Before and After the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization Decision.
    Aiken ARA; Wells ES; Gomperts R; Scott JG
    JAMA; 2024 May; 331(18):1558-1564. PubMed ID: 38526865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Medication Abortion Through Telemedicine: Implications of a Ruling by the Iowa Supreme Court.
    Yang YT; Kozhimannil KB
    Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Feb; 127(2):313-6. PubMed ID: 26942359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Critical Analysis of
    Manninen BA
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2023 Jul; 32(3):357-367. PubMed ID: 36647699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Potential Effects of
    Hall TS
    Am J Law Med; 2023 Jul; 49(2-3):359-373. PubMed ID: 38344784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Access to abortion in the USA-the legal battle.
    Cleaver G
    Lancet; 2017 Jun; 389(10087):2361-2362. PubMed ID: 28635601
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Trends in Abortion- and Contraception-Related Internet Searches After the US Supreme Court Overturned Constitutional Abortion Rights: How Much Do State Laws Matter?
    Gupta S; Perry B; Simon K
    JAMA Health Forum; 2023 Apr; 4(4):e230518. PubMed ID: 37115538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of women in abortion jurisprudence: from Roe to Casey and beyond.
    Martin PA
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1993; 2(3):309-19. PubMed ID: 8293219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Court is ignoring science.
    Foster DG
    Science; 2022 May; 376(6595):779. PubMed ID: 35575724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.