These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38795714)

  • 1. Societal implications of the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization decision.
    Brindis CD; Laitner MH; Clayton EW; Scrimshaw SC; Grosz BJ; Simpson LA; Rosenbaum S; Brierley CL; Simon MA; Roubideaux Y; Calonge BN; Johnson PA; DeStefano L; Bear A; Arora KS; Dzau VJ
    Lancet; 2024 Jun; 403(10445):2751-2754. PubMed ID: 38795714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Health-care workforce implications of the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization decision.
    Brindis CD; Laitner MH; Clayton EW; Scrimshaw SC; Grosz BJ; Simpson LA; Rosenbaum S; Brierley CL; Simon MA; Roubideaux Y; Calonge BN; Johnson PA; DeStefano L; Bear A; Arora KS; Dzau VJ
    Lancet; 2024 Jun; 403(10445):2747-2750. PubMed ID: 38795713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Abortion Access for Women in Custody in the Wake of
    Herr A
    Am J Law Med; 2023 Dec; 49(4):471-492. PubMed ID: 38563269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Whole Women's Victory - or Not?
    Charo RA
    N Engl J Med; 2016 Sep; 375(9):809-11. PubMed ID: 27579630
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Legal Risks and Ethical Dilemmas for Clinicians in the Aftermath of Dobbs.
    Reingold RB; Gostin LO; Goodwin MB
    JAMA; 2022 Nov; 328(17):1695-1696. PubMed ID: 36318123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Addressing challenges related to the professional practice of abortion post-Roe.
    Chervenak FA; Moreno JD; McLeod-Sordjan R; Bornstein E; Katz A; Pollet SL; Combs A; De Four Jones M; Lewis D; Bachmann G; Gordon MR; Warman A; Grünebaum A
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2024 May; 230(5):532-539. PubMed ID: 37914062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Requests for Self-managed Medication Abortion Provided Using Online Telemedicine in 30 US States Before and After the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization Decision.
    Aiken ARA; Starling JE; Scott JG; Gomperts R
    JAMA; 2022 Nov; 328(17):1768-1770. PubMed ID: 36318139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. State Abortion Restrictions and the New Supreme Court: Women's Access to Reproductive Health Services.
    Reingold RB; Gostin LO
    JAMA; 2019 Jul; 322(1):21-22. PubMed ID: 31166573
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The supreme court and the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003: a political procedure replaces woman-centered care.
    Blumenthal PD; Winikoff B
    MedGenMed; 2007 Jun; 9(2):52. PubMed ID: 17955106
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Obstacles to Care Mount 1 Year After Dobbs Decision.
    Verma N; Grossman D
    JAMA; 2023 Jul; 330(2):119-120. PubMed ID: 37351896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tubal Sterilization Requests at a Single Institution Following the Supreme Court Decision to Overturn the Constitutional Right to Abortion.
    Liang AC; Gliwa C; Loder CM; Dalton VK; Smith RD
    JAMA; 2023 Jul; 330(4):374-375. PubMed ID: 37490094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Restricting Reasons: A New Battleground in Abortion Regulation.
    Will JF
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2020 Sep; 50(5):7-8. PubMed ID: 33095492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Medication Abortion Through Telemedicine: Implications of a Ruling by the Iowa Supreme Court.
    Yang YT; Kozhimannil KB
    Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Feb; 127(2):313-6. PubMed ID: 26942359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Provision of Medications for Self-Managed Abortion Before and After the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization Decision.
    Aiken ARA; Wells ES; Gomperts R; Scott JG
    JAMA; 2024 May; 331(18):1558-1564. PubMed ID: 38526865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Critical Analysis of
    Manninen BA
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2023 Jul; 32(3):357-367. PubMed ID: 36647699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Potential Effects of
    Hall TS
    Am J Law Med; 2023 Jul; 49(2-3):359-373. PubMed ID: 38344784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Access to abortion in the USA-the legal battle.
    Cleaver G
    Lancet; 2017 Jun; 389(10087):2361-2362. PubMed ID: 28635601
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Trends in Abortion- and Contraception-Related Internet Searches After the US Supreme Court Overturned Constitutional Abortion Rights: How Much Do State Laws Matter?
    Gupta S; Perry B; Simon K
    JAMA Health Forum; 2023 Apr; 4(4):e230518. PubMed ID: 37115538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of women in abortion jurisprudence: from Roe to Casey and beyond.
    Martin PA
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1993; 2(3):309-19. PubMed ID: 8293219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Court is ignoring science.
    Foster DG
    Science; 2022 May; 376(6595):779. PubMed ID: 35575724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.