These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38795714)
21. Abortion rights in the crosshairs: a transnational perspective on resistance strategies. Sutton B J Lesbian Stud; 2024; 28(3):525-532. PubMed ID: 36727605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Advancing Birth Equity in a Post-Dobbs US. Crear-Perry J; Hassan A; Daniel S JAMA; 2022 Nov; 328(17):1689-1690. PubMed ID: 36318120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Beyond Roe, after Casey: the present and future of a "fundamental" right. Benshoof J Womens Health Issues; 1993; 3(3):162-70. PubMed ID: 8274872 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Implications of the Federal Abortion Ban for Women's Health in the United States. Weitz TA; Yanow S Reprod Health Matters; 2008 May; 16(31 Suppl):99-107. PubMed ID: 18772090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The End of Roe v Wade and New Legal Frontiers on the Constitutional Right to Abortion. Cohen IG; Murray M; Gostin LO JAMA; 2022 Jul; 328(4):325-326. PubMed ID: 35802387 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. The Supreme Court and abortion rights. Annas GJ N Engl J Med; 2007 May; 356(21):2201-7. PubMed ID: 17476003 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Preparing for a post-Roe world. Minkoff H; Gibbs RS Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Mar; 220(3):249.e1-249.e3. PubMed ID: 30471257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Use of Oral and Emergency Contraceptives After the US Supreme Court's Dobbs Decision. Qato DM; Myerson R; Shooshtari A; Guadamuz JS; Alexander GC JAMA Netw Open; 2024 Jun; 7(6):e2418620. PubMed ID: 38922616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Ahmed A; Evans DP; Jackson J; Meier BM; Tomori C J Law Med Ethics; 2023; 51(3):485-489. PubMed ID: 38088610 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. INTRODUCTION: Securing Reproductive Justice After Ahmed A; Huberfeld N; McClain LC J Law Med Ethics; 2023; 51(3):463-467. PubMed ID: 38088627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Public health and clinical implications of Dobbs v. Jackson for patients and healthcare providers: A scoping review. Zhu DT; Zhao L; Alzoubi T; Shenin N; Baskaran T; Tikhonov J; Wang C PLoS One; 2024; 19(3):e0288947. PubMed ID: 38551970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. People's knowledge of and attitudes toward abortion laws before and after the Jozkowski KN; Bueno X; Turner RC; Crawford BL; Lo WJ Sex Reprod Health Matters; 2023 Dec; 31(1):2233794. PubMed ID: 37565622 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Coming full circle: a reflection on the Supreme Court's decision in Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt. Toti S Contraception; 2016 Nov; 94(5):439-440. PubMed ID: 27639929 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Otolaryngologists and Reproductive Rights. Yalamanchi P; Faucett EA; Shuman AG Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2023 Nov; 169(5):1393-1396. PubMed ID: 37210612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Protocol to the African Charter on the Rights of Women: implications for access to abortion at the regional level. Ngwena CG Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2010 Aug; 110(2):163-6. PubMed ID: 20546748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. How important was the Pill to women's economic well-being? If Roe v. Wade were overturned, how might society change? Joyce T J Policy Anal Manage; 2013; 32(4):879-87. PubMed ID: 24665470 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. (Re)criminalizing Abortion: Returning to the Political with Stories. Annas GJ J Law Med Ethics; 2023; 51(3):480-484. PubMed ID: 38088615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]