122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38795714)
21. Advancing Birth Equity in a Post-Dobbs US.
Crear-Perry J; Hassan A; Daniel S
JAMA; 2022 Nov; 328(17):1689-1690. PubMed ID: 36318120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Beyond Roe, after Casey: the present and future of a "fundamental" right.
Benshoof J
Womens Health Issues; 1993; 3(3):162-70. PubMed ID: 8274872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Implications of the Federal Abortion Ban for Women's Health in the United States.
Weitz TA; Yanow S
Reprod Health Matters; 2008 May; 16(31 Suppl):99-107. PubMed ID: 18772090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The End of Roe v Wade and New Legal Frontiers on the Constitutional Right to Abortion.
Cohen IG; Murray M; Gostin LO
JAMA; 2022 Jul; 328(4):325-326. PubMed ID: 35802387
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. The Supreme Court and abortion rights.
Annas GJ
N Engl J Med; 2007 May; 356(21):2201-7. PubMed ID: 17476003
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Preparing for a post-Roe world.
Minkoff H; Gibbs RS
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Mar; 220(3):249.e1-249.e3. PubMed ID: 30471257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Use of Oral and Emergency Contraceptives After the US Supreme Court's Dobbs Decision.
Qato DM; Myerson R; Shooshtari A; Guadamuz JS; Alexander GC
JAMA Netw Open; 2024 Jun; 7(6):e2418620. PubMed ID: 38922616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28.
Ahmed A; Evans DP; Jackson J; Meier BM; Tomori C
J Law Med Ethics; 2023; 51(3):485-489. PubMed ID: 38088610
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. INTRODUCTION: Securing Reproductive Justice After
Ahmed A; Huberfeld N; McClain LC
J Law Med Ethics; 2023; 51(3):463-467. PubMed ID: 38088627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. People's knowledge of and attitudes toward abortion laws before and after the
Jozkowski KN; Bueno X; Turner RC; Crawford BL; Lo WJ
Sex Reprod Health Matters; 2023 Dec; 31(1):2233794. PubMed ID: 37565622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Coming full circle: a reflection on the Supreme Court's decision in Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt.
Toti S
Contraception; 2016 Nov; 94(5):439-440. PubMed ID: 27639929
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Otolaryngologists and Reproductive Rights.
Yalamanchi P; Faucett EA; Shuman AG
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2023 Nov; 169(5):1393-1396. PubMed ID: 37210612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Protocol to the African Charter on the Rights of Women: implications for access to abortion at the regional level.
Ngwena CG
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2010 Aug; 110(2):163-6. PubMed ID: 20546748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. How important was the Pill to women's economic well-being? If Roe v. Wade were overturned, how might society change?
Joyce T
J Policy Anal Manage; 2013; 32(4):879-87. PubMed ID: 24665470
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. (Re)criminalizing Abortion: Returning to the Political with Stories.
Annas GJ
J Law Med Ethics; 2023; 51(3):480-484. PubMed ID: 38088615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The denial of abortion care information, referrals, and services undermines quality care for U.S. women.
Weitz TA; Fogel SB
Womens Health Issues; 2010; 20(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 20123171
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Protecting and Advancing Women's Health and Rights Post-Roe Era Through Policy.
Pirkle JRA
Health Educ Behav; 2023 Aug; 50(4):538-542. PubMed ID: 37073474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Pro-choice: a new militancy.
Davis SE
Hastings Cent Rep; 1989; 19(6):32-3. PubMed ID: 2606658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Stenberg v Carhart: a divided US Supreme Court debates partial birth abortion.
Heffernan L
Mod Law Rev; 2001 Jul; 64(4):618-27. PubMed ID: 16538739
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Comment on "Access to Abortion After Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization: Advocacy and a Call to Action for the Profession of Psychiatry".
Woesner ME; Wilson SM
Acad Psychiatry; 2023 Dec; 47(6):689-690. PubMed ID: 38036936
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
