135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38797781)
1. Comparison of transverse dimensional and incisor changes between wide and narrow orthodontic archwires: a randomized controlled trial.
Ahmed AS; Al-Nimri KS; Ahmed WS
Clin Oral Investig; 2024 May; 28(6):338. PubMed ID: 38797781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of mandibular arch changes during alignment and leveling with 2 preadjusted edgewise appliances.
Fleming PS; DiBiase AT; Sarri G; Lee RT
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Sep; 136(3):340-7. PubMed ID: 19732667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mandibular dental arch changes with active self-ligating brackets combined with different archwires.
Atik E; Akarsu-Guven B; Kocadereli I
Niger J Clin Pract; 2018 May; 21(5):566-572. PubMed ID: 29735855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of maxillary arch dimensional and inclination changes with self-ligating and conventional brackets using broad archwires.
Atik E; Akarsu-Guven B; Kocadereli I; Ciger S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Jun; 149(6):830-7. PubMed ID: 27241993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mandibular dental arch changes associated with treatment of crowding using self-ligating and conventional brackets.
Pandis N; Polychronopoulou A; Makou M; Eliades T
Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):248-53. PubMed ID: 19959610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The timing of significant arch dimensional changes with fixed orthodontic appliances: data from a multicenter randomised controlled trial.
Fleming PS; Lee RT; Mcdonald T; Pandis N; Johal A
J Dent; 2014 Jan; 42(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 24269833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Finishing effectiveness of different archwires using SmartClip™ self-ligating brackets: a clinical study.
Ferrari S; Bellincampi M; Sfondrini MF; Caprioglio A; Gandini P
Int Orthod; 2014 Mar; 12(1):125-38. PubMed ID: 24456630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of transverse maxillary dental arch width changes with self-ligating and conventional brackets in patients requiring premolar extraction - A randomised clinical trial.
Bashir R; Sonar S; Batra P; Srivastava A; Singla A
Int Orthod; 2019 Dec; 17(4):687-692. PubMed ID: 31466930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Efficiency of self-ligating vs conventionally ligated brackets during initial alignment.
Ong E; McCallum H; Griffin MP; Ho C
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Aug; 138(2):138.e1-7; discussion 138-9. PubMed ID: 20691348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Self-ligating vs conventional brackets in the treatment of mandibular crowding: a prospective clinical trial of treatment duration and dental effects.
Pandis N; Polychronopoulou A; Eliades T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Aug; 132(2):208-15. PubMed ID: 17693371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of maxillary arch dimensional changes with passive and active self-ligation and conventional brackets in the permanent dentition: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial.
Fleming PS; Lee RT; Marinho V; Johal A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Aug; 144(2):185-93. PubMed ID: 23910199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Maxillary arch width changes during orthodontic treatment with fixed self-ligating and traditional straight-wire appliances.
Tecco S; Tetè S; Perillo L; Chimenti C; Festa F
World J Orthod; 2009; 10(4):290-4. PubMed ID: 20072744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Measurement of forces and moments around the maxillary arch for treatment of a simulated lingual incisor and high canine malocclusion using straight and mushroom archwires in fixed lingual appliances.
Owen B; Gullion G; Heo G; Carey JP; Major PW; Romanyk DL
Eur J Orthod; 2017 Nov; 39(6):665-672. PubMed ID: 28430887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparative assessment of the forces and moments generated at the maxillary incisors between conventional and self-ligating brackets using a reverse curve of Spee NiTi archwire.
Sifakakis I; Pandis N; Makou M; Eliades T; Bourauel C
Aust Orthod J; 2010 Nov; 26(2):127-33. PubMed ID: 21175021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Commercially available archwire forms compared with normal dental arch forms in a Japanese population.
Oda S; Arai K; Nakahara R
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Apr; 137(4):520-7. PubMed ID: 20362913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Separation of aligning and leveling stages to control mandibular incisor inclination: A randomized clinical trial.
Theerasopon P; Lindauer SJ; Charoemratrote C
Dental Press J Orthod; 2021; 26(2):e2119378. PubMed ID: 33950082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the efficacy of tooth alignment among lingual and labial brackets: an in vitro study.
Alobeid A; El-Bialy T; Reimann S; Keilig L; Cornelius D; Jäger A; Bourauel C
Eur J Orthod; 2018 Nov; 40(6):660-665. PubMed ID: 29546390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative assessment of dental and basal arch dimensions of passive and active self-ligating versus conventional appliances : A randomized clinical trial.
Alabdullah MM; Burhan AS; Nabawia A; Nawaya F; Saltaji H
J Orofac Orthop; 2023 Apr; 84(Suppl 2):74-83. PubMed ID: 35788397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Alignment efficiency of Damon3 self-ligating and conventional orthodontic bracket systems: a randomized clinical trial.
Scott P; DiBiase AT; Sherriff M; Cobourne MT
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Oct; 134(4):470.e1-8. PubMed ID: 18929262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of levelling of the curve of Spee on the proclination of mandibular incisors and expansion of dental arches: a prospective clinical trial.
Pandis N; Polychronopoulou A; Sifakakis I; Makou M; Eliades T
Aust Orthod J; 2010 May; 26(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 20575202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
