These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38798330)

  • 1. The Precision and Power of Population Branch Statistics in Identifying the Genomic Signatures of Local Adaptation.
    Shpak M; Lawrence KN; Pool JE
    bioRxiv; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38798330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Maximum SNP FST Outperforms Full-Window Statistics for Detecting Soft Sweeps in Local Adaptation.
    da Silva Ribeiro T; Galván JA; Pool JE
    Genome Biol Evol; 2022 Oct; 14(10):. PubMed ID: 36152314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A haplotype method detects diverse scenarios of local adaptation from genomic sequence variation.
    Lange JD; Pool JE
    Mol Ecol; 2016 Jul; 25(13):3081-100. PubMed ID: 27135633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluating power to detect recurrent selective sweeps under increasingly realistic evolutionary null models.
    Soni V; Johri P; Jensen JD
    bioRxiv; 2023 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 37398347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The pitfalls and virtues of population genetic summary statistics: Detecting selective sweeps in recent divergences.
    Schneider K; White TJ; Mitchell S; Adams CE; Reeve R; Elmer KR
    J Evol Biol; 2021 Jun; 34(6):893-909. PubMed ID: 33185292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Recent selective sweeps in North American Drosophila melanogaster show signatures of soft sweeps.
    Garud NR; Messer PW; Buzbas EO; Petrov DA
    PLoS Genet; 2015 Feb; 11(2):e1005004. PubMed ID: 25706129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Detecting Positive Selection in Populations Using Genetic Data.
    Koropoulis A; Alachiotis N; Pavlidis P
    Methods Mol Biol; 2020; 2090():87-123. PubMed ID: 31975165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Soft shoulders ahead: spurious signatures of soft and partial selective sweeps result from linked hard sweeps.
    Schrider DR; Mendes FK; Hahn MW; Kern AD
    Genetics; 2015 May; 200(1):267-84. PubMed ID: 25716978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Elucidation of population stratifying markers and selective sweeps in crossbred Landlly pig population using genome-wide SNP data.
    Saini T; Chauhan A; Ahmad SF; Kumar A; Vaishnav S; Singh S; Mehrotra A; Bhushan B; Gaur GK; Dutt T
    Mamm Genome; 2024 Jun; 35(2):170-185. PubMed ID: 38485788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hard versus soft selective sweeps during domestication and improvement in soybean.
    Zhong L; Zhu Y; Olsen KM
    Mol Ecol; 2022 Jun; 31(11):3137-3153. PubMed ID: 35366022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fast and robust detection of ancestral selective sweeps.
    Cheng X; Xu C; DeGiorgio M
    Mol Ecol; 2017 Dec; 26(24):6871-6891. PubMed ID: 29113018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Identifying and Classifying Shared Selective Sweeps from Multilocus Data.
    Harris AM; DeGiorgio M
    Genetics; 2020 May; 215(1):143-171. PubMed ID: 32152048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Enhancing the mathematical properties of new haplotype homozygosity statistics for the detection of selective sweeps.
    Garud NR; Rosenberg NA
    Theor Popul Biol; 2015 Jun; 102():94-101. PubMed ID: 25891325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Gene-specific selective sweeps in bacteria and archaea caused by negative frequency-dependent selection.
    Takeuchi N; Cordero OX; Koonin EV; Kaneko K
    BMC Biol; 2015 Apr; 13():20. PubMed ID: 25928466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Global adaptation complicates the interpretation of genome scans for local adaptation.
    Booker TR; Yeaman S; Whitlock MC
    Evol Lett; 2021 Feb; 5(1):4-15. PubMed ID: 33552532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genomic Signatures After Five Generations of Intensive Selective Breeding: Runs of Homozygosity and Genetic Diversity in Representative Domestic and Wild Populations of Turbot (
    Aramburu O; Ceballos F; Casanova A; Le Moan A; Hemmer-Hansen J; Bekkevold D; Bouza C; Martínez P
    Front Genet; 2020; 11():296. PubMed ID: 32346384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Identifying loci under positive selection in complex population histories.
    Refoyo-Martínez A; da Fonseca RR; Halldórsdóttir K; Árnason E; Mailund T; Racimo F
    Genome Res; 2019 Sep; 29(9):1506-1520. PubMed ID: 31362936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluating power to detect recurrent selective sweeps under increasingly realistic evolutionary null models.
    Soni V; Johri P; Jensen JD
    Evolution; 2023 Oct; 77(10):2113-2127. PubMed ID: 37395482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Versatile Detection of Diverse Selective Sweeps with Flex-Sweep.
    Lauterbur ME; Munch K; Enard D
    Mol Biol Evol; 2023 Jun; 40(6):. PubMed ID: 37307561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Allelic gene conversion softens selective sweeps.
    Schrider DR
    bioRxiv; 2023 Dec; ():. PubMed ID: 38106127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.