These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38798410)

  • 1. Functional benefits of continuous vs. categorical listening strategies on the neural encoding and perception of noise-degraded speech.
    Rizzi R; Bidelman GM
    bioRxiv; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38798410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Functional benefits of continuous vs. categorical listening strategies on the neural encoding and perception of noise-degraded speech.
    Rizzi R; Bidelman GM
    Brain Res; 2024 Dec; 1844():149166. PubMed ID: 39151718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hearing in categories aids speech streaming at the "cocktail party".
    Bidelman GM; Bernard F; Skubic K
    bioRxiv; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38617284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Continuous dynamics in behavior reveal interactions between perceptual warping in categorization and speech-in-noise perception.
    Bidelman GM; Carter JA
    Front Neurosci; 2023; 17():1032369. PubMed ID: 36937676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Autonomic Nervous System Correlates of Speech Categorization Revealed Through Pupillometry.
    Lewis GA; Bidelman GM
    Front Neurosci; 2019; 13():1418. PubMed ID: 31998068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of Noise on the Behavioral and Neural Categorization of Speech.
    Bidelman GM; Bush LC; Boudreaux AM
    Front Neurosci; 2020; 14():153. PubMed ID: 32180700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Attentional modulation and domain-specificity underlying the neural organization of auditory categorical perception.
    Bidelman GM; Walker BS
    Eur J Neurosci; 2017 Mar; 45(5):690-699. PubMed ID: 28112440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Auditory cortex is susceptible to lexical influence as revealed by informational vs. energetic masking of speech categorization.
    Carter JA; Bidelman GM
    Brain Res; 2021 May; 1759():147385. PubMed ID: 33631210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Listening Effort by Native and Nonnative Listeners Due to Noise, Reverberation, and Talker Foreign Accent During English Speech Perception.
    Peng ZE; Wang LM
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Apr; 62(4):1068-1081. PubMed ID: 30986135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perceptual warping exposes categorical representations for speech in human brainstem responses.
    Carter JA; Bidelman GM
    Neuroimage; 2023 Apr; 269():119899. PubMed ID: 36720437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of directional sound processing and listener's motivation on EEG responses to continuous noisy speech: Do normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners differ?
    Mirkovic B; Debener S; Schmidt J; Jaeger M; Neher T
    Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 377():260-270. PubMed ID: 31003037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Brainstem correlates of concurrent speech identification in adverse listening conditions.
    Yellamsetty A; Bidelman GM
    Brain Res; 2019 Jul; 1714():182-192. PubMed ID: 30796895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Noise and pitch interact during the cortical segregation of concurrent speech.
    Bidelman GM; Yellamsetty A
    Hear Res; 2017 Aug; 351():34-44. PubMed ID: 28578876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Data-driven machine learning models for decoding speech categorization from evoked brain responses.
    Mahmud MS; Yeasin M; Bidelman GM
    J Neural Eng; 2021 Mar; 18(4):. PubMed ID: 33690177
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Functional changes in inter- and intra-hemispheric cortical processing underlying degraded speech perception.
    Bidelman GM; Howell M
    Neuroimage; 2016 Jan; 124(Pt A):581-590. PubMed ID: 26386346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Brainstem-cortical functional connectivity for speech is differentially challenged by noise and reverberation.
    Bidelman GM; Davis MK; Pridgen MH
    Hear Res; 2018 Sep; 367():149-160. PubMed ID: 29871826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Non-native listeners' recognition of high-variability speech using PRESTO.
    Tamati TN; Pisoni DB
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Oct; 25(9):869-92. PubMed ID: 25405842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Musical training orchestrates coordinated neuroplasticity in auditory brainstem and cortex to counteract age-related declines in categorical vowel perception.
    Bidelman GM; Alain C
    J Neurosci; 2015 Jan; 35(3):1240-9. PubMed ID: 25609638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Acceptable Noise Levels and Preferred Signal-to-noise Ratios for Speech and Music.
    Lee D; Lewis JD; Johnstone PM; Plyler PN
    Ear Hear; 2022; 43(3):1013-1022. PubMed ID: 34759206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pupil Dilation Reflects Perceptual Priorities During a Receptive Speech Task.
    Mechtenberg H; Giorio C; Myers EB
    Ear Hear; 2024 Mar-Apr 01; 45(2):425-440. PubMed ID: 37882091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.