These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38798410)
1. Functional benefits of continuous vs. categorical listening strategies on the neural encoding and perception of noise-degraded speech. Rizzi R; Bidelman GM bioRxiv; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38798410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Functional benefits of continuous vs. categorical listening strategies on the neural encoding and perception of noise-degraded speech. Rizzi R; Bidelman GM Brain Res; 2024 Dec; 1844():149166. PubMed ID: 39151718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hearing in categories aids speech streaming at the "cocktail party". Bidelman GM; Bernard F; Skubic K bioRxiv; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38617284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Continuous dynamics in behavior reveal interactions between perceptual warping in categorization and speech-in-noise perception. Bidelman GM; Carter JA Front Neurosci; 2023; 17():1032369. PubMed ID: 36937676 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Autonomic Nervous System Correlates of Speech Categorization Revealed Through Pupillometry. Lewis GA; Bidelman GM Front Neurosci; 2019; 13():1418. PubMed ID: 31998068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of Noise on the Behavioral and Neural Categorization of Speech. Bidelman GM; Bush LC; Boudreaux AM Front Neurosci; 2020; 14():153. PubMed ID: 32180700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Attentional modulation and domain-specificity underlying the neural organization of auditory categorical perception. Bidelman GM; Walker BS Eur J Neurosci; 2017 Mar; 45(5):690-699. PubMed ID: 28112440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Auditory cortex is susceptible to lexical influence as revealed by informational vs. energetic masking of speech categorization. Carter JA; Bidelman GM Brain Res; 2021 May; 1759():147385. PubMed ID: 33631210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Listening Effort by Native and Nonnative Listeners Due to Noise, Reverberation, and Talker Foreign Accent During English Speech Perception. Peng ZE; Wang LM J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Apr; 62(4):1068-1081. PubMed ID: 30986135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Perceptual warping exposes categorical representations for speech in human brainstem responses. Carter JA; Bidelman GM Neuroimage; 2023 Apr; 269():119899. PubMed ID: 36720437 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of directional sound processing and listener's motivation on EEG responses to continuous noisy speech: Do normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners differ? Mirkovic B; Debener S; Schmidt J; Jaeger M; Neher T Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 377():260-270. PubMed ID: 31003037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]