These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

72 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3880056)

  • 1. Clinical research: the case study and single-subject designs.
    Weiner IS; Eisen RG
    J Allied Health; 1985 May; 14(2):191-201. PubMed ID: 3880056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Editorial: Journal of Pediatric Psychology statement of purpose: section on single-subject studies.
    Rapoff M; Stark L
    J Pediatr Psychol; 2008; 33(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 18000011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Single case studies in psychology and psychiatry.
    Sjödén PO
    Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl; 1988; 147():11-21. PubMed ID: 3059452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Single-subject experimental designs: a practical research alternative for practicing physicians.
    Marvel MK; Amodei N
    Fam Pract Res J; 1992 Jun; 12(2):109-21. PubMed ID: 1621531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Randomization tests for multiple-baseline designs: an extension of the SCRT-R package.
    Bulté I; Onghena P
    Behav Res Methods; 2009 May; 41(2):477-85. PubMed ID: 19363188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Alternating treatments design: one strategy for comparing the effects of two treatments in a single subject.
    Barlow DH; Hayes SC
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1979; 12(2):199-210. PubMed ID: 489478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Adaptive designs for confirmatory clinical trials.
    Bretz F; Koenig F; Brannath W; Glimm E; Posch M
    Stat Med; 2009 Apr; 28(8):1181-217. PubMed ID: 19206095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Toward an experimental chiropractic: time-series designs.
    Keating JC; Giljum K; Menke JM; Lonczak RS; Meeker WC
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1985 Dec; 8(4):229-38. PubMed ID: 4078502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Guidelines for overcoming design problems in family planning operations research.
    Fisher AA; Laing J; Stoeckel J
    Stud Fam Plann; 1985; 16(2):100-5. PubMed ID: 3992609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The multiple baseline across subjects design: proposed use in research.
    Center DB; Leach RA
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1984 Dec; 7(4):231-6. PubMed ID: 6520549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analyzing data from single-case designs using multilevel models: new applications and some agenda items for future research.
    Shadish WR; Kyse EN; Rindskopf DM
    Psychol Methods; 2013 Sep; 18(3):385-405. PubMed ID: 23834421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Single-subject research design: recommendations for levels of evidence and quality rating.
    Romeiser Logan L; Hickman RR; Harris SR; Heriza CB
    Dev Med Child Neurol; 2008 Feb; 50(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 18201299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Designs for phase I clinical trials with multiple courses of subjects at different doses.
    Fan SK; Wang YG
    Biometrics; 2007 Sep; 63(3):856-64. PubMed ID: 17403103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The designs and methods of published nursing research: 1956-1983.
    Jacobsen BS; Meininger JC
    Nurs Res; 1985; 34(5):306-12. PubMed ID: 3900933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Advancements in contemporary physical therapy research: use of mixed methods designs.
    Rauscher L; Greenfield BH
    Phys Ther; 2009 Jan; 89(1):91-100. PubMed ID: 19008328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [The case-control design in medical research].
    Borja-Aburto VH; Muñoz SR; Bustamante-Montes P
    Rev Invest Clin; 1997; 49(6):481-9. PubMed ID: 9580282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A framework for planning and critiquing medication compliance and persistence research using prospective study designs.
    Gwadry-Sridhar FH; Manias E; Zhang Y; Roy A; Yu-Isenberg K; Hughes DA; Nichol MB
    Clin Ther; 2009 Feb; 31(2):421-35. PubMed ID: 19302915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Statistical comparison of four effect sizes for single-subject designs.
    Campbell JM
    Behav Modif; 2004 Mar; 28(2):234-46. PubMed ID: 14997950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interrater agreement of visual analysis in single-subject decisions: quantitative review and analysis.
    Ottenbacher KJ
    Am J Ment Retard; 1993 Jul; 98(1):135-42. PubMed ID: 8373565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pathways to impact evaluation in continuing education in the health professions.
    Walsh PL; Green JS
    J Allied Health; 1982 May; 11(2):115-23. PubMed ID: 6765093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.