BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38802417)

  • 1. Multiscale off-fault brecciation records coseismic energy budget of principal fault zone.
    Agroli G; Okamoto A; Uno M; Tsuchiya N
    Sci Rep; 2024 May; 14(1):12121. PubMed ID: 38802417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Coseismic fault slip inversion of the 2013 Lushan Ms 7.0 earthquake based on the triangular dislocation model.
    Duan H; Chen J; Zhang S; Wu X; Chu Z
    Sci Rep; 2022 Mar; 12(1):3514. PubMed ID: 35241753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Research on the Surface Deformation, Fault Rupture, and Coseismic Geohazard of the 2022 Luding Mw 6.8 Earthquake.
    Lu Y; Yang Y; Zeng L; Xu W; Song J; Li X
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Dec; 23(24):. PubMed ID: 38139720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Shallow fault-zone dilatancy recovery after the 2003 Bam earthquake in Iran.
    Fielding EJ; Lundgren PR; Bürgmann R; Funning GJ
    Nature; 2009 Mar; 458(7234):64-8. PubMed ID: 19262670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Coseismic Deformation Field and Fault Slip Distribution Inversion of the 2020 Jiashi
    Zhang X; Li J; Liu X; Li Z; Adil N
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Mar; 23(6):. PubMed ID: 36991757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bridging time scales of faulting: From coseismic to postseismic slip of the
    Premus J; Gallovič F; Ampuero JP
    Sci Adv; 2022 Sep; 8(38):eabq2536. PubMed ID: 36149958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Coseismic and Postseismic Fault Slip for the 17 August 1999, M = 7.5, Izmit, Turkey Earthquake.
    Reilinger RE; Ergintav S; Bürgmann R; McClusky S; Lenk O; Barka A; Gurkan O; Hearn L; Feigl KL; Cakmak R; Aktug B; Ozener H; Töksoz MN
    Science; 2000 Sep; 289(5484):1519-1524. PubMed ID: 10968782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Source Models of the 2016 and 2022 Menyuan Earthquakes and Their Tectonic Implications Revealed by InSAR.
    Bai X; Zhang B; Guo A; Yan Y; Xu H; Bian X; Zhan S; Chen J
    Sensors (Basel); 2024 Jun; 24(11):. PubMed ID: 38894413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Slow rupture in a fluid-rich fault zone initiated the 2024
    Ma Z; Zeng H; Luo H; Liu Z; Jiang Y; Aoki Y; Wang W; Itoh Y; Lyu M; Cui Y; Yun SH; Hill EM; Wei S
    Science; 2024 Jul; ():eado5143. PubMed ID: 38963875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Structural features and seismotectonic implications of coseismic surface ruptures produced by the 2016
    Lin A
    J Seismol; 2017; 21(5):1079-1100. PubMed ID: 28867959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. RETRACTED: Coseismic rupturing stopped by Aso volcano during the 2016 Mw 7.1 Kumamoto earthquake, Japan.
    Lin A; Satsukawa T; Wang M; Mohammadi Asl Z; Fueta R; Nakajima F
    Science; 2016 Nov; 354(6314):869-874. PubMed ID: 27856904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Signature of transition to supershear rupture speed in the coseismic off-fault damage zone.
    Jara J; Bruhat L; Thomas MY; Antoine SL; Okubo K; Rougier E; Rosakis AJ; Sammis CG; Klinger Y; Jolivet R; Bhat HS
    Proc Math Phys Eng Sci; 2021 Nov; 477(2255):20210364. PubMed ID: 35153594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tectonic Implication of the 2022
    Yin X; Zhai H; Cai R; Qiu J; Zou X
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Feb; 23(4):. PubMed ID: 36850725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Immature characteristics of the East Anatolian Fault Zone from SAR, GNSS and strong motion data of the 2023 Türkiye-Syria earthquake doublet.
    Liu J; Huang C; Zhang G; Shan X; Korzhenkov A; Taymaz T
    Sci Rep; 2024 May; 14(1):10625. PubMed ID: 38724632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A New Perspective on Fault Geometry and Slip Distribution of the 2009 Dachaidan Mw 6.3 Earthquake from InSAR Observations.
    Liu Y; Xu C; Wen Y; Fok HS
    Sensors (Basel); 2015 Jul; 15(7):16786-803. PubMed ID: 26184210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On-fault earthquake energy density partitioning from shocked garnet in an exhumed seismic midcrustal fault.
    Toffol G; Pennacchioni G; Menegon L; Wallis D; Faccenda M; Camacho A; Bestmann M
    Sci Adv; 2024 Mar; 10(9):eadi8533. PubMed ID: 38427735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Paleoseismic study of the Kamishiro Fault on the northern segment of the Itoigawa-Shizuoka Tectonic Line, Japan.
    Lin A; Sano M; Wang M; Yan B; Bian D; Fueta R; Hosoya T
    J Seismol; 2017; 21(4):683-703. PubMed ID: 28729808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimation of recurrence interval of large earthquakes on the central Longmen Shan fault zone based on seismic moment accumulation/release model.
    Ren J; Zhang S
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2013; 2013():458341. PubMed ID: 23878524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cascadia megathrust earthquake rupture model constrained by geodetic fault locking.
    Li D; Liu Y
    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2021 May; 379(2196):20200135. PubMed ID: 33715408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. High-resolution co-seismic fault offsets of the 2023 Türkiye earthquake ruptures using satellite imagery.
    Provost F; Karabacak V; Malet JP; Van der Woerd J; Meghraoui M; Masson F; Ferry M; Michéa D; Pointal E
    Sci Rep; 2024 Mar; 14(1):6834. PubMed ID: 38514658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.