These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38802417)
1. Multiscale off-fault brecciation records coseismic energy budget of principal fault zone. Agroli G; Okamoto A; Uno M; Tsuchiya N Sci Rep; 2024 May; 14(1):12121. PubMed ID: 38802417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Coseismic fault slip inversion of the 2013 Lushan Ms 7.0 earthquake based on the triangular dislocation model. Duan H; Chen J; Zhang S; Wu X; Chu Z Sci Rep; 2022 Mar; 12(1):3514. PubMed ID: 35241753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Research on the Surface Deformation, Fault Rupture, and Coseismic Geohazard of the 2022 Luding Mw 6.8 Earthquake. Lu Y; Yang Y; Zeng L; Xu W; Song J; Li X Sensors (Basel); 2023 Dec; 23(24):. PubMed ID: 38139720 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Coseismic Deformation Field and Fault Slip Distribution Inversion of the 2020 Jiashi Zhang X; Li J; Liu X; Li Z; Adil N Sensors (Basel); 2023 Mar; 23(6):. PubMed ID: 36991757 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bridging time scales of faulting: From coseismic to postseismic slip of the Premus J; Gallovič F; Ampuero JP Sci Adv; 2022 Sep; 8(38):eabq2536. PubMed ID: 36149958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Source Models of the 2016 and 2022 Menyuan Earthquakes and Their Tectonic Implications Revealed by InSAR. Bai X; Zhang B; Guo A; Yan Y; Xu H; Bian X; Zhan S; Chen J Sensors (Basel); 2024 Jun; 24(11):. PubMed ID: 38894413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Structural features and seismotectonic implications of coseismic surface ruptures produced by the 2016 Lin A J Seismol; 2017; 21(5):1079-1100. PubMed ID: 28867959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. RETRACTED: Coseismic rupturing stopped by Aso volcano during the 2016 Mw 7.1 Kumamoto earthquake, Japan. Lin A; Satsukawa T; Wang M; Mohammadi Asl Z; Fueta R; Nakajima F Science; 2016 Nov; 354(6314):869-874. PubMed ID: 27856904 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Slow rupture in a fluid-rich fault zone initiated the 2024 Ma Z; Zeng H; Luo H; Liu Z; Jiang Y; Aoki Y; Wang W; Itoh Y; Lyu M; Cui Y; Yun SH; Hill EM; Wei S Science; 2024 Aug; 385(6711):866-871. PubMed ID: 38963875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Signature of transition to supershear rupture speed in the coseismic off-fault damage zone. Jara J; Bruhat L; Thomas MY; Antoine SL; Okubo K; Rougier E; Rosakis AJ; Sammis CG; Klinger Y; Jolivet R; Bhat HS Proc Math Phys Eng Sci; 2021 Nov; 477(2255):20210364. PubMed ID: 35153594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Tectonic Implication of the 2022 Yin X; Zhai H; Cai R; Qiu J; Zou X Sensors (Basel); 2023 Feb; 23(4):. PubMed ID: 36850725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Immature characteristics of the East Anatolian Fault Zone from SAR, GNSS and strong motion data of the 2023 Türkiye-Syria earthquake doublet. Liu J; Huang C; Zhang G; Shan X; Korzhenkov A; Taymaz T Sci Rep; 2024 May; 14(1):10625. PubMed ID: 38724632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A New Perspective on Fault Geometry and Slip Distribution of the 2009 Dachaidan Mw 6.3 Earthquake from InSAR Observations. Liu Y; Xu C; Wen Y; Fok HS Sensors (Basel); 2015 Jul; 15(7):16786-803. PubMed ID: 26184210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. On-fault earthquake energy density partitioning from shocked garnet in an exhumed seismic midcrustal fault. Toffol G; Pennacchioni G; Menegon L; Wallis D; Faccenda M; Camacho A; Bestmann M Sci Adv; 2024 Mar; 10(9):eadi8533. PubMed ID: 38427735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Paleoseismic study of the Kamishiro Fault on the northern segment of the Itoigawa-Shizuoka Tectonic Line, Japan. Lin A; Sano M; Wang M; Yan B; Bian D; Fueta R; Hosoya T J Seismol; 2017; 21(4):683-703. PubMed ID: 28729808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Estimation of recurrence interval of large earthquakes on the central Longmen Shan fault zone based on seismic moment accumulation/release model. Ren J; Zhang S ScientificWorldJournal; 2013; 2013():458341. PubMed ID: 23878524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cascadia megathrust earthquake rupture model constrained by geodetic fault locking. Li D; Liu Y Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2021 May; 379(2196):20200135. PubMed ID: 33715408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. High-resolution co-seismic fault offsets of the 2023 Türkiye earthquake ruptures using satellite imagery. Provost F; Karabacak V; Malet JP; Van der Woerd J; Meghraoui M; Masson F; Ferry M; Michéa D; Pointal E Sci Rep; 2024 Mar; 14(1):6834. PubMed ID: 38514658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]