These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38804871)

  • 1. The diagnostic accuracy of quality control rules.
    Åsberg A; Bolann BJ
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2024 May; ():1-6. PubMed ID: 38804871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quality control validation for a veterinary laboratory network of six Sysmex XT-2000iV hematology analyzers.
    Daly S; Graham PA; Freeman KP
    Vet Clin Pathol; 2022 Dec; 51(4):565-576. PubMed ID: 35922888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Internal quality control: Moving average algorithms outperform Westgard rules.
    Poh DKH; Lim CY; Tan RZ; Markus C; Loh TP
    Clin Biochem; 2021 Dec; 98():63-69. PubMed ID: 34534518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Selecting multi-rule quality control procedures based on patient risk.
    Bayat H
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2017 Oct; 55(11):1702-1708. PubMed ID: 28236626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A modified quality control protocol for infectious disease serology based on the Westgard rules.
    Wang Y; Li X; Li D; Xie Y
    Sci Rep; 2024 Jul; 14(1):16683. PubMed ID: 39030224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Performance characteristics of rules for internal quality control: probabilities for false rejection and error detection.
    Westgard JO; Groth T; Aronsson T; Falk H; de Verdier CH
    Clin Chem; 1977 Oct; 23(10):1857-67. PubMed ID: 902411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of 3 options for choosing control limits in biochemistry testing.
    Manzocchi S; Furman E; Freeman K
    Vet Clin Pathol; 2017 Mar; 46(1):120-125. PubMed ID: 28165632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Proposed guidelines for the internal quality control of analytical results in the medical laboratory.
    Petersen PH; Ricós C; Stöckl D; Libeer JC; Baadenhuijsen H; Fraser C; Thienpont L
    Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem; 1996 Dec; 34(12):983-99. PubMed ID: 8986407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A novel quantitative evaluation method for quality control results.
    Min WK; Ko DH; Cho EJ; Jeong TD; Lee W; Chun S; Cho HI
    Clin Chim Acta; 2015 Dec; 451(Pt B):175-9. PubMed ID: 26415821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Practical application of European biological variation combined with Westgard Sigma Rules in internal quality control.
    Song Z; Zhang J; Liu B; Wang H; Bi L; Xu Q
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2022 Oct; 60(11):1729-1735. PubMed ID: 36036501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Between and within calibration variation: implications for internal quality control rules.
    Lim CY; Lee JJS; Choy KW; Badrick T; Markus C; Loh TP
    Pathology; 2023 Jun; 55(4):525-530. PubMed ID: 36894352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluating the analytical quality control of urinary albumin measurements using sigma metrics.
    Wang H; Ma Y; Shan X
    Clin Biochem; 2019 Nov; 73():109-111. PubMed ID: 31351987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Performance characteristics of several rules for self-interpretation of proficiency testing data.
    Carey RN; Cembrowski GS; Garber CC; Zaki Z
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2005 Aug; 129(8):997-1003. PubMed ID: 16048412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Practical application of Westgard Sigma rules with run size in analytical biochemistry processes in clinical settings.
    Peng S; Zhang J; Zhou W; Mao W; Han Z
    J Clin Lab Anal; 2021 Mar; 35(3):e23665. PubMed ID: 33270940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using the confidence interval of the mean to detect systematic errors in one analytical run.
    Asberg A; Bolann B; Mikkelsen G
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2010 Oct; 70(6):410-4. PubMed ID: 20602577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Usefulness of clinical prediction rules for the diagnosis of venous thromboembolism: a systematic review.
    Tamariz LJ; Eng J; Segal JB; Krishnan JA; Bolger DT; Streiff MB; Jenckes MW; Bass EB
    Am J Med; 2004 Nov; 117(9):676-84. PubMed ID: 15501206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Total observed error, total allowable error, and QC rules for canine serum and urine cortisol achievable with the Immulite 2000 Xpi cortisol immunoassay.
    Korchia J; Freeman KP
    J Vet Diagn Invest; 2022 Mar; 34(2):246-257. PubMed ID: 35264042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Practical application of Sigma Metrics QC procedures in clinical chemistry.
    Schoenmakers CH; Naus AJ; Vermeer HJ; van Loon D; Steen G
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2011 Nov; 49(11):1837-43. PubMed ID: 21801029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The importance of quality control validation and relationships with total error quality goals and bias in the interpretation of laboratory results.
    Freeman K; Klenner-Gastreich S; Korchia J
    Vet Clin Pathol; 2024 Feb; 53 Suppl 1():65-74. PubMed ID: 38165023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Selection of within-run quality control rules for laboratory biomarkers.
    Laubender RP; Geistanger A
    Stat Med; 2021 Jul; 40(16):3645-3666. PubMed ID: 33876446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.