196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38805357)
1. Robotic, transanal, and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for locally advanced mid/low rectal cancer: European multicentre, propensity score-matched study.
de'Angelis N; Marchegiani F; Martínez-Pérez A; Biondi A; Pucciarelli S; Schena CA; Pellino G; Kraft M; van Lieshout AS; Morelli L; Valverde A; Lupinacci RM; Gómez-Abril SA; Persiani R; Tuynman JB; Espin-Basany E; Ris F;
BJS Open; 2024 May; 8(3):. PubMed ID: 38805357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of laparoscopic versus robot-assisted versus transanal total mesorectal excision surgery for rectal cancer: a retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study of short-term outcomes.
Hol JC; Burghgraef TA; Rutgers MLW; Crolla RMPH; van Geloven NAW; Hompes R; Leijtens JWA; Polat F; Pronk A; Smits AB; Tuynman JB; Verdaasdonk EGG; Consten ECJ; Sietses C
Br J Surg; 2021 Nov; 108(11):1380-1387. PubMed ID: 34370834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An international multicentre prospective audit of elective rectal cancer surgery; operative approach versus outcome, including transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME).
2017 European Society of Coloproctology (ESCP) collaborating group
Colorectal Dis; 2018 Sep; 20 Suppl 6():33-46. PubMed ID: 30255642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of early experience of robotic and transanal total mesorectal excision using propensity score matching.
Law WL; Foo DCC
Surg Endosc; 2019 Mar; 33(3):757-763. PubMed ID: 30014329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Early Experience With Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision Compared With Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.
Alhanafy MK; Park SS; Park SC; Park B; Kim MJ; Sohn DK; Chang HJ; Oh JH
Dis Colon Rectum; 2020 Nov; 63(11):1500-1510. PubMed ID: 33044291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Total mesorectal excision in MRI-defined low rectal cancer: multicentre study comparing oncological outcomes of robotic, laparoscopic and transanal total mesorectal excision in high-volume centres.
Rutgers ML; Burghgraef TA; Hol JC; Crolla RM; van Geloven NA; Leijtens JW; Polat F; Pronk A; Smits AB; Tuyman JB; Verdaasdonk EG; Sietses C; Consten EC; Hompes R
BJS Open; 2024 May; 8(3):. PubMed ID: 38788679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) versus laparoscopic TME for MRI-defined low rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis of oncological outcomes.
Roodbeen SX; Penna M; Mackenzie H; Kusters M; Slater A; Jones OM; Lindsey I; Guy RJ; Cunningham C; Hompes R
Surg Endosc; 2019 Aug; 33(8):2459-2467. PubMed ID: 30350103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision With Delayed Coloanal Anastomosis (TaTME-DCAA) Versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision (LTME) and Robotic Total Mesorectal Excision (RTME) for Low Rectal Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Short-term Outcomes, Bowel Function, and Cost.
Seow-En I; Wu J; Tan IE; Zhao Y; Seah AWM; Wee IJY; Ying-Ru Ng Y; Kwong-Wei Tan E
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2024 Feb; 34(1):54-61. PubMed ID: 37987634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Outcomes of open vs laparoscopic vs robotic vs transanal total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer: a network meta-analysis.
Seow W; Dudi-Venkata NN; Bedrikovetski S; Kroon HM; Sammour T
Tech Coloproctol; 2023 May; 27(5):345-360. PubMed ID: 36508067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision in Mid-Low Rectal Cancer: Evaluation of the Learning Curve and Comparison of Short-term Results With Standard Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision.
Zeng Z; Liu Z; Huang L; Liu H; Jie H; Luo S; Zhang X; Kang L
Dis Colon Rectum; 2021 Apr; 64(4):380-388. PubMed ID: 33394779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The role of transanal compared to laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (taTME vs. lapTME) for the treatment of mid-low rectal cancer in obese patients: outcomes of a multicenter propensity-matched analysis.
Tejedor P; Arredondo J; Simó V; Zorrilla J; Baixauli J; Jiménez LM; Pastor C
Updates Surg; 2023 Dec; 75(8):2191-2200. PubMed ID: 37903996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Comparative study of functional prognosis of transanal total mesorectal excision and conventional total mesorectal excision based on propensity score matching].
Zhu LY; Zhao SD; Shen ZL; Ye YJ; Yin MJ; Yang XD; Xie QW; Jiang KW; Liang B; Wang S
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Aug; 58(8):619-625. PubMed ID: 32727194
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Short-term efficacy of robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision with and without lateral lymph node dissection for mid-low advanced rectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis].
Shi FY; Zhang L; Qin Q; Jin X; Hu CH; Yu TY; Ma L; Wang GH; Wu H; Xia P; Sun XJ; She JJ
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Apr; 23(4):370-376. PubMed ID: 32306605
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Long-term outcomes by a transanal approach to total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.
Marks JH; Myers EA; Zeger EL; Denittis AS; Gummadi M; Marks GJ
Surg Endosc; 2017 Dec; 31(12):5248-5257. PubMed ID: 28643051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of Minimally Invasive Resection Technique on Sphincter Preservation and Short-term Outcome in Low Rectal Cancer in the Netherlands.
Rutgers ML; Detering R; Roodbeen SX; Crolla RM; Dekker JWT; Tuynman JB; Sietses C; Bemelman WA; Tanis PJ; Hompes R;
Dis Colon Rectum; 2021 Dec; 64(12):1488-1500. PubMed ID: 33990499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Safety and prognosis analysis of transanal total mesorectal excision versus laparoscopic mesorectal excision for mid-low rectal cancer].
Sun R; Cong L; Qiu HZ; Lin GL; Wu B; Niu BZ; Sun XY; Zhou JL; Xu L; Lu JY; Xiao Y
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2022 Jun; 25(6):522-530. PubMed ID: 35754217
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Rectal Surgery Evaluation Trial: protocol for a parallel cohort trial of outcomes using surgical techniques for total mesorectal excision with low anterior resection in high-risk rectal cancer patients.
Rouanet P; Gourgou S; Gogenur I; Jayne D; Ulrich A; Rautio T; Spinoglio G; Bouazza N; Moussion A; Gomez Ruiz M
Colorectal Dis; 2019 May; 21(5):516-522. PubMed ID: 30740878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Proctectomy for Rectal Cancer: A Propensity-Matched Analysis of Bi-National Colorectal Cancer Audit Data.
Bedrikovetski S; Dudi-Venkata NN; Kroon HM; Moore JW; Hunter RA; Sammour T
Dis Colon Rectum; 2020 Jun; 63(6):778-787. PubMed ID: 32109916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Outcomes in rectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic or robotic low anterior resection compared to open: a propensity-matched analysis of the NCDB (2010-2015).
Chapman BC; Edgcomb M; Gleisner A; Vogel JD
Surg Endosc; 2020 Nov; 34(11):4754-4771. PubMed ID: 31728754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quality of total mesorectal excision and depth of circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer: a matched comparison of the first 20 robotic cases.
Barnajian M; Pettet D; Kazi E; Foppa C; Bergamaschi R
Colorectal Dis; 2014 Aug; 16(8):603-9. PubMed ID: 24750995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
