These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38805447)

  • 21. Non-native listeners' recognition of high-variability speech using PRESTO.
    Tamati TN; Pisoni DB
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Oct; 25(9):869-92. PubMed ID: 25405842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Infants' preference for native audiovisual speech dissociated from congruency preference.
    Shaw K; Baart M; Depowski N; Bortfeld H
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0126059. PubMed ID: 25927529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Listening Effort by Native and Nonnative Listeners Due to Noise, Reverberation, and Talker Foreign Accent During English Speech Perception.
    Peng ZE; Wang LM
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Apr; 62(4):1068-1081. PubMed ID: 30986135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Eye fixations of deaf and hearing observers in simultaneous communication perception.
    De Filippo CL; Lansing CR
    Ear Hear; 2006 Aug; 27(4):331-52. PubMed ID: 16825884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Native and non-native listeners show similar yet distinct oscillatory dynamics when using gestures to access speech in noise.
    Drijvers L; van der Plas M; Özyürek A; Jensen O
    Neuroimage; 2019 Jul; 194():55-67. PubMed ID: 30905837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Influence of prosodic boundaries on comprehension of spoken English sentences.
    Blasko DG; Hall MD
    Percept Mot Skills; 1998 Aug; 87(1):3-18. PubMed ID: 9760620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A link between individual differences in multisensory speech perception and eye movements.
    Gurler D; Doyle N; Walker E; Magnotti J; Beauchamp M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 May; 77(4):1333-41. PubMed ID: 25810157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Prosodic boundary information modulates phonetic categorization.
    Kim S; Cho T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jul; 134(1):EL19-25. PubMed ID: 23862901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Degrading phonetic information affects matching of audiovisual speech in adults, but not in infants.
    Baart M; Vroomen J; Shaw K; Bortfeld H
    Cognition; 2014 Jan; 130(1):31-43. PubMed ID: 24141035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Cross-language perception of Cantonese vowels spoken by native and non-native speakers.
    So CK; Attina V
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2014 Oct; 43(5):611-30. PubMed ID: 24057944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Listening to talking faces: motor cortical activation during speech perception.
    Skipper JI; Nusbaum HC; Small SL
    Neuroimage; 2005 Mar; 25(1):76-89. PubMed ID: 15734345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Phonetic Encoding Contributes to the Processing of Linguistic Prosody at the Word Level: Cross-Linguistic Evidence From Event-Related Potentials.
    Yu L; Zeng J; Wang S; Zhang Y
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Dec; 64(12):4791-4801. PubMed ID: 34731592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. (Mis) understanding your native language: Regional accent impedes processing of information status.
    Arnhold A; Porretta V; Chen A; Verstegen SAJM; Mok I; Järvikivi J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2020 Aug; 27(4):801-808. PubMed ID: 32378120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Neurophysiological Indices of Audiovisual Speech Processing Reveal a Hierarchy of Multisensory Integration Effects.
    O'Sullivan AE; Crosse MJ; Liberto GMD; de Cheveigné A; Lalor EC
    J Neurosci; 2021 Jun; 41(23):4991-5003. PubMed ID: 33824190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Language/Culture Modulates Brain and Gaze Processes in Audiovisual Speech Perception.
    Hisanaga S; Sekiyama K; Igasaki T; Murayama N
    Sci Rep; 2016 Oct; 6():35265. PubMed ID: 27734953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Experience with a second language affects the use of fundamental frequency in speech segmentation.
    Tremblay A; Namjoshi J; Spinelli E; Broersma M; Cho T; Kim S; Martínez-García MT; Connell K
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0181709. PubMed ID: 28738093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Mandarin speech perception by ear and eye follows a universal principle.
    Chen TH; Massaro DW
    Percept Psychophys; 2004 Jul; 66(5):820-36. PubMed ID: 15495907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The effects of native prosodic system and segmental context on Cantonese tone perception by Mandarin and Japanese listeners.
    Zhu M; Chen X; Yang Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Jun; 149(6):4214. PubMed ID: 34241432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Prosodic phrasing is central to language comprehension.
    Frazier L; Carlson K; Clifton C
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2006 Jun; 10(6):244-9. PubMed ID: 16651019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Finding phrases: On the role of co-verbal facial information in learning word order in infancy.
    de la Cruz-Pavía I; Gervain J; Vatikiotis-Bateson E; Werker JF
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(11):e0224786. PubMed ID: 31710615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.