These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3880625)

  • 1. Digital processing of film radiographs.
    Sommer FG; Smathers RL; Wheat RL; Alvarez RE; Brody WR; Cassel DM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1985 Jan; 144(1):191-6. PubMed ID: 3880625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Digital and conventional chest images: observer performance with Film Digital Radiography System.
    Goodman LR; Foley WD; Wilson CR; Rimm AA; Lawson TL
    Radiology; 1986 Jan; 158(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 3940392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. For mammography, it's digital vs. screen-film.
    D'Orsi CJ; Karellas A
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1999 Nov; Suppl Digital():D16-8. PubMed ID: 10724730
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of breast masses using digitized images versus screen-film mammography.
    Liang Z; Du X; Liu J; Yao X; Yang Y; Li K
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):618-22. PubMed ID: 18568552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Film-screen digital radiography.
    Schwenker RP; Eger H
    Radiography; 1985; 51(598):233-5. PubMed ID: 4048409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Contrast mapping and evaluation for electronic X-ray images on CRT display monitor.
    Suzuki J; Furukawa I; Ono S; Kitamura M; Ando Y
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1997 Dec; 16(6):772-84. PubMed ID: 9533578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Digital radiography--methods and clinical application].
    Schuler M; Rath M; Hahn D; Rienmüller R; Lissner J
    Digitale Bilddiagn; 1985 Mar; 5(1):22-39. PubMed ID: 3886267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Digitizing and consolidating mammograms and other images for teaching applications.
    Bassignani MJ; LoRusso AP; Harvey JA
    Acad Radiol; 2006 Jun; 13(6):774-81. PubMed ID: 16679282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Image quality performance of liquid crystal display systems: influence of display resolution, magnification and window settings on contrast-detail detection.
    Bacher K; Smeets P; De Hauwere A; Voet T; Duyck P; Verstraete K; Thierens H
    Eur J Radiol; 2006 Jun; 58(3):471-9. PubMed ID: 16442770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Digital imaging of the chest.
    Merritt CR; Matthews CC; Scheinhorn D; Balter S
    J Thorac Imaging; 1985 Dec; 1(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 3916446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. V.2. X-ray-based medical imaging: X-ray projection technique, image subtraction method, direct digital X-ray imaging, computed tomography (CT).
    Niederer PF
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2010; 152():274-301. PubMed ID: 20407200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Evaluation of underexposed conventional x-ray films following digitization].
    Wenz W; Buitrago-Téllez C; Mönig H; Niemeier R
    Radiologe; 1993 Feb; 33(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 8469760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Gray-scale and geometric registration of full-field digital and film-screen mammograms.
    Snoeren PR; Karssemeijer N
    Med Image Anal; 2007 Apr; 11(2):146-56. PubMed ID: 17208511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dual energy subtraction and temporal subtraction chest radiography.
    MacMahon H; Li F; Engelmann R; Roberts R; Armato S
    J Thorac Imaging; 2008 May; 23(2):77-85. PubMed ID: 18520564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Digital radiography: fundamentals and future potentials].
    Doi K
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Jan; 49(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 2660097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of optical unsharp masking and contrast enhancement of low-scatter chest radiographs.
    Sorenson JA; Mitchell CR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1987 Aug; 149(2):275-81. PubMed ID: 3496751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Computer-aided image manipulation of intraoral radiographs to enhance diagnosis in dental practice: a review.
    Wenzel A
    Int Dent J; 1993 Apr; 43(2):99-108. PubMed ID: 8320010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Digital mammography is very useful in mass screening of breast cancer].
    Nab HW; Karssemeijer N; van Erning LJ; Verbeek AL; Hendriks JH
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1990 Dec; 134(49):2383-7. PubMed ID: 2263263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Evaluation of CRT images of digitized film angiographs].
    Mashita S; Ishigaki T; Ikeda M; Sakuma S
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Aug; 49(8):1025-37. PubMed ID: 2594482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Breast imaging: dual-energy projection radiography with digital radiography.
    Asaga T; Chiyasu S; Mastuda S; Mastuura H; Kato H; Ishida M; Komaki T
    Radiology; 1987 Sep; 164(3):869-70. PubMed ID: 3303124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.