These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38806588)

  • 21. Unanticipated questions can yield unanticipated outcomes in investigative interviews.
    Parkhouse T; Ormerod TC
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(12):e0208751. PubMed ID: 30532180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Lie-specific involvement of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in deception.
    Priori A; Mameli F; Cogiamanian F; Marceglia S; Tiriticco M; Mrakic-Sposta S; Ferrucci R; Zago S; Polezzi D; Sartori G
    Cereb Cortex; 2008 Feb; 18(2):451-5. PubMed ID: 17584853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Types of deception revealed by individual differences in cognitive abilities.
    Morgan CJ; LeSage JB; Kosslyn SM
    Soc Neurosci; 2009; 4(6):554-69. PubMed ID: 18654937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The detection of faked identity using unexpected questions and choice reaction times.
    Monaro M; Zampieri I; Sartori G; Pietrini P; Orrù G
    Psychol Res; 2021 Sep; 85(6):2474-2482. PubMed ID: 32886169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex specifically processes general - but not personal - knowledge deception: Multiple brain networks for lying.
    Mameli F; Mrakic-Sposta S; Vergari M; Fumagalli M; Macis M; Ferrucci R; Nordio F; Consonni D; Sartori G; Priori A
    Behav Brain Res; 2010 Aug; 211(2):164-8. PubMed ID: 20307584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Accuracy of deception judgments.
    Bond CF; DePaulo BM
    Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2006; 10(3):214-34. PubMed ID: 16859438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Efficacy of combining interview techniques in detecting deception related to bio-threat issues.
    Morgan CA; Rabinowitz Y; Leidy R; Coric V
    Behav Sci Law; 2014; 32(3):269-85. PubMed ID: 24549687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [fMRI study of deliberate deception].
    Kireev MV; Korotkov AD; Medvedev CV
    Fiziol Cheloveka; 2012; 38(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 22567835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Subjective cues to deception/honesty in a high stakes situation: an exploratory approach.
    Wright Whelan C; Wagstaff GF; Wheatcroft JM
    J Psychol; 2015; 149(5):517-34. PubMed ID: 25975577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Studies on the ERP underlying premeditated and temporary deception].
    Ji S; Liu P; Shen H; Li W; Bian Z
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2012 Apr; 29(2):272-6. PubMed ID: 22616173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Lie to my face: An electromyography approach to the study of deceptive behavior.
    Shuster A; Inzelberg L; Ossmy O; Izakson L; Hanein Y; Levy DJ
    Brain Behav; 2021 Dec; 11(12):e2386. PubMed ID: 34677007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Decreased respiratory sinus arrhythmia in individuals with deceptive intent.
    Aikins DE; Martin DJ; Morgan CA
    Psychophysiology; 2010 Jul; 47(4):633-6. PubMed ID: 20230501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Subliminal salience search illustrated: EEG identity and deception detection on the fringe of awareness.
    Bowman H; Filetti M; Janssen D; Su L; Alsufyani A; Wyble B
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(1):e54258. PubMed ID: 23372697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Learning to Detect Deception from Evasive Answers and Inconsistencies across Repeated Interviews: A Study with Lay Respondents and Police Officers.
    Masip J; Martínez C; Blandón-Gitlin I; Sánchez N; Herrero C; Ibabe I
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():2207. PubMed ID: 29354078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Interview based connectivity analysis of EEG in order to detect deception.
    Daneshi Kohan M; Motie Nasrabadi A; Sharifi A; Bagher Shamsollahi M
    Med Hypotheses; 2020 Mar; 136():109517. PubMed ID: 31835208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Being accurate about accuracy in verbal deception detection.
    Kleinberg B; Arntz A; Verschuere B
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(8):e0220228. PubMed ID: 31393894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. It's the deceiver, not the receiver: No individual differences when detecting deception in a foreign and a native language.
    Law MKH; Jackson SA; Aidman E; Geiger M; Olderbak S; Kleitman S
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(5):e0196384. PubMed ID: 29723243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Cues to deception in context: response latency/gaps in denials and blame shifting.
    Reynolds E; Rendle-Short J
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2011 Sep; 50(3):431-49. PubMed ID: 21884543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The self in conflict: the role of executive processes during truthful and deceptive responses about attitudes.
    Johnson R; Henkell H; Simon E; Zhu J
    Neuroimage; 2008 Jan; 39(1):469-82. PubMed ID: 17919934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Lying in the scanner: covert countermeasures disrupt deception detection by functional magnetic resonance imaging.
    Ganis G; Rosenfeld JP; Meixner J; Kievit RA; Schendan HE
    Neuroimage; 2011 Mar; 55(1):312-9. PubMed ID: 21111834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.