These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38806852)

  • 1. The Crosswise Model for Surveys on Sensitive Topics: A General Framework for Item Selection and Statistical Analysis.
    Gregori M; De Jong MG; Pieters R
    Psychometrika; 2024 Sep; 89(3):1007-1033. PubMed ID: 38806852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nothing but the truth? Effects of faking on the validity of the crosswise model.
    Hoffmann A; Meisters J; Musch J
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(10):e0258603. PubMed ID: 34714838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sensitivity of Crosswise Model to Simplistic Selection of Nonsensitive Questions: An Application to Estimate Substance Use, Alcohol Consumption and Extramarital Sex Among Iranian College Students.
    Safiri S; Rahimi-Movaghar A; Mansournia MA; Yunesian M; Shamsipour M; Sadeghi-Bazargani H; Fotouhi A
    Subst Use Misuse; 2019; 54(4):601-611. PubMed ID: 30595063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Detecting nonadherence without loss in efficiency: A simple extension of the crosswise model.
    Heck DW; Hoffmann A; Moshagen M
    Behav Res Methods; 2018 Oct; 50(5):1895-1905. PubMed ID: 28916924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Controlling social desirability bias: An experimental investigation of the extended crosswise model.
    Meisters J; Hoffmann A; Musch J
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0243384. PubMed ID: 33284820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Can detailed instructions and comprehension checks increase the validity of crosswise model estimates?
    Meisters J; Hoffmann A; Musch J
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(6):e0235403. PubMed ID: 32603352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Poisson and negative binomial item count techniques for surveys with sensitive question.
    Tian GL; Tang ML; Wu Q; Liu Y
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Apr; 26(2):931-947. PubMed ID: 25519889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimates of Lifetime Extradyadic Sex Using a Hybrid of Randomized Response Technique and Crosswise Design.
    Tu SH; Hsieh SH
    Arch Sex Behav; 2017 Feb; 46(2):373-384. PubMed ID: 27164895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Potential application of item-response theory to interpretation of medical codes in electronic patient records.
    Dregan A; Grieve A; van Staa T; Gulliford MC;
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2011 Dec; 11():168. PubMed ID: 22176509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [An item response model for the experimental design].
    Shojima K
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2003 Feb; 73(6):506-11. PubMed ID: 12728703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sample size determination for interval estimation of the prevalence of a sensitive attribute under non-randomized response models.
    Qiu SF; Lei J; Poon WY; Tang ML; Wong RS; Tao JR
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2024 Nov; 77(3):508-531. PubMed ID: 38409814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using Rasch Analysis to Assess and Improve the Measurement Properties of a Questionnaire With Few Items: The York Binaural Hearing-Related Quality of Life (YBHRQL) Questionnaire.
    Summerfield AQ; Kitterick PT
    Ear Hear; 2023 Nov-Dec 01; 44(6):1526-1539. PubMed ID: 37358331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Linking self-perceived cognitive functioning questionnaires using item response theory: The subjective cognitive decline initiative.
    Rabin LA; Sikkes SAM; Tommet D; Jones RN; Crane PK; Elbulok-Charcape MM; Dubbelman MA; Koscik R; Amariglio RE; Buckley RF; Boada M; Chételat G; Dubois B; Ellis KA; Gifford KA; Jefferson AL; Jessen F; Johnson S; Katz MJ; Lipton RB; Luck T; Margioti E; Maruff P; Molinuevo JL; Perrotin A; Petersen RC; Rami L; Reisberg B; Rentz DM; Riedel-Heller SG; Risacher SL; Rodriguez-Gomez O; Sachdev PS; Saykin AJ; Scarmeas N; Smart C; Snitz BE; Sperling RA; Taler V; van der Flier WM; van Harten AC; Wagner M; Wolfsgruber S; ; ;
    Neuropsychology; 2023 May; 37(4):463-499. PubMed ID: 37276136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Experimental validation of specialized questioning techniques in conservation.
    Ibbett H; Dorward L; Dwiyahreni AA; Jones JPG; Kaduma J; Kohi EM; Mchomvu J; Prayitno K; Sabiladiyni H; Sankeni S; Saputra AW; Supriatna J; St John FAV
    Conserv Biol; 2022 Oct; 36(5):e13908. PubMed ID: 35288991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bayesian hierarchical response time modelling-A tutorial.
    Koenig C; Becker B; Ulitzsch E
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2023 Nov; 76(3):623-645. PubMed ID: 36811176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Poisson item count techniques with noncompliance.
    Wu Q; Tang ML; Fung DW; Tian GL
    Stat Med; 2020 Dec; 39(29):4480-4498. PubMed ID: 32909318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Investigating psychometric properties and dimensional structure of an educational environment measure (DREEM) using Mokken scale analysis - a pragmatic approach.
    Palmgren PJ; Brodin U; Nilsson GH; Watson R; Stenfors T
    BMC Med Educ; 2018 Oct; 18(1):235. PubMed ID: 30305143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing the validity of two indirect questioning techniques: A Stochastic Lie Detector versus the Crosswise Model.
    Hoffmann A; Musch J
    Behav Res Methods; 2016 Sep; 48(3):1032-46. PubMed ID: 26182857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The potential synergy between cognitive models and modern psychometric models.
    Bjorner JB; Ware JE; Kosinski M
    Qual Life Res; 2003 May; 12(3):261-74. PubMed ID: 12769138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.