251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3880828)
21. [Long-term patency of reversed and in situ femoro-popliteal bypasses].
Marković DM; Davidović LB; Lotina SI; Kostić DM; Cinara IS; Svetković SD; Marković M; Zivanović N
Srp Arh Celok Lek; 1999; 127(11-12):365-70. PubMed ID: 10686817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Composite sequential grafts for femorocrural bypass reconstruction: experience with a modified technique.
Mahmood A; Garnham A; Sintler M; Smith SR; Vohra RK; Simms MH
J Vasc Surg; 2002 Oct; 36(4):772-8. PubMed ID: 12368738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Pedal bypass versus tibial bypass with autogenous vein: a comparison of outcome and hemodynamic results.
Schneider JR; Walsh DB; McDaniel MD; Zwolak RM; Besso SR; Cronenwett JL
J Vasc Surg; 1993 Jun; 17(6):1029-38; discussion 1038-40. PubMed ID: 8505781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Midterm results of autologous saphenous vein and ePTFE pre-cuffed bypass surgery in peripheral arterial occlusive disease.
Donker JM; Ho GH; Te Slaa A; de Groot HG; van der Waal JC; Veen EJ; van der Laan L
Vasc Endovascular Surg; 2011 Oct; 45(7):598-603. PubMed ID: 21757494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Popliteal-crural bypass through the posterior approach with lesser saphenous vein for limb salvage.
Goyal A; Shah PM; Babu SC; Mateo RB
J Vasc Surg; 2002 Oct; 36(4):708-12. PubMed ID: 12368730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Patency of autogenous saphenous vein versus polytetrafluoroethylene grafts in femoropopliteal bypass for advanced ischemia of the extremity.
Bennion RS; Williams RA; Stabile BE; Fox MA; Owens ML; Wilson SE
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1985 Mar; 160(3):239-42. PubMed ID: 3975795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A decade of experience with dorsalis pedis artery bypass: analysis of outcome in more than 1000 cases.
Pomposelli FB; Kansal N; Hamdan AD; Belfield A; Sheahan M; Campbell DR; Skillman JJ; Logerfo FW
J Vasc Surg; 2003 Feb; 37(2):307-15. PubMed ID: 12563200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. In situ saphenous vein arterial bypass for infrainguinal revascularization: initial experience using an open technique.
de Mello AV; Santos CM; Silva JL; Souza MT; Portilho MA; Guimarães AV; Freitas RG; Silvério JW
Int Angiol; 1991; 10(3):126-32. PubMed ID: 1765713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Vein versus polytetrafluoroethylene in above-knee femoropopliteal bypass grafting: five-year results of a randomized controlled trial.
Klinkert P; Schepers A; Burger DH; van Bockel JH; Breslau PJ
J Vasc Surg; 2003 Jan; 37(1):149-55. PubMed ID: 12514593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Remote arteriovenous fistula with infrapopliteal polytetrafluoroethylene bypass for critical ischemia.
Ricco JB; Gauthier JB; Richer JP; Carretier M; Barbier J
Ann Vasc Surg; 1991 Nov; 5(6):525-8. PubMed ID: 1772758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Infrapopliteal arterial bypass for limb salvage: increased patency and utilization of the saphenous vein used "in situ".
Leather RP; Shan DM; Karmody AM
Surgery; 1981 Dec; 90(6):1000-8. PubMed ID: 7313935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Early experience utilizing the in situ saphenous vein technique in 54 patients.
Strayhorn EC; Wohlgemuth S; Deuel M; Glickman MH; Hurwitz RL
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 1988; 29(2):161-5. PubMed ID: 3360836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Results of arterial reconstruction of the foot.
Buchbinder D; Pasch AR; Rollins DL; Dillon BC; Douglas DJ; Schuler JJ; Flanigan DP
Arch Surg; 1986 Jun; 121(6):673-7. PubMed ID: 3707343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The in situ bypass above the knee.
Buchbinder D; Lloyd WE; Shah DM; Rollins DL; Semrow C; Leather RP
Ann Vasc Surg; 1989 Jul; 3(3):210-3. PubMed ID: 2775634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Sequential femoral-tibial bypass for severe limb ischemia.
Flinn WR; Flanigan DP; Verta MJ; Bergan JJ; Yao JS
Surgery; 1980 Sep; 88(3):357-65. PubMed ID: 7414513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Superficial femoral and popliteal arteries as inflow sites for distal bypasses.
Veith FJ; Gupta SK; Samson RH; Flores SW; Janko G; Scher LA
Surgery; 1981 Dec; 90(6):980-90. PubMed ID: 7313952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. In situ versus reversed saphenous vein for femoropopliteal bypass: a prospective randomized study of 100 cases.
Watelet J; Cheysson E; Poels D; Menard JF; Papion H; Saour N; Testart J
Ann Vasc Surg; 1987 May; 1(4):441-52. PubMed ID: 3504357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Femorotibial bypass grafts with sequential technique. Clinical results.
Jarrett F; Berkoff HA; Crummy AB; Belzer FO
Arch Surg; 1981 May; 116(5):709-14. PubMed ID: 7235965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Early patency of in situ saphenous vein bypasses as determined by intraoperative velocity waveform analysis.
Schmitt DD; Seabrook GR; Bandyk DF; Cato RF; Edwards JW; Karp DL; Block JL; Towne JB
Ann Vasc Surg; 1990 May; 4(3):270-5. PubMed ID: 2187518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Use of the in-situ lesser saphenous vein bypass from popliteal to peroneal artery.
Gelabert HA; Colburn MD; Moore WS
Ann Vasc Surg; 1997 Jul; 11(4):378-82. PubMed ID: 9236994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
