These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38808364)
1. Training framework for high-stakes OSCE: Experience from volunteer standardized patients' bank. Feigerlova E Clin Teach; 2024 Dec; 21(6):e13787. PubMed ID: 38808364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Training students to serve as standardized patients in an objective structured clinical examination is feasible: A mixed-methods study. Wu ML; Chao LF; Hung YT Nurse Educ Pract; 2024 Aug; 79():104069. PubMed ID: 39053150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A student-initiated objective structured clinical examination as a sustainable cost-effective learning experience. Lee CB; Madrazo L; Khan U; Thangarasa T; McConnell M; Khamisa K Med Educ Online; 2018 Dec; 23(1):1440111. PubMed ID: 29480155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pitfalls in training simulated patients to respond appropriately to questions from medical students in family history-taking activities: the current situation surrounding the training of simulated patients for learning activities at Nippon Medical School. Aso R; Inoue C; Yoshimura A; Shimura T J Nippon Med Sch; 2013; 80(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 23470807 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of portrayal by standardized patients: results from four OSCE stations conducted for high stakes examinations. Baig LA; Beran TN; Vallevand A; Baig ZA; Monroy-Cuadros M BMC Med Educ; 2014 May; 14():97. PubMed ID: 24884744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Standardized examinees: development of a new tool to evaluate factors influencing OSCE scores and to train examiners. Zimmermann P; Kadmon M GMS J Med Educ; 2020; 37(4):Doc40. PubMed ID: 32685668 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Objectivity in subjectivity: do students' self and peer assessments correlate with examiners' subjective and objective assessment in clinical skills? A prospective study. Inayah AT; Anwer LA; Shareef MA; Nurhussen A; Alkabbani HM; Alzahrani AA; Obad AS; Zafar M; Afsar NA BMJ Open; 2017 May; 7(5):e012289. PubMed ID: 28487454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Incorporating patient partner scores into high stakes assessment: an observational study into opinions and attitudes. Thomson FC; MacKenzie RK; Anderson M; Denison AR; Currie GP BMC Med Educ; 2017 Nov; 17(1):214. PubMed ID: 29141624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Medical student experience as simulated patients in the OSCE. Burgess A; Clark T; Chapman R; Mellis C Clin Teach; 2013 Aug; 10(4):246-50. PubMed ID: 23834571 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Performance pressure: simulated patients and high-stakes examinations in a regional clinical school. Harvey P; Radomski N Aust J Rural Health; 2011 Dec; 19(6):284-9. PubMed ID: 22098211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. CARECOS study: Medical students' empathy as assessed with the CARE measure by examiners versus standardized patients during a formative Objective and Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) station. Dufayet L; Piot MA; Geoffroy PA; Oulès B; Petitjean-Brichant C; Peiffer-Smadja N; Bouzid D; Tran Dinh A; Mirault T; Faye A; Lemogne C; Ruszniewski P; Peyre H; Vodovar D Med Teach; 2024 Sep; 46(9):1187-1195. PubMed ID: 38285021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of medical training scenarios on heart rate variability and motivation in students and simulated patients. Rieber N; Betz L; Enck P; Muth E; Nikendei C; Schrauth M; Werner A; Kowalski A; Zipfel S Med Educ; 2009 Jun; 43(6):553-6. PubMed ID: 19493179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Do Standardized Patients Have Concerns About Students Not Captured by Traditional Assessment Forms? Blatt B; Plack M; Simmens S; Lopreiato J; Berg K; Klevan J; Lewis K Teach Learn Med; 2016; 28(4):395-405. PubMed ID: 27152446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessing medical students' communication skills by the use of standardized patients: emphasizing standardized patients' quality assurance. Shirazi M; Labaf A; Monjazebi F; Jalili M; Mirzazadeh M; Ponzer S; Masiello I Acad Psychiatry; 2014 Jun; 38(3):354-60. PubMed ID: 24777713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation using simulated students for reliability of multiple standardized-patients scoring in clinical performance examinations. Park WB; Lee SA; Kim EA; Gwack J; Yoo KY; Shin JS; Lee YS Med Teach; 2007 Nov; 29(9):978-80. PubMed ID: 18158676 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Augmenting physician examiner scoring in objective structured clinical examinations: including the standardized patient perspective. Roy M; Wojcik J; Bartman I; Smee S Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2021 Mar; 26(1):313-328. PubMed ID: 32816242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Twelve tips for developing an OSCE that measures what you want. Daniels VJ; Pugh D Med Teach; 2018 Dec; 40(12):1208-1213. PubMed ID: 29069965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Implementation of an OSCE at Kaohsiung Medical University. Huang YS; Liu M; Huang CH; Liu KM Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2007 Apr; 23(4):161-9. PubMed ID: 17395563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Performance-Based Assessment in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Residency Training. Aras S; Serim Demirgören B Acad Psychiatry; 2022 Feb; 46(1):31-39. PubMed ID: 34128192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bringing a Structural Competency Framework to the (Simulated) Bedside: The Premature Discharge Objective Structured Clinical Exam. Ramsdell AK; Hupert N; Abramson E; Safdieh JE; Katz S Acad Med; 2024 Aug; 99(8):857-862. PubMed ID: 38728682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]