These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38809024)

  • 1. Exploring the existence, strength, and independence of relative age and maturation selection biases: a case study in Gaelic football talent development programmes.
    Fitzgerald F; Campbell M; Kearney PE; Cumming S
    Ann Hum Biol; 2024 Feb; 51(1):2349040. PubMed ID: 38809024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Relative age and maturation selection biases in academy football.
    Hill M; Scott S; Malina RM; McGee D; Cumming SP
    J Sports Sci; 2020; 38(11-12):1359-1367. PubMed ID: 31366286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [The assessment of biological maturation for talent selection - which method can be used?].
    Müller L; Müller E; Hildebrandt C; Kapelari K; Raschner C
    Sportverletz Sportschaden; 2015 Mar; 29(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 25710395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Age and Maturation Matter in Youth Elite Soccer, but Depending on Competitive Level and Gender.
    Ginés HJ; Huertas F; García Calvo T; Ponce-Bordón JC; Figueiredo AJ; Ballester R
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 Jan; 20(3):. PubMed ID: 36767382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Yo-Yo Intermittent Recovery Test Performance in Subelite Gaelic Football Players From Under Thirteen to Senior Age Groups.
    Roe M; Malone S
    J Strength Cond Res; 2016 Nov; 30(11):3187-3193. PubMed ID: 26982971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The maturity status but not the relative age influences elite young football players' physical performance.
    Peña-González I; Javaloyes A; Cervelló E; Moya-Ramón M
    Sci Med Footb; 2022 Aug; 6(3):309-316. PubMed ID: 35277114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The confounding effect of biological maturity on talent identification and selection within youth Australian football.
    Toum M; Tribolet R; Watsford ML; Fransen J
    Sci Med Footb; 2021 Nov; 5(4):263-271. PubMed ID: 35077301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Player-labelling as a solution to overcome maturation selection biases in youth football.
    Lüdin D; Donath L; Cobley S; Mann D; Romann M
    J Sports Sci; 2022 Jul; 40(14):1641-1647. PubMed ID: 35969578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Selection into youth cricket academies: The influence of relative age and maturity status.
    Radnor JM; Oliver JL; Dobbs I; Wong M; Brown TW; Lloyd RS; Kelly AL
    J Sports Sci; 2023 Feb; 41(3):272-279. PubMed ID: 37163466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Relative age effects in Swiss talent development - a nationwide analysis of all sports.
    Romann M; Rössler R; Javet M; Faude O
    J Sports Sci; 2018 Sep; 36(17):2025-2031. PubMed ID: 29392997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. One of these things is not like the other: time to differentiate between relative age and biological maturity selection biases in soccer?
    Towlson C; MacMaster C; Parr J; Cumming S
    Sci Med Footb; 2022 Aug; 6(3):273-276. PubMed ID: 35866421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of age-policy changes on the relative age effect across the Australian Rules football talent pathway.
    Haycraft JAZ; Kovalchik S; Pyne DB; Larkin P; Robertson S
    J Sci Med Sport; 2018 Oct; 21(10):1106-1111. PubMed ID: 29622491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The relative age effect in the Gaelic Athletic Association (GAA): a mixed methods approach.
    Queeney JR; Kelly AL; McGourty P; Horgan P
    Sci Med Footb; 2023 Aug; 7(3):242-252. PubMed ID: 35787228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of Biological Maturity on the Match Performance of 8- to 16-Year-Old, Elite, Male, Youth Soccer Players.
    Goto H; Morris JG; Nevill ME
    J Strength Cond Res; 2019 Nov; 33(11):3078-3084. PubMed ID: 29461418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The selection advantages associated with advanced biological maturation vary according to playing position in national-level youth soccer.
    Sweeney L; Cumming SP; MacNamara Á; Horan D
    Biol Sport; 2023 Jul; 40(3):715-722. PubMed ID: 37398961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Relative age and biological maturity-related selection biases in male youth soccer across different competitive levels within a national association.
    Sweeney L; Lundberg TR
    Sci Med Footb; 2024 Jun; ():1-9. PubMed ID: 38909319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of bio-banding on physiological and technical-tactical key performance indicators in youth elite soccer.
    Lüdin D; Donath L; Cobley S; Romann M
    Eur J Sport Sci; 2022 Nov; 22(11):1659-1667. PubMed ID: 34542017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Talent Selection Based on Sport-Specific Tasks Is Affected by the Relative Age Effects among Adolescent Handball Players.
    Tróznai Z; Utczás K; Pápai J; Négele Z; Juhász I; Szabó T; Petridis L
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Oct; 18(21):. PubMed ID: 34769935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The relative age effect in the German Football TID Programme: biases in motor performance diagnostics and effects on single motor abilities and skills in groups of selected players.
    Votteler A; Höner O
    Eur J Sport Sci; 2014; 14(5):433-42. PubMed ID: 24047192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Running and Technical Performance of U13 to U18 Elite Japanese Soccer Players During Match Play.
    Goto H; Saward C
    J Strength Cond Res; 2020 Jun; 34(6):1564-1573. PubMed ID: 31498224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.