These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3880915)

  • 1. Use of femur length/abdominal circumference ratio in detecting the macrosomic fetus.
    Hadlock FP; Harrist RB; Fearneyhough TC; Deter RL; Park SK; Rossavik IK
    Radiology; 1985 Feb; 154(2):503-5. PubMed ID: 3880915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ratios between the abdominal circumference, head circumference, or femur length and the transverse cerebellar diameter of the growth-retarded and macrosomic fetus.
    Hill LM; Guzick D; DiNofrio D; Maloney J; Merolillo C; Nedzesky P
    Am J Perinatol; 1994 Mar; 11(2):144-8. PubMed ID: 8198657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Femur length/abdominal circumference ratio. Poor predictor of macrosomic fetuses in diabetic mothers.
    Benson CB; Doubilet PM; Saltzman DH; Greene MF; Jones TB
    J Ultrasound Med; 1986 Mar; 5(3):141-4. PubMed ID: 3517361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A date-independent predictor of intrauterine growth retardation: femur length/abdominal circumference ratio.
    Hadlock FP; Deter RL; Harrist RB; Roecker E; Park SK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1983 Nov; 141(5):979-84. PubMed ID: 6605074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diabetic macrosomia: accuracy of third trimester ultrasound.
    Tamura RK; Sabbagha RE; Depp R; Dooley SL; Socol ML
    Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Jun; 67(6):828-32. PubMed ID: 3517726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Correctly identifying the macrosomic fetus: improving ultrasonography-based prediction.
    Sokol RJ; Chik L; Dombrowski MP; Zador IE
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Jun; 182(6):1489-95. PubMed ID: 10871470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ultrasonic fetal weight prediction: role of head circumference and femur length.
    Weiner CP; Sabbagha RE; Vaisrub N; Socol ML
    Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Jun; 65(6):812-7. PubMed ID: 3889747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intrapartum fetal subcutaneous tissue/femur length ratio: an ultrasonographic clue to fetal macrosomia.
    Santolaya-Forgas J; Meyer WJ; Gauthier DW; Kahn D
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Oct; 171(4):1072-5. PubMed ID: 7943073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Abnormal growth patterns in diabetes in pregnancy: a longitudinal study.
    Langer O; Kozlowski S; Brustman L
    Isr J Med Sci; 1991; 27(8-9):516-23. PubMed ID: 1960050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy of ultrasonic fetal weight estimation and detection of small for gestational age fetuses.
    Palo P; Erkkola R; Piiroinen O; Ruotsalainen P
    Am J Perinatol; 1989 Oct; 6(4):400-4. PubMed ID: 2675872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fetal weight estimates in diabetic gravid women.
    Miller JM; Brown HL; Khawli OF; Korndorffer FA; Gabert HA
    J Clin Ultrasound; 1988 Oct; 16(8):569-72. PubMed ID: 3152401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Screening efficacy of the subcutaneous tissue width/femur length ratio for fetal macrosomia in the non-diabetic pregnancy.
    Rotmensch S; Celentano C; Liberati M; Malinger G; Sadan O; Bellati U; Glezerman M
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 May; 13(5):340-4. PubMed ID: 10380299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Weight estimation for low birth weight fetuses and macrosomic fetuses in Chinese population.
    Chen P; Yu J; Li X; Wang Y; Chang C
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Sep; 284(3):599-606. PubMed ID: 21046133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reference charts and equations of Korean fetal biometry.
    Jung SI; Lee YH; Moon MH; Song MJ; Min JY; Kim JA; Park JH; Yang JH; Kim MY; Chung JH; Cho JY; Kim KG
    Prenat Diagn; 2007 Jun; 27(6):545-51. PubMed ID: 17431930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Value of a single early third trimester fetal biometry for the prediction of birth weight deviations in a low risk population.
    De Reu PA; Smits LJ; Oosterbaan HP; Nijhuis JG
    J Perinat Med; 2008; 36(4):324-9. PubMed ID: 18598122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Relationship between fetal growth and maternal fructosamine in diabetic pregnancy.
    Roberts AB; Baker JR
    Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Aug; 70(2):242-6. PubMed ID: 3299183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ultrasonic recognition of the small-for-gestational-age fetus.
    Brown HL; Miller JM; Gabert HA; Kissling G
    Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Apr; 69(4):631-5. PubMed ID: 3547215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prenatal prediction of neonatal growth status in twins using individualized growth assessment.
    Deter RL; Xu B; Milner LL
    J Clin Ultrasound; 1996 Feb; 24(2):53-9. PubMed ID: 8621807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Study of abdominal circumference proportions in fetuses with growth disorders.
    Morales-Roselló J; León-Mendoza MT
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2005 Jun; 272(1):40-2. PubMed ID: 15549335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of maternal cigarette smoking on fetal growth and body composition.
    Bernstein IM; Plociennik K; Stahle S; Badger GJ; Secker-Walker R
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Oct; 183(4):883-6. PubMed ID: 11035331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.