184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38809551)
41. Association of Highly Restrictive State Abortion Policies With Abortion Rates, 2000-2014.
Brown BP; Hebert LE; Gilliam M; Kaestner R
JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Nov; 3(11):e2024610. PubMed ID: 33165610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. A national analysis of ED presentations for early pregnancy and complications: Implications for post-Roe America.
Goodwin G; Marra E; Ramdin C; Alexander AB; Ye PP; Nelson LS; Mazer-Amirshahi M
Am J Emerg Med; 2023 Aug; 70():90-95. PubMed ID: 37245403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Abortion in the United States, 1977-1978.
Forrest JD; Sullivan E; Tietze C
Fam Plann Perspect; 1979; 11(6):329-41. PubMed ID: 401078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Perceptions of abortion access across the United States prior to the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization decision: Results from a national survey.
Crawford BL; Simmons MK; Turner RC; Lo WJ; Jozkowski KN
Perspect Sex Reprod Health; 2023 Sep; 55(3):153-164. PubMed ID: 37475195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. US Obstetrician-Gynecologists' Perceived Impacts of Post-Dobbs v Jackson State Abortion Bans.
Sabbath EL; McKetchnie SM; Arora KS; Buchbinder M
JAMA Netw Open; 2024 Jan; 7(1):e2352109. PubMed ID: 38231510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Barriers around access to abortion experienced by rural women in New South Wales, Australia.
Doran FM; Hornibrook J
Rural Remote Health; 2016; 16(1):3538. PubMed ID: 26987999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Short-Term Changes in Vasectomy Consults and Procedures Following
Zhu A; Nam CS; Gingrich D; Patel N; Black K; Andino JJ; Daignault-Newton S; Telang J; Dupree JM; Quallich S; Ohl D; Hadj-Moussa M
Urol Pract; 2024 May; 11(3):517-525. PubMed ID: 38315830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Trends in interstate abortion travel to Oregon following the Dobbs court decision.
Fuerst M; Mandelbaum A; Nacev E; Rodriguez M
Contraception; 2024 Jun; ():110520. PubMed ID: 38897431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Public health and clinical implications of Dobbs v. Jackson for patients and healthcare providers: A scoping review.
Zhu DT; Zhao L; Alzoubi T; Shenin N; Baskaran T; Tikhonov J; Wang C
PLoS One; 2024; 19(3):e0288947. PubMed ID: 38551970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. The impact of Mississippi's mandatory delay law on the timing of abortion.
Joyce T; Kaestner R
Fam Plann Perspect; 2000; 32(1):4-13. PubMed ID: 10710701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Judicial bypass for minors post-
Horvath S; Frietsche S
Womens Health (Lond); 2023; 19():17455057231219601. PubMed ID: 38146197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Legal barriers to second-trimester abortion provision and public health consequences.
Jones BS; Weitz TA
Am J Public Health; 2009 Apr; 99(4):623-30. PubMed ID: 19197087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. "It was as if society didn't want a woman to get an abortion": a qualitative study in Istanbul, Turkey.
MacFarlane KA; O'Neil ML; Tekdemir D; Foster AM
Contraception; 2017 Feb; 95(2):154-160. PubMed ID: 27477064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Impact of post-Dobbs abortion restrictions on maternal-fetal medicine physicians in the Southeast: a qualitative study.
Schultz A; Smith C; Johnson M; Bryant A; Buchbinder M
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2024 May; 6(7):101387. PubMed ID: 38772442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Border-state abortions increased for Texas residents after House Bill 2.
Raifman S; Sierra G; Grossman D; Baum SE; Hopkins K; Potter JE; White K
Contraception; 2021 Sep; 104(3):314-318. PubMed ID: 33762170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Trends in Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Applications in the Year After Abortion Access Changes.
Hammoud MM; Morgan HK; George K; Ollendorff AT; Dalrymple JL; Dunleavy D; Zhu M; Banks E; Akingbola BA; Connolly A
JAMA Netw Open; 2024 Feb; 7(2):e2355017. PubMed ID: 38324311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Abortion surveillance--United States, 2008.
Pazol K; Zane SB; Parker WY; Hall LR; Berg C; Cook DA;
MMWR Surveill Summ; 2011 Nov; 60(15):1-41. PubMed ID: 22108620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. The impact of Mississippi's mandatory delay law on abortions and births.
Joyce T; Henshaw SK; Skatrud JD
JAMA; 1997 Aug; 278(8):653-8. PubMed ID: 9272897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Watching the fall of Roe v. Wade: Media exposure relates to U.S. women's alcohol use intentions.
Post SM; Jobe MC; Malekzadeh AN; AuBuchon KE; Hoffman RK; Stock ML; Bowleg L
Psychol Addict Behav; 2024 Mar; 38(2):197-204. PubMed ID: 37676169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Evaluating participant engagement in a preconception cohort study in relation to the Dobbs decision.
Willis MD; Hoffman MN; Wang TR; Sabbath EL; Kuriyama AS; Wesselink AK; Wise LA
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38666636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
