These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38809551)

  • 101. Understanding abortion seeking care outside of formal health care settings in Cape Town, South Africa: a qualitative study.
    Harries J; Daskilewicz K; Bessenaar T; Gerdts C
    Reprod Health; 2021 Sep; 18(1):190. PubMed ID: 34556120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 102. Beyond Roe, after Casey: the present and future of a "fundamental" right.
    Benshoof J
    Womens Health Issues; 1993; 3(3):162-70. PubMed ID: 8274872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 103. Tubal Sterilization Requests at a Single Institution Following the Supreme Court Decision to Overturn the Constitutional Right to Abortion.
    Liang AC; Gliwa C; Loder CM; Dalton VK; Smith RD
    JAMA; 2023 Jul; 330(4):374-375. PubMed ID: 37490094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 104. Abortion Surveillance - United States, 2016.
    Jatlaoui TC; Eckhaus L; Mandel MG; Nguyen A; Oduyebo T; Petersen E; Whiteman MK
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2019 Nov; 68(11):1-41. PubMed ID: 31774741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 105. The state of abortion rights in the US.
    Davis MF
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2022 Oct; 159(1):324-329. PubMed ID: 35975678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 106. Family planning service provision in rural areas: a survey in Washington State.
    Dobie SA; Gober L; Rosenblatt RA
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1998; 30(3):139-42, 147. PubMed ID: 9635263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 107. State restrictions on abortion are associated with fewer abortions in patients with high-risk cardiovascular conditions.
    Abernathy A; Schreiber CA; Srinivas SK
    Contraception; 2023 Aug; 124():110057. PubMed ID: 37146867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 108. Comparison of Childless and Partnerless Vasectomy Rates Before and After
    Nguyen V; Li MK; Leach MC; Patel DP; Hsieh TC
    Am J Mens Health; 2024; 18(3):15579883241260511. PubMed ID: 38872304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 109. Women's Experience Obtaining Abortion Care in Texas after Implementation of Restrictive Abortion Laws: A Qualitative Study.
    Baum SE; White K; Hopkins K; Potter JE; Grossman D
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0165048. PubMed ID: 27783708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 110. Post-
    Wang Y; Weiss KJ
    Psychiatr Serv; 2024 Jul; 75(7):710-712. PubMed ID: 38835251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 111. Trends over 50 years with liberal abortion laws in the Nordic countries.
    Skjeldestad FE; Gissler M; Geirsson RT; Heino A; Sigbjörnsdottir HB; Akerkar R; Gemzell-Danielsson K; Heikinheimo O; Løkeland M
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(7):e0305701. PubMed ID: 38985688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 112. Abortion Care After the Dobbs Decision: An Academic Health System's Response to a Statewide Ban.
    Larin KQ; Rouse CE; Bernard C; Castor TC; Kremer B; Ingram DA
    Acad Med; 2024 Apr; 99(4):388-394. PubMed ID: 38166333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 113. Bridging the Knowledge Gap: A Toolkit on Reproductive Rights for Pediatric Surgeons in the Post-Dobbs Era.
    Mannava SV; Brar A; Patwardhan U; Godfrey J; Berdan E; Gow K; Knod JL
    J Pediatr Surg; 2024 Jul; 59(7):1374-1377. PubMed ID: 38589273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 114. Attitudes, concerns, and perceptions of patients undergoing fertility treatments in an abortion restrictive state in the aftermath of the Roe v. Wade reversal.
    Sharifi MF; Spurlin EE; Vatan N; Quinones H; Santana E; Omurtag KR; Jimenez PT
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2024 Jul; 41(7):1703-1711. PubMed ID: 38850329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 115. Transforming Pediatric Education in Response to Dobbs v. Jackson: Empowering Adolescents to Manage Their Reproductive Choices.
    Shubkin CD; Sieplinga K; Hunter RJ; Crichton KG
    Acad Pediatr; 2024 Apr; 24(3):381-384. PubMed ID: 37661081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 116. Public health and clinical implications of Dobbs v. Jackson for patients and healthcare providers: A scoping review.
    Zhu DT; Zhao L; Alzoubi T; Shenin N; Baskaran T; Tikhonov J; Wang C
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(3):e0288947. PubMed ID: 38551970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 117. Beneath the Sword of Damocles: Moral Obligations of Physicians in a Post-Dobbs Landscape.
    Lyerly AD; Faden RR; Mello MM
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2024 May; 54(3):15-27. PubMed ID: 38842894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 118. Vasectomy incidence in the military health system after the reversal of Roe v. Wade.
    Pierson BC; Banaag A; Janvrin ML; Koehlmoos TP
    Int J Impot Res; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38762601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 119. Osteopathic Medical Students' Concerns About the Future of Abortion Education and Training Post-Roe v. Wade.
    Zielinski P; Vilar N; Lewandowski T; Llerena GE; Nadery S; Jacobs RJ
    Cureus; 2024 May; 16(5):e60030. PubMed ID: 38854304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 120. Without Due Process of Law: The Dobbs Decision and Its Cataclysmic Impact on the Substantive Due Process and Privacy Rights of Ohio Women.
    Wenner J
    J Law Health; 2024; 37(2):187-213. PubMed ID: 38833601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.