159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38809815)
21. Prediction of maximal oxygen uptake from the ratings of perceived exertion and heart rate during a perceptually-regulated sub-maximal exercise test in active and sedentary participants.
Faulkner J; Parfitt G; Eston R
Eur J Appl Physiol; 2007 Oct; 101(3):397-407. PubMed ID: 17684757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The effect of glycogen reduction on cardiorespiratory and metabolic responses during downhill running.
Gavin JP; Myers SD; Willems ME
Eur J Appl Physiol; 2015 May; 115(5):1125-33. PubMed ID: 25552372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of heart rate and session rating of perceived exertion methods of defining exercise load in cyclists.
Rodríguez-Marroyo JA; Villa G; García-López J; Foster C
J Strength Cond Res; 2012 Aug; 26(8):2249-57. PubMed ID: 21997452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Validity of differentiated ratings of perceived exertion for use during aquatic cycling.
Fontanari P; Tartaruga MP; Caron O
J Sports Med Phys Fitness; 2021 May; 61(5):605-616. PubMed ID: 33528213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Prediction of peak oxygen uptake from ratings of perceived exertion during a sub-maximal cardiopulmonary exercise test in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Coquart JB; Eston RG; Lemaître F; Bart F; Tourny C; Grosbois JM
Eur J Appl Physiol; 2015 Feb; 115(2):365-72. PubMed ID: 25326178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Is Rating of Perceived Exertion a Valuable Tool for Monitoring Exercise Intensity During Steady-State Conditions in Elite Endurance Athletes?
Losnegard T; Skarli S; Hansen J; Roterud S; Svendsen IS; R Rønnestad B; Paulsen G
Int J Sports Physiol Perform; 2021 Nov; 16(11):1589-1595. PubMed ID: 33831841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Optimal exercise intensity in trained elderly men and women.
Deruelle F; Nourry C; Mucci P; Bart F; Grosbois JM; Lensel G; Fabre C
Int J Sports Med; 2007 Jul; 28(7):612-6. PubMed ID: 17373598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Influence of aerobic fitness on ratings of perceived exertion during graded and extended duration cycling.
Green JM; Pritchett RC; McLester JR; Crews TR; Tucker DC
J Sports Med Phys Fitness; 2007 Mar; 47(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 17369795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Omni Scale Perceived Exertion responses in obese and normal weight male adolescents during cycle exercise.
Balasekaran G; Loh MK; Govindaswamy VV; Cai SJ
J Sports Med Phys Fitness; 2014 Apr; 54(2):186-96. PubMed ID: 24509990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Physiological differences and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) in professional, amateur and young cyclists.
Pérez-Landaluce J; Fernández-García B; Rodríguez-Alonso M; García-Herrero F; García-Zapico P; Patterson AM; Terrados N
J Sports Med Phys Fitness; 2002 Dec; 42(4):389-95. PubMed ID: 12391431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Prediction of maximal oxygen uptake from submaximal ratings of perceived exertion and heart rate during a continuous exercise test: the efficacy of RPE 13.
Lambrick DM; Faulkner JA; Rowlands AV; Eston RG
Eur J Appl Physiol; 2009 Sep; 107(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 19488778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Influence of terminal RPE on session RPE.
Hornsby JH; Green JM; O'Neal EK; Killen LL; McIntosh JR; Coates TE
J Strength Cond Res; 2013 Oct; 27(10):2800-5. PubMed ID: 23302757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Cardiorespiratory and perceptual responses to self-regulated and imposed submaximal arm-leg ergometry.
Hill M; Talbot C; Puddiford M; Price M
Eur J Appl Physiol; 2018 May; 118(5):1011-1019. PubMed ID: 29511919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A Systematic Review of Submaximal Cycle Tests to Predict, Monitor, and Optimize Cycling Performance.
Capostagno B; Lambert MI; Lamberts RP
Int J Sports Physiol Perform; 2016 Sep; 11(6):707-714. PubMed ID: 27701968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effects of caffeine on session ratings of perceived exertion.
Killen LG; Green JM; O'Neal EK; McIntosh JR; Hornsby J; Coates TE
Eur J Appl Physiol; 2013 Mar; 113(3):721-7. PubMed ID: 22926324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Rating of perceived exertion in maximal incremental tests during head-out water-based aerobic exercises.
Alberton CL; Pinto SS; Gorski T; Antunes AH; Finatto P; Cadore EL; Bergamin M; Kruel LF
J Sports Sci; 2016 Sep; 34(18):1691-8. PubMed ID: 26759939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Metabolic parameters for ramp versus step incremental cycle ergometer tests.
Zuniga JM; Housh TJ; Camic CL; Bergstrom HC; Traylor DA; Schmidt RJ; Johnson GO
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab; 2012 Dec; 37(6):1110-7. PubMed ID: 22963385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Is it possible to individualize intensity of eccentric cycling exercise from perceived exertion on concentric test?
Laroche D; Joussain C; Espagnac C; Morisset C; Tordi N; Gremeaux V; Casillas JM
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2013 Aug; 94(8):1621-1627.e1. PubMed ID: 23270934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Ratings of Perceived Exertion and Physiological Responses in Children During Exercise.
Erichsen JM; Dykstra BJ; Hidde MC; Mahon AD
Int J Sports Med; 2017 Nov; 38(12):897-901. PubMed ID: 28934805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Defining the number of bouts and oxygen uptake during the "Tabata protocol" performed at different intensities.
Viana RB; Naves JPA; de Lira CAB; Coswig VS; Del Vecchio FB; Vieira CA; Gentil P
Physiol Behav; 2018 May; 189():10-15. PubMed ID: 29486169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
