These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38810155)
1. Discussion: Complications following Breast Augmentation in Transfeminine Individuals: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Alba B; Nolan IT; Weinstein B; Schechter L Plast Reconstr Surg; 2024 Jun; 153(6):1252-1253. PubMed ID: 38810155 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Complications following Breast Augmentation in Transfeminine Individuals: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Liu C; Shahid M; Yu Q; Orra S; Ranganath B; Chao JW Plast Reconstr Surg; 2024 Jun; 153(6):1240-1251. PubMed ID: 37189242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Augmentation Mastopexy:: Planning and Performance for Predictability: Management of Complications. Layt CWL Clin Plast Surg; 2021 Jan; 48(1):45-57. PubMed ID: 33220904 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Incidence of complications following two-stage expander/implant breast reconstruction: The impact of cancer diagnosis in prophylactic mastectomy. Simpson AM; Moores N; Swistun L; Ying J; Agarwal JP Breast J; 2019 Jul; 25(4):757-759. PubMed ID: 31077489 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Commentary on: Complications of Aesthetic and Reconstructive Breast Implant Capsulectomy: An Analysis of 7486 Patients Using Nationwide Outcomes Data. McGuire P Aesthet Surg J; 2024 Aug; 44(9):946-947. PubMed ID: 38626264 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Postoperative Complications Following Prepectoral Versus Partial Subpectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Using ADM: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Fusario D; Casella D Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2024 Jan; 48(1):13-14. PubMed ID: 37193889 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Invited Response on: Postoperative Complications Following Prepectoral Versus Partial Subpectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Using ADM: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Zhu L; Liu C Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2024 Jan; 48(1):15-16. PubMed ID: 37253845 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Factors Associated With Complications in Immediate Breast Reconstruction in 1 Stage With Completely Submuscular Implants. Yazar S; Altinkaya A; Bengur FB; Karadag EC; Kara H; Uras C Ann Plast Surg; 2019 Sep; 83(3):264-270. PubMed ID: 30694848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Outcomes in Subfascial Versus Subglandular Planes in Breast Augmentation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Yuan M; Kim P; Gallo L; Austin RE; Lista F; Ahmad J Aesthet Surg J; 2024 Aug; 44(9):NP639-NP644. PubMed ID: 38825810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Enhancing skin preparation to mitigate Cutibacterium acnes infections in breast augmentation and reconstruction. Barber A; McMains C; LoGiudice JA J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2024 Jun; 93():279-280. PubMed ID: 38728900 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Breast Cancer after Augmentation: Oncologic and Reconstructive Considerations among Women Undergoing Mastectomy. Cho EH; Shammas RL; Phillips BT; Greenup RA; Hwang ES; Hollenbeck ST Plast Reconstr Surg; 2017 Jun; 139(6):1240e-1249e. PubMed ID: 28538550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A guide to breast implants for the non-breast specialist. Harvey KL; Clark SE Womens Health (Lond); 2016 Nov; 12(6):533-537. PubMed ID: 29334026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Nipple-areola complex sensitivity after primary breast augmentation: a comparison of periareolar and inframammary incision approaches. Mofid MM; Klatsky SA; Singh NK; Nahabedian MY Plast Reconstr Surg; 2006 May; 117(6):1694-8. PubMed ID: 16651938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Breast Augmentation in the Transfemale Patient: Comprehensive Principles for Planning and Obtaining Ideal Results. Coon D; Lee E; Fischer B; Darrach H; Landford WN Plast Reconstr Surg; 2020 Jun; 145(6):1343-1353. PubMed ID: 32459763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Complications Following Subpectoral Versus Prepectoral Breast Augmentation: A Meta-analysis. Li S; Mu D; Liu C; Xin M; Fu S; Xu B; Li Z; Qi J; Luan J Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2019 Aug; 43(4):890-898. PubMed ID: 31139912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Discussion: Revision Incidence after Immediate Direct-to-Implant versus Two-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Using National Real-World Data. Haddock NT; Teotia SS Plast Reconstr Surg; 2023 Apr; 151(4):703-704. PubMed ID: 36989338 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Magnetic resonance tomography in the diagnostics of breast implants: a survey]. Hauth EA; Hoffmann O; Zadow-Eulerich T; Kimmig R; Forsting M Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch; 2008; 48(2):76-83. PubMed ID: 18431047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Breast augmentation. Pelosi MA; Pelosi MA Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2010 Dec; 37(4):533-46, viii. PubMed ID: 21093748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The association between rare complications and the use of acellular dermal matrix in patients undergoing implant-based breast reconstruction. Falk MW; Kullab RB; Lau A; Weltz TK; Hemmingsen MN; Larsen A; Ørholt M; Vester-Glowinski PV; Herly M J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2024 Mar; 90():101-102. PubMed ID: 38364666 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]