These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38810543)

  • 1. Biomechanical considerations of semi-anatomic glass fiber-reinforced (GFRC) composite implant for mandibular segmental defects: A technical note.
    Väisänen A; Hoikkala N; Härkönen V; Moritz N; Vallittu PK
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2024 Aug; 156():106604. PubMed ID: 38810543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Patient specific glass fiber reinforced composite versus titanium plate: A comparative biomechanical analysis under cyclic dynamic loading.
    Rendenbach C; Steffen C; Sellenschloh K; Heyland M; Morlock MM; Toivonen J; Moritz N; Smeets R; Heiland M; Vallittu PK; Huber G
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2019 Mar; 91():212-219. PubMed ID: 30594831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biomechanical evaluation of a new MatrixMandible plating system on cadaver mandibles.
    Gateno J; Cookston C; Hsu SS; Stal DN; Durrani SK; Gold J; Ismaily S; Alexander JW; Noble PC; Xia JJ
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Nov; 71(11):1900-14. PubMed ID: 24012175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biomechanical testing of different osteosynthesis systems for segmental resection of the mandible.
    Schupp W; Arzdorf M; Linke B; Gutwald R
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 May; 65(5):924-30. PubMed ID: 17448842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Experimental validation of finite element simulation of a new custom-designed fixation plate to treat mandibular angle fracture.
    Xu X; Cheng KJ; Liu YF; Fan YY; Wang JH; Wang R; Baur DA; Jiang XF; Dong XT
    Biomed Eng Online; 2021 Feb; 20(1):15. PubMed ID: 33546713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Adaquate fixation of plates for stability during mandibular reconstruction.
    Kimura A; Nagasao T; Kaneko T; Tamaki T; Miyamoto J; Nakajima T
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2006 Jun; 34(4):193-200. PubMed ID: 16624567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Finite element analysis of biplanar customized reconstruction plates for lateral and central segmental defects of mandible.
    Demir E; Yalçın G; Kalaycı A
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2024; 27(4):489-497. PubMed ID: 36920278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative finite element analysis of the biomechanical stability of 2.0 fixation plates in atrophic mandibular fractures.
    Vajgel A; Camargo IB; Willmersdorf RB; de Melo TM; Laureano Filho JR; Vasconcellos RJ
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Feb; 71(2):335-42. PubMed ID: 23351762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An in vitro evaluation of rigid internal fixation techniques for sagittal split ramus osteotomies: setback surgery.
    Brasileiro BF; Grotta-Grempel R; Ambrosano GM; Passeri LA
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Apr; 70(4):941-51. PubMed ID: 21752510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An in vitro evaluation of rigid internal fixation techniques for sagittal split ramus osteotomies: advancement surgery.
    Brasileiro BF; Grempel RG; Ambrosano GM; Passeri LA
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Apr; 67(4):809-17. PubMed ID: 19304039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A biomechanical evaluation of plating techniques used for reconstructing mandibular symphysis/parasymphysis fractures.
    Madsen MJ; McDaniel CA; Haug RH
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Oct; 66(10):2012-9. PubMed ID: 18848096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biomechanical effects of screw fixation in second mandibular reconstruction plate.
    Chang YW; Liu PH
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():3167-70. PubMed ID: 24110400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A biomechanical evaluation of bilateral sagittal ramus osteotomy fixation techniques.
    Peterson GP; Haug RH; Van Sickels J
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Sep; 63(9):1317-24. PubMed ID: 16122596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A customized fixation plate with novel structure designed by topological optimization for mandibular angle fracture based on finite element analysis.
    Liu YF; Fan YY; Jiang XF; Baur DA
    Biomed Eng Online; 2017 Nov; 16(1):131. PubMed ID: 29141673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of stresses in implantation for grafted and plate-and-screw mandible reconstruction.
    Nagasao T; Miyamoto J; Tamaki T; Kawana H
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Mar; 109(3):346-56. PubMed ID: 20097102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The biomechanical aspects of reconstruction for segmental defects of the mandible: a finite element study to assess the optimisation of plate and screw factors.
    Bujtár P; Simonovics J; Váradi K; Sándor GK; Avery CM
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 42(6):855-62. PubMed ID: 24467871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Internal fixation of radial shaft fractures: Anatomical and biomechanical principles].
    Bartoníček J; Naňka O; Tuček M
    Rozhl Chir; 2015 Oct; 94(10):425-36. PubMed ID: 26556020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biomechanical analysis of titanium fixation plates and screws in mandibular angle fractures.
    Atik F; Atac MS; Özkan A; Kilinc Y; Arslan M
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2016; 19(3):386-90. PubMed ID: 27022805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Does plate adaptation affect stability? A biomechanical comparison of locking and nonlocking plates.
    Haug RH; Street CC; Goltz M
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2002 Nov; 60(11):1319-26. PubMed ID: 12420268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An in vitro comparison of an adjustable bone fixation system.
    Van Sickels JE; Peterson GP; Holms S; Haug RH
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Nov; 63(11):1620-5. PubMed ID: 16243179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.