115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3881065)
1. Mammography, sonomammography, and diaphanography (lightscanning). A prospective, comparative study with histologic correlation.
Greene FL; Hicks C; Eddy V; Davis C
Am Surg; 1985 Jan; 51(1):58-60. PubMed ID: 3881065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The challenge of imaging dense breast parenchyma: is magnetic resonance mammography the technique of choice? A comparative study with x-ray mammography and whole-breast ultrasound.
Pediconi F; Catalano C; Roselli A; Dominelli V; Cagioli S; Karatasiou A; Pronio A; Kirchin MA; Passariello R
Invest Radiol; 2009 Jul; 44(7):412-21. PubMed ID: 19448554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diaphanoscopy and diaphanography for breast cancer detection in clinical practice.
Angquist KA; Holmlund D; Liliequist B; Lindqvist M; Salemark L
Acta Chir Scand; 1981; 147(4):231-8. PubMed ID: 7324750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic accuracy of lightscanning and mammography in women with dense breasts.
Jarlman O; Andersson I; Balldin G; Larsson SA
Acta Radiol; 1992 Jan; 33(1):69-71. PubMed ID: 1731847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Needle aspiration cytology of the breast: current perspective on the role in diagnosis and management].
Kocjan G
Acta Med Croatica; 2008 Oct; 62(4):391-401. PubMed ID: 19205416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diaphanography in the diagnosis of breast cancer.
Drexler B; Davis JL; Schofield G
Radiology; 1985 Oct; 157(1):41-4. PubMed ID: 4034975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Breast fine needle aspiration cytology. Utility as a screening tool for clinically palpable lesions.
Costa MJ; Tadros T; Hilton G; Birdsong G
Acta Cytol; 1993; 37(4):461-71. PubMed ID: 8328240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Value of high-resolution real-time sonography in breast cancer].
Leucht W; Rabe D; Boos R; Humbert KD; von Fournier D; Schmidt W
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1984 Sep; 44(9):557-62. PubMed ID: 6092202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Minority report - false negative breast assessment in women recalled for suspicious screening mammography: imaging and pathological features, and associated delay in diagnosis.
Ciatto S; Houssami N; Ambrogetti D; Bonardi R; Collini G; Del Turco MR
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Sep; 105(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 17115112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The value of diaphanography as an adjunct to mammography in breast diagnostics.
Wallberg H; Alveryd A; Sundelin P; Troell S
Acta Chir Scand Suppl; 1986; 530():83-7. PubMed ID: 3460295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Screening women at high risk for breast cancer with mammography and magnetic resonance imaging.
Lehman CD; Blume JD; Weatherall P; Thickman D; Hylton N; Warner E; Pisano E; Schnitt SJ; Gatsonis C; Schnall M; DeAngelis GA; Stomper P; Rosen EL; O'Loughlin M; Harms S; Bluemke DA;
Cancer; 2005 May; 103(9):1898-905. PubMed ID: 15800894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Improvement of preoperative evaluation of palpable, noncystic processes of the breast by echomammography].
Leucht W; Rabe D; Müller A; von Fournier D; Humbert KD; Schmidt W
Ultraschall Med; 1985 Feb; 6(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 3887563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mammography of symptomatic breasts. A report on 1119 consecutive patients.
Standertskjöld-Nordenstam CG; Svinhufvud U
Ann Chir Gynaecol; 1980; 69(2):48-53. PubMed ID: 7377735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Relation between lightscanning and the histologic and mammographic appearance of malignant breast tumors.
Jarlman O; Balldin G; Andersson I; Löfgren M; Larsson AS; Linell F
Acta Radiol; 1992 Jan; 33(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 1731846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diaphanography in breast carcinoma. Correlation with clinical examination, mammography, cytology and histology.
Wallberg H; Alveryd A; Bergvall U; Nasiell K; Sundelin P; Troell S
Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1985; 26(1):33-44. PubMed ID: 2983515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Infrared light scanning of the breast.
Lafreniere R; Ashkar FS; Ketcham AS
Am Surg; 1986 Mar; 52(3):123-8. PubMed ID: 3954258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Papillary lesions of the breast: diagnostic imaging and contribution of percutaneous needle biopsy with 14G needle].
Bazzocchi M; Berra I; Francescutti GE; Del Frate C; Zuiani C; Puglisi F; Di Loreto C
Radiol Med; 2001 Jun; 101(6):424-31. PubMed ID: 11479438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Comparison of mammography and automated sonography in 700 patients].
Kessler M; Igl W; Krauss B; Bassermann R; Bohmert DH; Eiermann W; Lohe KJ; Lissner J
Rofo; 1983 Mar; 138(3):331-9. PubMed ID: 6403428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Detection of breast carcinoma: comparison of automated water-path whole-breast sonography, mammography, and physical examination.
Egan RL; Egan KL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1984 Sep; 143(3):493-7. PubMed ID: 6331727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Automated water-path full-breast sonography: correlation with histology of 176 solid lesions.
Egan RL; Egan KL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1984 Sep; 143(3):499-507. PubMed ID: 6087645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
