These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38811193)

  • 1. [A Study on the Uncertainty of the Average Glandular Dose in Quality Control of Mammographic X-ray Units].
    Takizawa T; Sekimoto M; Kodama N
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2024 Jul; 80(7):721-730. PubMed ID: 38811193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Uncertainties of exposure-related quantities in mammographic x-ray unit quality control.
    Gregory KJ; Pattison JE; Bibbo G
    Med Phys; 2006 Mar; 33(3):687-98. PubMed ID: 16878572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Patient investigation of average glandular dose and incident air kerma for digital mammography.
    Kawaguchi A; Matsunaga Y; Otsuka T; Suzuki S
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2014 Jan; 7(1):102-8. PubMed ID: 24234736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance of semiconductor dosimeters with a range of radiation qualities used for mammography: A calibration laboratory study.
    Salomon E; Homolka P; Csete I; Toroi P
    Med Phys; 2020 Mar; 47(3):1372-1378. PubMed ID: 31889315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Average glandular dose in paired digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis acquisitions in a population based screening program: effects of measuring breast density, air kerma and beam quality.
    Østerås BH; Skaane P; Gullien R; Martinsen ACT
    Phys Med Biol; 2018 Jan; 63(3):035006. PubMed ID: 29311416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The measurement of entrance surface dose using optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters for determining average glandular dose in digital breast tomosynthesis: Measurement and simulation study.
    Chusin T; Yabsantia S; Matsubara K
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2022 Jan; 23(1):e13485. PubMed ID: 35041264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Measurement of Average Glandular Dose Using Multiparameter X-ray Measuring Instrument].
    Kobayashi T; Koyama T; Terada M; Negishi T
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2023 Nov; 79(11):1266-1273. PubMed ID: 37778978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Solid-state dosimeters: a new approach for mammography measurements.
    Brateman LF; Heintz PH
    Med Phys; 2015 Feb; 42(2):542-57. PubMed ID: 25652475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative study of dose values and image quality in mammography in the area of Madrid.
    Morán P; Chevalier M; Vanó E
    Br J Radiol; 1994 Jun; 67(798):556-63. PubMed ID: 8032809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimated Average Glandular Dose for 1,828 Mammography Procedures in China: A Multicenter Study.
    DU X; Wang J; Zhu BL
    Biomed Environ Sci; 2019 Apr; 32(4):242-249. PubMed ID: 31217060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quality control programme in mammography: second level quality controls.
    Nassivera E; Nardin L
    Br J Radiol; 1997 Jun; 70(834):612-8. PubMed ID: 9227255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Determination of average glandular dose with modern mammography units for two large groups of patients.
    Klein R; Aichinger H; Dierker J; Jansen JT; Joite-Barfuss S; Säbel M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Zoetelief J
    Phys Med Biol; 1997 Apr; 42(4):651-71. PubMed ID: 9127443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Monte Carlo generated conversion factors for the estimation of average glandular dose in contact and magnification mammography.
    Koutalonis M; Delis H; Spyrou G; Costaridou L; Tzanakos G; Panayiotakis G
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov; 51(21):5539-48. PubMed ID: 17047268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Radiation doses in volume-of-interest breast computed tomography--A Monte Carlo simulation study.
    Lai CJ; Zhong Y; Yi Y; Wang T; Shaw CC
    Med Phys; 2015 Jun; 42(6):3063-75. PubMed ID: 26127058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Internal breast dosimetry in mammography: Experimental methods and Monte Carlo validation with a monoenergetic x-ray beam.
    Fedon C; Caballo M; Longo R; Trianni A; Sechopoulos I
    Med Phys; 2018 Apr; 45(4):1724-1737. PubMed ID: 29405311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Evaluation of the Accuracy of the Displayed Average Glandular Dose in Mammography].
    Kitano M; Tokorodani R; Yamada Y; Muto H
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2022 Nov; 78(11):1333-1340. PubMed ID: 36104224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dose assessment in contrast enhanced digital mammography using simple phantoms simulating standard model breasts.
    Bouwman RW; van Engen RE; Young KC; Veldkamp WJ; Dance DR
    Phys Med Biol; 2015 Jan; 60(1):N1-7. PubMed ID: 25500435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of a compression paddle on energy response, calibration and measurement with mammographic dosimeters using ionization chambers and solid-state detectors.
    Hourdakis CJ; Boziari A; Koumbouli E
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Feb; 54(4):1047-59. PubMed ID: 19168939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of the measurement conditions and compression paddle on mammography dosimeter response.
    Costa de Castro M; Toroi P; Kortesniemi M; Lindholm C; Pinto M; Rinaldi L; Tietäväinen A; Tikkanen J; Živanović M
    Phys Med; 2024 Jul; 123():103405. PubMed ID: 38870645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Breast dosimetry.
    Dance DR; Skinner CL; Carlsson GA
    Appl Radiat Isot; 1999 Jan; 50(1):185-203. PubMed ID: 10028637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.