These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38811346)

  • 1. A survey on mean glandular dose in mammography examination and the factors affecting it in Shahid Sadoughi Hospital, Yazd, Iran.
    Asadollahzadeh N; Razavi S; Zare MH
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2024 Jun; 200(9):809-821. PubMed ID: 38811346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Towards proposition of a diagnostic reference level for mammographic examination in the greater Khorasan Province, Iran.
    Bahreyni Toossi MT; Zare H; Bayani Roodi Sh; Hashemi M; Akbari F; Malekzadeh M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Jun; 155(1):96-9. PubMed ID: 23209184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A study of mean glandular dose during diagnostic mammography in Malaysia and some of the factors affecting it.
    Jamal N; Ng KH; McLean D
    Br J Radiol; 2003 Apr; 76(904):238-45. PubMed ID: 12711643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Regression Analysis between the Different Breast Dose Quantities Reported in Digital Mammography and Patient Age, Breast Thickness, and Acquisition Parameters.
    Dhou S; Dalah E; AlGhafeer R; Hamidu A; Obaideen A
    J Imaging; 2022 Jul; 8(8):. PubMed ID: 36005454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. INSTITUTIONAL BREAST DOSES IN DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY.
    Lekatou A; Metaxas V; Messaris G; Antzele P; Tzavellas G; Panayiotakis G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Dec; 185(2):239-251. PubMed ID: 30753684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mean glandular dose in digital mamography in women with breast implants.
    Couto LS; Freitas-Junior R; Correa RS; Peixoto JE; Almeida CD; Rodrigues DCN; Glassman LM; Soares LR
    J Radiol Prot; 2019 Apr; 39(2):498-510. PubMed ID: 30812019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of mean glandular dose in a full-field digital mammography unit in Tabriz, Iran.
    Alizadeh Riabi H; Mehnati P; Mesbahi A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Dec; 142(2-4):222-7. PubMed ID: 20823039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Investigation of breast dose in five screening mammography centres in Greece.
    Tsapaki V; Tsalafoutas IA; Poga V; Louizi A; Kottou S; Koulentianos E
    J Radiol Prot; 2008 Sep; 28(3):337-46. PubMed ID: 18714130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dose management software implementation in mammography.
    Samara ET; Tsapaki V; Sramek D
    Phys Med; 2019 Dec; 68():88-95. PubMed ID: 31765886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Investigation of mean glandular dose in diagnostic mammography in China.
    Du X; Wang J; Yang CY; Zhou XF; Chen W; Cao XJ; Zhou YY; Le Yu N
    Biomed Environ Sci; 2014 May; 27(5):396-9. PubMed ID: 24827723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mammography radiation dose: initial results from Serbia based on mean glandular dose assessment for phantoms and patients.
    Ciraj-Bjelac O; Beciric S; Arandjic D; Kosutic D; Kovacevic M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Jun; 140(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 20159918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Proposed DRLs for mammography in Switzerland.
    Dupont L; Aberle C; Botsikas D; Ith M; Lima TVM; Menz R; Monnin P; Poletti PA; Presilla S; Schegerer A; Stoica LC; Trueb P; Sans Merce M
    J Radiol Prot; 2024 May; 44(2):. PubMed ID: 38530290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Average glandular dose in digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis.
    Olgar T; Kahn T; Gosch D
    Rofo; 2012 Oct; 184(10):911-8. PubMed ID: 22711250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Establishment of regional diagnostic reference levels for digital mammography in Western Province of Sri Lanka.
    Niroshani HS; Jeyasugiththan J; Senanayake G; Negishi T
    J Radiol Prot; 2021 Feb; 41(1):. PubMed ID: 33271512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Local diagnostic reference levels for digital mammography: Two hospitals study in northwest, Nigeria.
    Garba I; Bashir HS; Bello F; Nuhu KS; Mohammed S; Mansur Y; Lawal Y
    J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2021 Sep; 52(3):435-442. PubMed ID: 33896746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of the uterine dose in digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Cepeda Martins AR; Di Maria S; Afonso J; Pereira M; Pereira J; Vaz P
    Radiography (Lond); 2022 May; 28(2):333-339. PubMed ID: 34565679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The relationship between mean glandular dose and compressed breast thickness specified for Jordan.
    Ahmed Shaker Hegian Z; Moh'd Abu Tahoun L; Ramli RM; Noor Azman NZ
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2023 Dec; 200(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 37738470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Radiation doses in the United Kingdom breast screening programmes 2016-2019.
    Loveland J; Young KC; Oduko JM; Mackenzie A
    Br J Radiol; 2022 Jul; 95(1135):20211400. PubMed ID: 35604717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Glandular doses and diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) for Saudi breast cancer screening programme (2012-2021).
    Albeshan SM; Alhulail AA; Almuqbil MM
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2024 Apr; 200(5):467-472. PubMed ID: 38324508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Radiation dose to breast during digital mammography in Tanzania.
    Edmund E; Kamuzora M; Muhogora W; Ngoya P; Muhulo A; Amirali A; Makoba A; Ngoye W; Ngaile J; Majatta S; Ngulimi M; Mwambinga S; Kaijage T
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2024 Mar; 200(4):409-416. PubMed ID: 38196028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.