These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38811515)
1. Contrast-enhanced mammography in the management of breast architectural distortions and avoidance of unnecessary biopsies. Bellini C; Pugliese F; Bicchierai G; Amato F; De Benedetto D; Di Naro F; Boeri C; Vanzi E; Migliaro G; Incardona L; Tommasi C; Orzalesi L; Miele V; Nori J Breast Cancer; 2024 Sep; 31(5):851-857. PubMed ID: 38811515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Value of contrast-enhanced mammography combined with the Kaiser score for clinical decision-making regarding tomosynthesis BI-RADS 4A lesions. Rong X; Kang Y; Xue J; Han P; Li Z; Yang G; Shi G Eur Radiol; 2022 Nov; 32(11):7439-7447. PubMed ID: 35639141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Role of contrast-enhanced mammogram as an adjunct to tomosynthesis in evaluation of circumscribed breast lesions. Porkodi D; Devimeenal J Br J Radiol; 2024 Oct; 97(1162):1696-1705. PubMed ID: 39024041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical utility of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography as an adjunct for tomosynthesis-detected architectural distortion. Patel BK; Naylor ME; Kosiorek HE; Lopez-Alvarez YM; Miller AM; Pizzitola VJ; Pockaj BA Clin Imaging; 2017; 46():44-52. PubMed ID: 28723585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Tomosynthesis-Guided Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy of Architectural Distortion Without a Sonographic Correlate: A Retrospective Review. Ambinder EB; Plotkin A; Euhus D; Mullen LA; Oluyemi E; Di Carlo P; Philip M; Panigrahi B; Cimino-Mathews A; Myers KS AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Oct; 217(4):845-854. PubMed ID: 33147055 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of prone and upright, stereotactic, and tomosynthesis-guided biopsies with secondary analysis of ultrasound-occult architectural distortions. Cohen EO; Korhonen KE; Sun J; Leung JWT Eur Radiol; 2023 Sep; 33(9):6189-6203. PubMed ID: 37042980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dynamic contrast-enhanced mammography and breast MRI in the diagnosis of breast cancer and detection of tumor size. Tekinhatun M; Sabir N; Erdem E; Yilmaz S; Ufuk F Turk J Med Sci; 2024; 54(1):249-261. PubMed ID: 38812642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Digital Mammography Stereotactic Biopsy versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis-guided Biopsy: Differences in Biopsy Targets, Pathologic Results, and Discordance Rates. Rochat CJ; Baird GL; Lourenco AP Radiology; 2020 Mar; 294(3):518-527. PubMed ID: 31961261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Digital tomosynthesis spot view in architectural distortions: outcomes in management and radiation dose. Fiaschetti V; Ubaldi N; De Fazio S; Ricci A; Maspes F; Cossu E Radiol Med; 2023 Jan; 128(1):35-48. PubMed ID: 36534241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Architectural distortion outcome: digital breast tomosynthesis-detected versus digital mammography-detected. Ahmed SA; Samy M; Ali AM; Hassan RA Radiol Med; 2022 Jan; 127(1):30-38. PubMed ID: 34665431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Low-Dose, Contrast-Enhanced Mammography Compared to Contrast-Enhanced Breast MRI: A Feasibility Study. Clauser P; Baltzer PAT; Kapetas P; Hoernig M; Weber M; Leone F; Bernathova M; Helbich TH J Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Aug; 52(2):589-595. PubMed ID: 32061002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pathological outcome of sonographically occult architectural distortions (AD) visible only on digital breast tomosynthesis, and comparison with AD visible also on 2D mammography. Linda A; Tarricone R; Londero V; Girometti R; Zuiani C Eur J Radiol; 2022 Jan; 146():110075. PubMed ID: 34864616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Breast masses with rim enhancement on contrast-enhanced mammography: morphological and enhancement features for diagnosis and differentiation of benign and malignant. Wen C; Wang S; Ma M; Xu Z; Zeng F; Zeng H; Liao X; He Z; Xu W; Chen W Br J Radiol; 2024 May; 97(1157):1016-1021. PubMed ID: 38521539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multireader comparison of contrast-enhanced mammography versus the combination of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis in the preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Girometti R; Linda A; Conte P; Lorenzon M; De Serio I; Jerman K; Londero V; Zuiani C Radiol Med; 2021 Nov; 126(11):1407-1414. PubMed ID: 34302599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Utility of Targeted Ultrasound to Predict Malignancy Among Lesions Detected on Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography. Coffey K; Sung J; Comstock C; Askin G; Jochelson MS; Morris EA; D'Alessio D AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Sep; 217(3):595-604. PubMed ID: 33025811 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Initial Experience of Tomosynthesis-Guided Vacuum-Assisted Biopsies of Tomosynthesis-Detected (2D Mammography and Ultrasound Occult) Architectural Distortions. Patel BK; Covington M; Pizzitola VJ; Lorans R; Giurescu M; Eversman W; Lewin J AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Jun; 210(6):1395-1400. PubMed ID: 29570367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Are contrast enhanced mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis equally effective in diagnosing patients recalled from breast cancer screening? Siminiak N; Pasiuk-Czepczyńska A; Godlewska A; Wojtyś P; Olejnik M; Michalak J; Nowaczyk P; Gajdzis P; Godlewski D; Ruchała M; Czepczyński R Front Oncol; 2022; 12():941312. PubMed ID: 36505843 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Architecture distortion score (ADS) in malignancy risk stratification of architecture distortion on contrast-enhanced digital mammography. Goh Y; Chan CW; Pillay P; Lee HS; Pan HB; Hung BH; Quek ST; Chou CP Eur Radiol; 2021 May; 31(5):2657-2666. PubMed ID: 33125555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Upgraded BIRADS Scoring towards the True Pathology of Lesions Detected by Contrast-Enhanced Mammography. Grubstein A; Friehmann T; Dahan M; Abitbol C; Gadiel I; Schejtman DM; Shochat T; Atar E; Tamir S Tomography; 2024 May; 10(5):806-815. PubMed ID: 38787021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison between second-look ultrasound and second-look digital breast tomosynthesis in the detection of additional lesions with presurgical CESM. Bellini C; Bicchierai G; Amato F; Savi E; De Benedetto D; Di Naro F; Boeri C; Vanzi E; Miele V; Nori J Br J Radiol; 2022 Jun; 95(1134):20210927. PubMed ID: 35451312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]