These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38811515)

  • 21. Detection of mammographically occult architectural distortion on digital breast tomosynthesis screening: initial clinical experience.
    Partyka L; Lourenco AP; Mainiero MB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Jul; 203(1):216-22. PubMed ID: 24951218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Pathologic Outcomes in Single Versus Multiple Areas of Architectural Distortion on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    Wang LC; Philip M; Bhole S; Rao S; Gupta D; Schacht D; Friedewald SM; Anders R
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2023 Jan; 220(1):50-62. PubMed ID: 35895298
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluation of architectural distortion with contrast-enhanced mammography.
    Goh Y; Quek ST; Pillay P; Chou CP
    Clin Radiol; 2024 Mar; 79(3):163-169. PubMed ID: 38114374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis in the detection of architectural distortion.
    Dibble EH; Lourenco AP; Baird GL; Ward RC; Maynard AS; Mainiero MB
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Jan; 28(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 28710582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Contrast-enhanced mammography-guided biopsy: technical feasibility and first outcomes.
    Alcantara R; Posso M; Pitarch M; Arenas N; Ejarque B; Iotti V; Besutti G
    Eur Radiol; 2023 Jan; 33(1):417-428. PubMed ID: 35895121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparative Evaluation of Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Diagnosing and Treating Breast Cancer.
    Yang D; Gong F
    Med Sci Monit; 2023 Dec; 29():e941880. PubMed ID: 38087777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Contrast-enhanced mammography for the assessment of screening recalls: a two-centre study.
    Cozzi A; Schiaffino S; Fanizza M; Magni V; Menicagli L; Monaco CG; Benedek A; Spinelli D; Di Leo G; Di Giulio G; Sardanelli F
    Eur Radiol; 2022 Nov; 32(11):7388-7399. PubMed ID: 35648209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Utility of MRI-Directed Contrast-Enhanced Mammography for Biopsy Planning for Suspicious MRI-Detected Breast Lesions.
    Nida BA; Rooney TB; Miller MM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2023 Feb; 220(2):202-211. PubMed ID: 36000664
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced digital mammography in breast cancer detection in comparison to tomosynthesis, synthetic 2D mammography and tomosynthesis combined with ultrasound in women with dense breast.
    Sudhir R; Sannapareddy K; Potlapalli A; Krishnamurthy PB; Buddha S; Koppula V
    Br J Radiol; 2021 Feb; 94(1118):20201046. PubMed ID: 33242249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Tomosynthesis-Detected Architectural Distortions: Correlations between Imaging Characteristics and Histopathologic Outcomes.
    Romanucci G; Fornasa F; Caneva A; Rossati C; Mandarà M; Tommasini O; Rella R
    J Imaging; 2023 May; 9(5):. PubMed ID: 37233322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Malignant Outcomes of Architectural Distortion on Tomosynthesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Choudhery S; Johnson MP; Larson NB; Anderson T
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Aug; 217(2):295-303. PubMed ID: 32966111
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Outcome of Architectural Distortion Detected Only at Breast Tomosynthesis versus 2D Mammography.
    Alshafeiy TI; Nguyen JV; Rochman CM; Nicholson BT; Patrie JT; Harvey JA
    Radiology; 2018 Jul; 288(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 29584593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Diagnostic accuracy of tomosynthesis-guided vacuum assisted breast biopsy of ultrasound occult lesions.
    Bohan S; Ramli Hamid MT; Chan WY; Vijayananthan A; Ramli N; Kaur S; Rahmat K
    Sci Rep; 2021 Jan; 11(1):129. PubMed ID: 33420200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Improving the Diagnostic Accuracy of Breast BI-RADS 4 Microcalcification-Only Lesions Using Contrast-Enhanced Mammography.
    Long R; Cao K; Cao M; Li XT; Gao F; Zhang FD; Yu YZ; Sun YS
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2021 Jun; 21(3):256-262.e2. PubMed ID: 33243676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Contrast Enhanced Digital Mammography (CEDM) Helps to Safely Reduce Benign Breast Biopsies for Low to Moderately Suspicious Soft Tissue Lesions.
    Zuley ML; Bandos AI; Abrams GS; Ganott MA; Gizienski TA; Hakim CM; Kelly AE; Nair BE; Sumkin JH; Waheed U; Gur D
    Acad Radiol; 2020 Jul; 27(7):969-976. PubMed ID: 31495761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of Upright Digital Breast Tomosynthesis-guided versus Prone Stereotactic Vacuum-assisted Breast Biopsy.
    Bahl M; Maunglay M; D'Alessandro HA; Lehman CD
    Radiology; 2019 Feb; 290(2):298-304. PubMed ID: 30511909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Assessing the malignancy of suspicious breast microcalcifications: the role of contrast enhanced mammography.
    Depretto C; D'Ascoli E; Della Pepa G; Irmici G; De Berardinis C; Ballerini D; Bonanomi A; Ancona E; Ferranti C; Scaperrotta GP
    Radiol Med; 2024 Jun; 129(6):855-863. PubMed ID: 38607514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Digital breast tomosynthesis and contrast-enhanced dual-energy digital mammography alone and in combination compared to 2D digital synthetized mammography and MR imaging in breast cancer detection and classification.
    Petrillo A; Fusco R; Vallone P; Filice S; Granata V; Petrosino T; Rosaria Rubulotta M; Setola SV; Mattace Raso M; Maio F; Raiano C; Siani C; Di Bonito M; Botti G
    Breast J; 2020 May; 26(5):860-872. PubMed ID: 31886607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Impact on the recall rate of digital breast tomosynthesis as an adjunct to digital mammography in the screening setting. A double reading experience and review of the literature.
    Carbonaro LA; Di Leo G; Clauser P; Trimboli RM; Verardi N; Fedeli MP; Girometti R; Tafà A; Bruscoli P; Saguatti G; Bazzocchi M; Sardanelli F
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Apr; 85(4):808-14. PubMed ID: 26971428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Added value of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) in staging of malignant breast lesions-a feasibility study.
    Åhsberg K; Gardfjell A; Nimeus E; Rasmussen R; Behmer C; Zackrisson S; Ryden L
    World J Surg Oncol; 2020 May; 18(1):100. PubMed ID: 32438917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.