BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38811555)

  • 1. A polygenic score method boosted by non-additive models.
    Ohta R; Tanigawa Y; Suzuki Y; Kellis M; Morishita S
    Nat Commun; 2024 May; 15(1):4433. PubMed ID: 38811555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantifying the contribution of dominance deviation effects to complex trait variation in biobank-scale data.
    Pazokitoroudi A; Chiu AM; Burch KS; Pasaniuc B; Sankararaman S
    Am J Hum Genet; 2021 May; 108(5):799-808. PubMed ID: 33811807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Non-additive (dominance) effects of genetic variants associated with refractive error and myopia.
    Pozarickij A; Williams C; Guggenheim JA;
    Mol Genet Genomics; 2020 Jul; 295(4):843-853. PubMed ID: 32227305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Haplotype function score improves biological interpretation and cross-ancestry polygenic prediction of human complex traits.
    Song W; Shi Y; Lin GN
    Elife; 2024 Apr; 12():. PubMed ID: 38639992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fast and accurate Bayesian polygenic risk modeling with variational inference.
    Zabad S; Gravel S; Li Y
    Am J Hum Genet; 2023 May; 110(5):741-761. PubMed ID: 37030289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Making the Most of Clumping and Thresholding for Polygenic Scores.
    Privé F; Vilhjálmsson BJ; Aschard H; Blum MGB
    Am J Hum Genet; 2019 Dec; 105(6):1213-1221. PubMed ID: 31761295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Discovering non-additive heritability using additive GWAS summary statistics.
    Pattillo Smith S; Darnell G; Udwin D; Stamp J; Harpak A; Ramachandran S; Crawford L
    Elife; 2024 Jun; 13():. PubMed ID: 38913556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Variable prediction accuracy of polygenic scores within an ancestry group.
    Mostafavi H; Harpak A; Agarwal I; Conley D; Pritchard JK; Przeworski M
    Elife; 2020 Jan; 9():. PubMed ID: 31999256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Analysis of genetic dominance in the UK Biobank.
    Palmer DS; Zhou W; Abbott L; Wigdor EM; Baya N; Churchhouse C; Seed C; Poterba T; King D; Kanai M; Bloemendal A; Neale BM
    Science; 2023 Mar; 379(6639):1341-1348. PubMed ID: 36996212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genetic prediction of complex traits with polygenic scores: a statistical review.
    Ma Y; Zhou X
    Trends Genet; 2021 Nov; 37(11):995-1011. PubMed ID: 34243982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Statistical learning for sparser fine-mapped polygenic models: The prediction of LDL-cholesterol.
    Maj C; Staerk C; Borisov O; Klinkhammer H; Wai Yeung M; Krawitz P; Mayr A
    Genet Epidemiol; 2022 Dec; 46(8):589-603. PubMed ID: 35938382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Efficient Implementation of Penalized Regression for Genetic Risk Prediction.
    Privé F; Aschard H; Blum MGB
    Genetics; 2019 May; 212(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 30808621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On polygenic risk scores for complex traits prediction.
    Zhao B; Zou F
    Biometrics; 2022 Jun; 78(2):499-511. PubMed ID: 33786811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Genome-wide association study in 404,302 individuals identifies 7 significant loci for reaction time variability.
    Wootton O; Shadrin AA; Mohn C; Susser E; Ramesar R; Gur RC; Andreassen OA; Stein DJ; Dalvie S
    Mol Psychiatry; 2023 Sep; 28(9):4011-4019. PubMed ID: 37864076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Controlling for background genetic effects using polygenic scores improves the power of genome-wide association studies.
    Bennett D; O'Shea D; Ferguson J; Morris D; Seoighe C
    Sci Rep; 2021 Oct; 11(1):19571. PubMed ID: 34599249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimation of non-additive genetic variance in human complex traits from a large sample of unrelated individuals.
    Hivert V; Sidorenko J; Rohart F; Goddard ME; Yang J; Wray NR; Yengo L; Visscher PM
    Am J Hum Genet; 2021 May; 108(5):786-798. PubMed ID: 33811805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Genetic determinants of polygenic prediction accuracy within a population.
    Lu T; Forgetta V; Richards JB; Greenwood CMT
    Genetics; 2022 Nov; 222(4):. PubMed ID: 36250789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Non-parametric Polygenic Risk Prediction via Partitioned GWAS Summary Statistics.
    Chun S; Imakaev M; Hui D; Patsopoulos NA; Neale BM; Kathiresan S; Stitziel NO; Sunyaev SR
    Am J Hum Genet; 2020 Jul; 107(1):46-59. PubMed ID: 32470373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Correlation-based tests for the formal comparison of polygenic scores in multiple populations.
    Gunn S; Lunetta KL
    PLoS Genet; 2024 Apr; 20(4):e1011249. PubMed ID: 38669290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Winner's Curse Correction and Variable Thresholding Improve Performance of Polygenic Risk Modeling Based on Genome-Wide Association Study Summary-Level Data.
    Shi J; Park JH; Duan J; Berndt ST; Moy W; Yu K; Song L; Wheeler W; Hua X; Silverman D; Garcia-Closas M; Hsiung CA; Figueroa JD; Cortessis VK; Malats N; Karagas MR; Vineis P; Chang IS; Lin D; Zhou B; Seow A; Matsuo K; Hong YC; Caporaso NE; Wolpin B; Jacobs E; Petersen GM; Klein AP; Li D; Risch H; Sanders AR; Hsu L; Schoen RE; Brenner H; ; ; ; ; ; ; Stolzenberg-Solomon R; Gejman P; Lan Q; Rothman N; Amundadottir LT; Landi MT; Levinson DF; Chanock SJ; Chatterjee N
    PLoS Genet; 2016 Dec; 12(12):e1006493. PubMed ID: 28036406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.