These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38811771)
1. A novel approach to craniofacial analysis using automated 3D landmarking of the skull. Wilke F; Matthews H; Herrick N; Dopkins N; Claes P; Walsh S Sci Rep; 2024 May; 14(1):12381. PubMed ID: 38811771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Automated 3D Landmarking of the Skull: A Novel Approach for Craniofacial Analysis. Wilke F; Matthews H; Herrick N; Dopkins N; Claes P; Walsh S bioRxiv; 2024 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 38405968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Automatic 3D dense phenotyping provides reliable and accurate shape quantification of the human mandible. Verhelst PJ; Matthews H; Verstraete L; Van der Cruyssen F; Mulier D; Croonenborghs TM; Da Costa O; Smeets M; Fieuws S; Shaheen E; Jacobs R; Claes P; Politis C; Peeters H Sci Rep; 2021 Apr; 11(1):8532. PubMed ID: 33879838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Study on the method of automatically determining maxillary complex landmarks based on non-rigid registration algorithms]. Gao ZX; Wang J; Wen AN; Zhu YJ; Qin QZ; Wang Y; Zhao YJ Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2023 Jun; 58(6):554-560. PubMed ID: 37272000 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A knowledge-based algorithm for automatic detection of cephalometric landmarks on CBCT images. Gupta A; Kharbanda OP; Sardana V; Balachandran R; Sardana HK Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2015 Nov; 10(11):1737-52. PubMed ID: 25847662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of automated landmark identification on morphometric analyses. Percival CJ; Devine J; Darwin BC; Liu W; van Eede M; Henkelman RM; Hallgrimsson B J Anat; 2019 Jun; 234(6):917-935. PubMed ID: 30901082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Automatic landmarking as a convenient prerequisite for geometric morphometrics. Validation on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)- based shape analysis of the nasal complex. Ridel AF; Demeter F; Galland M; L'abbé EN; Vandermeulen D; Oettlé AC Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Jan; 306():110095. PubMed ID: 31841934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Linear accuracy and reliability of cone beam CT derived 3-dimensional images constructed using an orthodontic volumetric rendering program. Periago DR; Scarfe WC; Moshiri M; Scheetz JP; Silveira AM; Farman AG Angle Orthod; 2008 May; 78(3):387-95. PubMed ID: 18416632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Development and Validation of Novel Three-Dimensional Craniofacial Landmarks on Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Scans. Liberton DK; Verma P; Contratto A; Lee JS J Craniofac Surg; 2019 Oct; 30(7):e611-e615. PubMed ID: 31478954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Accuracy and reliability of three-dimensional craniofacial cone-beam CT superimposition method based on voxel registration]. Zhou GH; Chen L; Sun YY; Ge N; Su L; Bai YX Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Aug; 51(8):475-9. PubMed ID: 27511038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reproducibility of three-dimensional cephalometric landmarks in cone-beam and low-dose computed tomography. Olszewski R; Frison L; Wisniewski M; Denis JM; Vynckier S; Cosnard G; Zech F; Reychler H Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Jan; 17(1):285-92. PubMed ID: 22350037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Automatic landmark annotation in 3D surface scans of skulls: Methodological proposal and reliability study. Bermejo E; Taniguchi K; Ogawa Y; Martos R; Valsecchi A; Mesejo P; Ibáñez O; Imaizumi K Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2021 Oct; 210():106380. PubMed ID: 34478914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reliability and accuracy of cone beam computed tomography versus conventional multidetector computed tomography for image-guided craniofacial implant planning: An in vitro study. Dings JP; Verhamme L; Merkx MA; Xi T; Meijer GJ; Maal TJ Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(3):665–672. PubMed ID: 30934042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of cephalometric landmark identification on CBCT multiplanar and 3D reconstructions. Neiva MB; Soares ÁC; Lisboa Cde O; Vilella Ode V; Motta AT Angle Orthod; 2015 Jan; 85(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 24713068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Nose approximation among South African groups from cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) using a new computer-assisted method based on automatic landmarking. Ridel AF; Demeter F; L'abbé EN; Vandermeulen D; Oettlé AC Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Aug; 313():110357. PubMed ID: 32603884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy and reliability of landmark-based, surface-based and voxel-based 3D cone-beam computed tomography superimposition methods. Ghoneima A; Cho H; Farouk K; Kula K Orthod Craniofac Res; 2017 Nov; 20(4):227-236. PubMed ID: 28960842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The accuracy of a designed software for automated localization of craniofacial landmarks on CBCT images. Shahidi S; Bahrampour E; Soltanimehr E; Zamani A; Oshagh M; Moattari M; Mehdizadeh A BMC Med Imaging; 2014 Sep; 14():32. PubMed ID: 25223399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The reliability of cephalometric measurements in oral and maxillofacial imaging: Cone beam computed tomography versus two-dimensional digital cephalograms. Hariharan A; Diwakar NR; Jayanthi K; Hema HM; Deepukrishna S; Ghaste SR Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(4):370-377. PubMed ID: 27723632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]