These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 388123)

  • 1. A new parameter in brain stem evoked response: component wave areas.
    Anthony PF; Durrett R; Pulec JL; Hartstone JL
    Laryngoscope; 1979 Oct; 89(10 Pt 1):1569-78. PubMed ID: 388123
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. High-pass and notch noise masking in suprathreshold brainstem response audiometry.
    Laukli E
    Scand Audiol; 1983; 12(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 6612212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Derived brain stem responses by means of pure-tone masking.
    Pantev C; Pantev M
    Scand Audiol; 1982; 11(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 7178798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [The indication for brain stem evoked response and the effect of click rate and stimulus intensity on the latencies of the auditory evoked potentials (author's transl)].
    Baschek V; Steinert W
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1980 Oct; 59(10):690-7. PubMed ID: 7453423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Brainstem responses to tone pip and click stimuli.
    Bauch CD; Rose DE; Harner SG
    Ear Hear; 1980; 1(4):181-4. PubMed ID: 7409354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Brain stem potentials and the auditory threshold].
    Novák M; Janisch R
    Cesk Otolaryngol; 1982 Jan; 31(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 7067008
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The choice of stimulus in the auditory brainstem response test for neurological and audiological examinations.
    Suzuki J; Yamane H
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1982; 388():731-6. PubMed ID: 6953910
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of change of stimulus frequency on the prediction of audiograms.
    Jerger J; Hayes D
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1982; 388():729-30. PubMed ID: 6953909
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Derived acoustically evoked brainstem responses by means of narrow-band and notched-noise masking in normal-hearing subjects.
    Thümmler I; Tietze G
    Scand Audiol; 1984; 13(2):129-37. PubMed ID: 6463552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dipole localization methods (DLM) and auditory evoked brainstem potentials.
    Grandori F
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1984; 105(2 Suppl):171-8. PubMed ID: 6463439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Frequency-specific auditory brainstem responses to clicks masked by notched noise.
    van Zanten GA; Brocaar MP
    Audiology; 1984; 23(3):253-64. PubMed ID: 6732630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Normative data in clinical ABR.
    Bergholtz L
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1981; 13():75-81. PubMed ID: 6944782
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Clicks by bone conduction versus bone-conducted masking for evaluations of brain stem auditory evoked potentials in pediatric patients].
    Ysunza A
    Bol Med Hosp Infant Mex; 1985 Feb; 42(2):99-106. PubMed ID: 3986037
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The frequency specificity of tone-pip evoked auditory brain stem responses.
    Kileny P
    Ear Hear; 1981; 2(6):270-5. PubMed ID: 7308602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The current status of auditory brainstem response testing in neonatal populations.
    Cox LC
    Pediatr Res; 1984 Aug; 18(8):780-3. PubMed ID: 6472950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Technical aspects of brainstem evoked potential audiometry using tones.
    Stapells DR; Picton TW
    Ear Hear; 1981; 2(1):20-9. PubMed ID: 7239023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The inadequacy of click-evoked auditory brainstem responses in audiological applications.
    Eggermont JJ
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1982; 388():707-9. PubMed ID: 6953905
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pitfalls in auditory brain stem response audiometry.
    Weber BA
    Ear Hear; 1983; 4(4):179-84. PubMed ID: 6618036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Rapid derived auditory evoked potentials].
    Conraux C; Dauman R; Feblot P
    Audiology; 1981; 20(5):382-93. PubMed ID: 7271591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Will contralateral white noise interfere with the monaurally click-evoked brainstem response?
    Rosenhamer H; Holmkvist C
    Scand Audiol; 1983; 12(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 6844866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.