These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3881333)

  • 1. PRO objectives and quality criteria.
    Grimaldi PL; Micheletti JA
    Hospitals; 1985 Feb; 59(3):64-7. PubMed ID: 3881333
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The PRO utilization and quality review process: an overview--Part I.
    Politser P
    Bull Am Coll Surg; 1989 May; 74(5):17-22. PubMed ID: 10303472
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Utilization review in the United States: results from a 1976-1977 national survey of hospitals.
    Gertman PM; Monheit AC; Anderson JJ; Eagle JB; Levenson DK
    Med Care; 1979 Aug; 17(8 Suppl):i-iii, 1-148. PubMed ID: 381795
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. AHQA report highlights shifting role of PROs.
    Hosp Peer Rev; 2000 Dec; 25(12):170-2, 158. PubMed ID: 11188112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A patient care review model to suit both hospitals and PSROs.
    Thompson RE
    Hospitals; 1980 Aug; 54(16):61-3. PubMed ID: 7190542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Medicare program; Peer Review Organizations: new PRO contracts for all states and territories and the District of Columbia--HCFA. Notice.
    Fed Regist; 1993 Mar; 58(39):12042-7. PubMed ID: 10124395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Watchdog on a short chain. How good are PPS's quality-of-care reviewers?
    Kotelchuck R
    Health PAC Bull; 1987 Jun; 17(3):19-22. PubMed ID: 10301612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The new scope of work: what it means to PROs and providers.
    Siegel SH
    Healthc Financ Manage; 1986 Aug; 40(8):64-8. PubMed ID: 10277300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. PSROs: origins, directions, and changing assumptions.
    Smits H
    Bull N Y Acad Med; 1982; 58(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 7052174
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. PRO limited review creates controversy, heavy workload.
    Johnsson J
    Contract Healthc; 1988 Sep; ():34-6. PubMed ID: 10302948
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. PRO Quality Intervention Plan (QIP).
    Elliott B
    Del Med J; 1990 May; 62(5):1019-20. PubMed ID: 2344893
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Utilization and quality control peer review organizations--a rose by any other name . . . ?
    Berg RN
    J Med Assoc Ga; 1982 Nov; 71(11):793-6. PubMed ID: 6890977
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quality assurance in health care--the federal government: PSRO.
    Munier WB
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1974 Jul; 31(7):660-3. PubMed ID: 4605000
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Implications of Medicare hospital utilization trends for long term home health care.
    Kelly JT; Shea MA; Ross JE
    Pride Inst J Long Term Home Health Care; 1987; 6(2):14-7. PubMed ID: 10301751
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. U.R., audit impact of PSRO's said improving.
    Hosp Peer Rev; 1978 Dec; 3(12):163-4. PubMed ID: 10273115
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Enhancing utilization review program results.
    Martin M; Milstein A; Loveland DV
    Health Cost Manage; 1988; 5(2):10-6. PubMed ID: 10286636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Medicare program; utilization and quality control peer review organization (PRO) reconsiderations and appeals--HCFA. Final rule.
    Fed Regist; 1985 Apr; 50(74):15364-74. PubMed ID: 10299992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Utilization management as a cost-containment strategy.
    Bailit HL; Sennett C
    Health Care Financ Rev Annu Suppl; 1991; ():87-93. PubMed ID: 10117120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hospital utilization review--an essential element in health care cost containment.
    Handel B
    Empl Benefits J; 1984 Sep; 9(3):8-12, 30. PubMed ID: 10273548
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Working with the PRO. Foundation for Health Care Evaluation.
    Minn Med; 1989 May; 72(5):287-9. PubMed ID: 2659957
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.