125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38815033)
1. Supersharers of fake news on Twitter.
Baribi-Bartov S; Swire-Thompson B; Grinberg N
Science; 2024 May; 384(6699):979-982. PubMed ID: 38815033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fake news on Twitter during the 2016 U.S. presidential election.
Grinberg N; Joseph K; Friedland L; Swire-Thompson B; Lazer D
Science; 2019 Jan; 363(6425):374-378. PubMed ID: 30679368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reconstruction of the socio-semantic dynamics of political activist Twitter networks-Method and application to the 2017 French presidential election.
Gaumont N; Panahi M; Chavalarias D
PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0201879. PubMed ID: 30231018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Psychological Appeal of Fake-News Attributions.
Axt JR; Landau MJ; Kay AC
Psychol Sci; 2020 Jul; 31(7):848-857. PubMed ID: 32672128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prior exposure increases perceived accuracy of fake news.
Pennycook G; Cannon TD; Rand DG
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2018 Dec; 147(12):1865-1880. PubMed ID: 30247057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fake news in the age of COVID-19: evolutional and psychobiological considerations.
Giotakos O
Psychiatriki; 2022 Sep; 33(3):183-186. PubMed ID: 35947862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Modeling the spread of fake news on Twitter.
Murayama T; Wakamiya S; Aramaki E; Kobayashi R
PLoS One; 2021; 16(4):e0250419. PubMed ID: 33886665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Political polarization of news media and influencers on Twitter in the 2016 and 2020 US presidential elections.
Flamino J; Galeazzi A; Feldman S; Macy MW; Cross B; Zhou Z; Serafino M; Bovet A; Makse HA; Szymanski BK
Nat Hum Behav; 2023 Jun; 7(6):904-916. PubMed ID: 36914806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The relationship between political affiliation and beliefs about sources of "fake news".
Michael RB; Breaux BO
Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2021 Feb; 6(1):6. PubMed ID: 33580444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. False Memories for Fake News During Ireland's Abortion Referendum.
Murphy G; Loftus EF; Grady RH; Levine LJ; Greene CM
Psychol Sci; 2019 Oct; 30(10):1449-1459. PubMed ID: 31432746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Psychology of Fake News.
Pennycook G; Rand DG
Trends Cogn Sci; 2021 May; 25(5):388-402. PubMed ID: 33736957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A New Application of Social Impact in Social Media for Overcoming Fake News in Health.
Pulido CM; Ruiz-Eugenio L; Redondo-Sama G; Villarejo-Carballido B
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Apr; 17(7):. PubMed ID: 32260048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Exposure to untrustworthy websites in the 2016 US election.
Guess AM; Nyhan B; Reifler J
Nat Hum Behav; 2020 May; 4(5):472-480. PubMed ID: 32123342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Nursing Organizations' Health Policy Content on Facebook and Twitter Preceding the 2016 United States Presidential Election.
Waddell A
J Adv Nurs; 2019 Jan; 75(1):119-128. PubMed ID: 30109719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The footprint of campaign strategies in Farsi Twitter: A case for 2021 Iranian presidential election.
Mohammadi S; Moradi P; Firouzabadi SM; Jafari G
PLoS One; 2022; 17(7):e0270822. PubMed ID: 35900976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Everyday non-partisan fake news: Sharing behavior, platform specificity, and detection.
Shephard MP; Robertson DJ; Huhe N; Anderson A
Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1118407. PubMed ID: 37255519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A digital media literacy intervention for older adults improves resilience to fake news.
Moore RC; Hancock JT
Sci Rep; 2022 Apr; 12(1):6008. PubMed ID: 35397631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning.
Pennycook G; Rand DG
Cognition; 2019 Jul; 188():39-50. PubMed ID: 29935897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An ideological asymmetry in the diffusion of moralized content on social media among political leaders.
Brady WJ; Wills JA; Burkart D; Jost JT; Van Bavel JJ
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Oct; 148(10):1802-1813. PubMed ID: 30589291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ratioing the President: An exploration of public engagement with Obama and Trump on Twitter.
Minot JR; Arnold MV; Alshaabi T; Danforth CM; Dodds PS
PLoS One; 2021; 16(4):e0248880. PubMed ID: 33852612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
