These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38815099)

  • 1. Quality, Reliability, Readability, and Accountability of Online Information on Leukocoria.
    Eleiwa TK; Dihan QA; Brown AD; Zaldivar AT; Abdelnaem SE; Sallam AB; Phillips PH; Elnahry AG; Elhusseiny AM
    J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2024; 61(5):332-338. PubMed ID: 38815099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quality, Reliability, Technical Quality, and Readability of Google Online Information on Childhood Glaucoma.
    Elhusseiny AM; Hassan AK; Hassan MA; Eleiwa TK; Ali HT; Abdelnaem S; Chauhan MZ; Shaikh O; Khouri AS; Sallam AB
    J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2024; 61(3):198-203. PubMed ID: 38112390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing parental comprehension of online resources on childhood pain.
    Ocmen E; Erdemir I; Aksu Erdost H; Hanci V
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2024 Jun; 103(25):e38569. PubMed ID: 38905405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Readability and Suitability of Online Patient Education Materials for Glaucoma.
    Martin CA; Khan S; Lee R; Do AT; Sridhar J; Crowell EL; Bowden EC
    Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2022; 5(5):525-530. PubMed ID: 35301989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quality, Reliability, and Readability of Online Information on Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension.
    Hassan AK; Eleiwa TK; Hassan MA; Sallam AB; Ali HT; Abdelnaem S; Gise R; Phillips PH; Elhusseiny AM
    J Neuroophthalmol; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38527126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Readability and quality assessment of online patient education materials for spinal and epidural anesthesia.
    Rai R; Wiseman JJ; Chau A; Wiseman SM
    Can J Anaesth; 2024 Aug; 71(8):1092-1102. PubMed ID: 38773007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Cross-Sectional Analysis of the Readability of Online Information Regarding Hip Osteoarthritis.
    Lim B; Chai A; Shaalan M
    Cureus; 2024 May; 16(5):e60536. PubMed ID: 38887325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing the Quality, Reliability, and Readability of Online Information on Dry Eye Disease.
    Oydanich M; Kuklinski E; Asbell PA
    Cornea; 2022 Aug; 41(8):1023-1028. PubMed ID: 35344972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Comprehensive Evaluation of the Quality, Readability, and Technical Quality of Online Information on Glaucoma.
    Shah R; Mahajan J; Oydanich M; Khouri AS
    Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2023; 6(1):93-99. PubMed ID: 35940574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluating the Readability, Quality, and Reliability of Online Patient Education Materials on Spinal Cord Stimulation.
    Gunduz ME; Matis GK; Ozduran E; Hanci V
    Turk Neurosurg; 2024; 34(4):588-599. PubMed ID: 38874237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Online educational materials for appendectomy patients have good quality but poor readability.
    Rai R; Landsberg A; Nguyen A; Wiseman SM
    Am J Surg; 2021 Jun; 221(6):1203-1210. PubMed ID: 33712262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Health Literacy in Clubfoot: A Quantitative Assessment of the Readability, Understandability and Actionability of Online Patient Education Material.
    Skalitzky MK; Gulbrandsen TR; Lorentzen W; Gao B; Shamrock AG; Weinstein SL; Morcuende JA
    Iowa Orthop J; 2021; 41(1):61-67. PubMed ID: 34552405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The quality, understandability, readability, and popularity of online educational materials for heart murmur.
    Arslan D; Sami Tutar M; Kozanhan B; Bagci Z
    Cardiol Young; 2020 Mar; 30(3):328-336. PubMed ID: 31875800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluating the readability, quality and reliability of online patient education materials on post-covid pain.
    Ozduran E; Büyükçoban S
    PeerJ; 2022; 10():e13686. PubMed ID: 35880220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How readable and quality are online patient education materials about Helicobacter pylori?: Assessment of the readability, quality and reliability.
    Yilmaz Hanci S
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2023 Oct; 102(43):e35543. PubMed ID: 37904459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of online patient education materials from major ophthalmologic associations.
    Huang G; Fang CH; Agarwal N; Bhagat N; Eloy JA; Langer PD
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2015 Apr; 133(4):449-54. PubMed ID: 25654639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Readability of online patient education material for foregut surgery.
    Chang M; Weiss B; Worrell S; Hsu CH; Ghaderi I
    Surg Endosc; 2024 Sep; 38(9):5259-5265. PubMed ID: 39009725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluating the Readability of Online Patient Education Materials for Trigeminal Neuralgia.
    Joseph P; Silva NA; Nanda A; Gupta G
    World Neurosurg; 2020 Dec; 144():e934-e938. PubMed ID: 32992056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating the readability, quality and reliability of online patient education materials on transcutaneuous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS).
    Erkin Y; Hanci V; Ozduran E
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2023 Apr; 102(16):e33529. PubMed ID: 37083809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analysis of the quality, accuracy, and readability of patient information on polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) on the internet available in English: a cross-sectional study.
    Vågenes H; Pranić SM
    Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2023 May; 21(1):44. PubMed ID: 37189154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.