116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38816076)
1. Concerns regarding the treatment effects of the Forsus fatigue-resistant device and mandibular anterior repositioning appliance.
Kumar V; Verma S; Verma RK; Singh SP
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2024 Jun; 165(6):609. PubMed ID: 38816076
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of Forsus fatigue-resistant device in a patient with Class I malocclusion and mandibular incisor agenesis.
Zhang R; Bai Y; Li S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jun; 145(6):817-27. PubMed ID: 24880853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Breakages using a unilateral fixed functional appliance: a case report using The Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device.
Ross AP; Gaffey BJ; Quick AN
J Orthod; 2007 Mar; 34(1):2-5. PubMed ID: 17347290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Maxillary molar distalization or mandibular enhancement: a cephalometric comparison of comprehensive orthodontic treatment including the pendulum and the Herbst appliances.
Burkhardt DR; McNamara JA; Baccetti T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Feb; 123(2):108-16. PubMed ID: 12594414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Treatment of division II malocclusion in young adult with Forsus fatigue-resistant device.
Krishna Nayak US; Goyal V
Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(2):289-91. PubMed ID: 22945727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An assessment of late fixed functional treatment and the stability of Forsus appliance effects.
Gao W; Li X; Bai Y
Aust Orthod J; 2014 May; 30(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 24968640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of the Forsus fatigue-resistant device and mandibular anterior repositioning appliance in Class II malocclusion treatment.
Nogueira CQ; Galvão Chiqueto KF; Freire Fernandes TM; Castanha Henriques JF; Janson G
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 Dec; 162(6):814-823. PubMed ID: 36202700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Queries regarding the effects of the Forsus fatigue-resistant device and mandibular anterior repositioning appliance.
Arora V; Gupta A; Sharma R
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2023 May; 163(5):588-589. PubMed ID: 37142349
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Treatment effects of the Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device used with miniscrew anchorage.
Aslan BI; Kucukkaraca E; Turkoz C; Dincer M
Angle Orthod; 2014 Jan; 84(1):76-87. PubMed ID: 23772682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical and clinical considerations in correcting skeletal class II malocclusion with Forsus™.
Adusumilli SP; Sudhakar P; Mummidi B; Varma DP; Arora S; Radhika A; Maheshwari A
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Nov; 13(6):918-24. PubMed ID: 23404028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An esthetic treatment outcome of orthognathic surgery and dentofacial orthopedics in class II treatment: a cephalometric study.
Kabbur KJ; Hemanth M; Patil GS; Sathyadeep V; Shamnur N; Harieesha KB; Praveen GR
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Sep; 13(5):602-6. PubMed ID: 23250160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Correction of a severe skeletal Class II occlusion with a fixed functional appliance anchored on mini-implants: a patient report.
Gandedkar NH; Revankar AV; Ganeshkar SV
World J Orthod; 2010; 11(4):369-79. PubMed ID: 21491004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Parameters affect orthodontic treatment: Part III. The tip-edge advantage and the unbelievable ability to unravel complicated anterior crowding.
Cronin T
Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2006; 17(3):49-50. PubMed ID: 17091924
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of treatment outcomes with crowned and banded mandibular anterior repositioning appliance (MARA) in Class II pubertal subjects: A retrospective cohort study.
Al-Jewair T; Ghorbaniparvar M; Franchi L; Flores-Mir C
Int Orthod; 2020 Jun; 18(2):297-307. PubMed ID: 32111577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Four TADs supported Herbst mechanics: A case report.
Manni A; Lupini D; Cozzani M
Int Orthod; 2019 Jun; 17(2):354-364. PubMed ID: 31036464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the effects of skeletal anchoraged Forsus FRD using miniplates inserted on mandibular symphysis: A new approach for the treatment of Class II malocclusion.
Unal T; Celikoglu M; Candirli C
Angle Orthod; 2015 May; 85(3):413-9. PubMed ID: 25279724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. KIDS: a new approach to distalize maxillary molars.
Karad A
World J Orthod; 2008; 9(3):244-54. PubMed ID: 18834007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mandibular lip bumper for molar torque control.
Celentano G; Longobardi A; Cannavale R; Perillo L
Prog Orthod; 2011; 12(1):90-2. PubMed ID: 21515237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Treatment of Skeletal Class II Malocclusion with Forsus Fatigue Resistance Appliance and Its Re-activation by Using Custom-made Crimp.
Aileni KR; Rachala MR; Dharmender SR; Rajesh V; Sandeep B
Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2016; 27(1):33-6. PubMed ID: 27319039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mandibular arch changes following nonextraction treatment.
Valiathan A; Thomas B
Aust Orthod J; 2006 May; 22(1):68; author reply 68. PubMed ID: 16792247
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
