These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38816855)

  • 1. The impact of repeated item development training on the prediction of medical faculty members' item difficulty index.
    Lee HY; Yune SJ; Lee SY; Im S; Kam BS
    BMC Med Educ; 2024 May; 24(1):599. PubMed ID: 38816855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Are faculty predictions or item taxonomies useful for estimating the outcome of multiple-choice examinations?
    Kibble JD; Johnson T
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2011 Dec; 35(4):396-401. PubMed ID: 22139777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Minimum accepted competency examination: test item analysis.
    McCrossan P; Nicholson A; McCallion N
    BMC Med Educ; 2022 May; 22(1):400. PubMed ID: 35614439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of a longitudinal faculty development program on the quality of multiple-choice question item writing in medical education.
    Owolabi LF; Adamu B; Taura MG; Isa AI; Jibo AM; Abdul-Razek R; Alharthi MM; Alghamdi M
    Ann Afr Med; 2021; 20(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 33727512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Faculty and resident evaluations of medical students on a surgery clerkship correlate poorly with standardized exam scores.
    Goldstein SD; Lindeman B; Colbert-Getz J; Arbella T; Dudas R; Lidor A; Sacks B
    Am J Surg; 2014 Feb; 207(2):231-5. PubMed ID: 24239528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Peer review improves psychometric characteristics of multiple choice questions.
    Abozaid H; Park YS; Tekian A
    Med Teach; 2017 Apr; 39(sup1):S50-S54. PubMed ID: 28103718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Writing Multiple Choice Questions-Has the Student Become the Master?
    Pham H; Court-Kowalski S; Chan H; Devitt P
    Teach Learn Med; 2023; 35(3):356-367. PubMed ID: 35491868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Etiquette for medical students' email communication with faculty members: a single-institution study.
    Kim DH; Yoon HB; Yoo DM; Lee SM; Jung HY; Kim SJ; Shin JS; Lee S; Yim JJ
    BMC Med Educ; 2016 Apr; 16():129. PubMed ID: 27121179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Faculty development on item writing substantially improves item quality.
    Naeem N; van der Vleuten C; Alfaris EA
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2012 Aug; 17(3):369-76. PubMed ID: 21837548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Factors in faculty evaluation of medical students' performance.
    Pulito AR; Donnelly MB; Plymale M
    Med Educ; 2007 Jul; 41(7):667-75. PubMed ID: 17614887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effectiveness of longitudinal faculty development programs on MCQs items writing skills: A follow-up study.
    Abdulghani HM; Irshad M; Haque S; Ahmad T; Sattar K; Khalil MS
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(10):e0185895. PubMed ID: 29016659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Faculty Evaluations Correlate Poorly with Medical Student Examination Performance in a Fourth-Year Emergency Medicine Clerkship.
    Dubosh NM; Fisher J; Lewis J; Ullman EA
    J Emerg Med; 2017 Jun; 52(6):850-855. PubMed ID: 28341085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Medical Students' Progress in Detecting and Interpreting Visual and Auditory Clinical Findings.
    Han H; Williams R; Hingle S; Klamen DL; Rull GM; Clark T; Daniels J
    Teach Learn Med; 2020; 32(4):380-388. PubMed ID: 32281403
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Item analysis: the impact of distractor efficiency on the difficulty index and discrimination power of multiple-choice items.
    Rezigalla AA; Eleragi AMESA; Elhussein AB; Alfaifi J; ALGhamdi MA; Al Ameer AY; Yahia AIO; Mohammed OA; Adam MIE
    BMC Med Educ; 2024 Apr; 24(1):445. PubMed ID: 38658912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Will a Short Training Session Improve Multiple-Choice Item-Writing Quality by Dental School Faculty? A Pilot Study.
    Dellinges MA; Curtis DA
    J Dent Educ; 2017 Aug; 81(8):948-955. PubMed ID: 28765439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Re-using questions in classroom-based assessment: An exploratory study at the undergraduate medical education level.
    Joncas SX; St-Onge C; Bourque S; Farand P
    Perspect Med Educ; 2018 Dec; 7(6):373-378. PubMed ID: 30421331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Item analysis of examinations in the Faculty of Medicine of Tunis.
    Hermi A; Achour W
    Tunis Med; 2016 Apr; 94(4):247-252. PubMed ID: 27704506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Faculty attitudes towards medical communication and their perceptions of students' communication skills training at Dalhousie University.
    Langille DB; Kaufman DM; Laidlaw TA; Sargeant J; MacLeod H
    Med Educ; 2001 Jun; 35(6):548-54. PubMed ID: 11380857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Postexamination item analysis of undergraduate pediatric multiple-choice questions exam: implications for developing a validated question Bank.
    Rashwan NI; Aref SR; Nayel OA; Rizk MH
    BMC Med Educ; 2024 Feb; 24(1):168. PubMed ID: 38383427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is a picture worth a thousand words: an analysis of the difficulty and discrimination parameters of illustrated vs. text-alone vignettes in histology multiple choice questions.
    Holland J; O'Sullivan R; Arnett R
    BMC Med Educ; 2015 Oct; 15():184. PubMed ID: 26502882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.