These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38817290)

  • 41. [Effects of robotic and laparoscopic-assisted surgery on lymph node dissection and short-term outcomes in patients with Siewert II adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction].
    Wang D; Cao S; Tan X; Liu S; Liu X; Niu Z; Chen D; Wang D; Zhang J; Lv L; Li Y; Jiang H; Guo D; Li Y; Li Z; Zhou Y
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Feb; 22(2):156-163. PubMed ID: 30799538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The impact of surgical approach on short- and long-term outcomes after rectal cancer resection in elderly patients: a national cancer database propensity score matched comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and open approaches.
    Horsey ML; Parascandola SA; Sparks AD; Hota S; Ng M; Obias V
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Feb; 36(2):1269-1277. PubMed ID: 33638109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgery for rectal cancer: medium-term comparative outcomes from a multicenter study.
    Corbellini C; Biffi R; Luca F; Chiappa A; Costa S; Bertani E; Bona S; Lombardi D; Tamayo D; Botteri E; Andreoni B
    Tumori; 2016 Aug; 102(4):414-21. PubMed ID: 27373785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Propensity score-matched analysis of the short-term outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer.
    Obatake M; Hotchi M; Ishimura N; Kanzaki M; Yoshikawa M; Tokuda K; Watanabe M; Kotegawa H; Yoshiyama H; Ohtani H; Harada M
    Asian J Endosc Surg; 2023 Jul; 16(3):455-464. PubMed ID: 37076427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. A short-term study of laparoscopic-dominant individualised levator ani resection in abdominoperineal resection: A retrospective investigation.
    Xue X; Jian C; Fang Y; Luo L; Guo Y; Ling B; Cai M
    J Minim Access Surg; 2024 Jan; 20(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 37706404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The severity of postoperative complications after robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: A systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression.
    Wang Y; Liu Y; Han G; Yi B; Zhu S
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(10):e0239909. PubMed ID: 33002066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Evaluation of short-term outcomes after laparoscopically assisted abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer.
    Wang Z; Zhang XM; Liang JW; Hu JJ; Zeng WG; Zhou ZX
    ANZ J Surg; 2014 Nov; 84(11):842-6. PubMed ID: 24456258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Sphincter-preserving effect of robotic-assisted intersphincteric resection for ultra-low rectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis.
    Sun L; Zhou J; Ji L; Zhao S; Li R; Fu Y; Wang W; Qian C; Sun Q; Wang D
    J Robot Surg; 2024 Feb; 18(1):83. PubMed ID: 38386188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [Short-term clinical efficacy of robotic radical resection for high rectal cancer with transvaginal specimen extraction].
    Gao GM; Liu DN; Li TY
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Dec; 22(12):1124-1130. PubMed ID: 31874527
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Local control of sphincter-preserving procedures and abdominoperineal resection for locally advanced low rectal cancer: Propensity score matched analysis.
    Okamura R; Hida K; Yamaguchi T; Akagi T; Konishi T; Yamamoto M; Ota M; Matoba S; Bando H; Goto S; Sakai Y; Watanabe M; ; Watanabe K; Otsuka K; Takemasa I; Tanaka K; Ikeda M; Matsuda C; Fukuda M; Hasegawa J; Akamoto S; Shiozawa M; Tsuruta A; Akiyoshi T; Kato T; Tsukamoto S; Ito M; Naito M; Kanazawa A; Takahashi T; Ueki T; Hayashi Y; Morita S; Yamaguchi T; Nakanishi M; Hasegawa H; Okamoto K; Teraishi F; Sumi Y; Tashiro J; Yatsuoka T; Nishimura Y; Okita K; Kobatake T; Horie H; Miyakura Y; Ro H; Nagakari K; Hidaka E; Umemoto T; Nishigori H; Murata K; Wakayama F; Makizumi R; Fujii S; Sunami E; Kobayashi H; Nakagawa R; Enomoto T; Ohnuma S; Higashijima J; Ozawa H; Ashida K; Fujita F; Uehara K; Maruyama S; Ohyama M; Yamamoto S; Hinoi T; Yoshimitsu M; Okajima M; Tanimura S; Kawasaki M; Ide Y; Hazama S; Watanabe J; Inagaki D; Toyokawa A
    Ann Gastroenterol Surg; 2017 Sep; 1(3):199-207. PubMed ID: 29863157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Robotic versus laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision: a retrospective multicenter study with propensity score matching.
    Tian Y; Xiong D; Xu M; Fan Q; Zheng H; Shen H; Huang B; Wang L; Li C; Zhang A; Liu B; Li F; Gao F; Tong W
    Front Oncol; 2023; 13():1187476. PubMed ID: 37333806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. [Effect of peritoneum reconstruction on postoperative complications after laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer].
    Gao LF; Chen DL; Chen BY; Li C; Wang XS; Yu PW; Tang B
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2021 Dec; 24(12):1079-1085. PubMed ID: 34923791
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Comparative survival risks in patients undergoing abdominoperineal resection and sphincter-saving operation for rectal cancer: a 10-year cohort analysis using propensity score matching.
    Lee HG; Kim CW; Lee JL; Yoon YS; Park IJ; Lim SB; Yu CS; Kim JC
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2022 May; 37(5):989-997. PubMed ID: 35378615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of eight studies.
    Xiong B; Ma L; Huang W; Zhao Q; Cheng Y; Liu J
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2015 Mar; 19(3):516-26. PubMed ID: 25394387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The use of robotic or laparoscopic stapler in rectal cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Tejedor P; Sagias F; Flashman K; Kandala NL; Khan J
    J Robot Surg; 2020 Dec; 14(6):829-833. PubMed ID: 32691353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Minimally Invasive Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Prete FP; Pezzolla A; Prete F; Testini M; Marzaioli R; Patriti A; Jimenez-Rodriguez RM; Gurrado A; Strippoli GFM
    Ann Surg; 2018 Jun; 267(6):1034-1046. PubMed ID: 28984644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [Application of robotic and laparoscopic radical total gastrectomy to gastric cancer patients with body mass index ≥24 kg/m
    Cong T; Liu G; Zhang K; Gao Y; Cui J; Lan X; Teng D; Huo X; Wei B
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Mar; 21(3):318-324. PubMed ID: 29577221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Comparison of laparoscopic versus robot-assisted versus transanal total mesorectal excision surgery for rectal cancer: a retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study of short-term outcomes.
    Hol JC; Burghgraef TA; Rutgers MLW; Crolla RMPH; van Geloven NAW; Hompes R; Leijtens JWA; Polat F; Pronk A; Smits AB; Tuynman JB; Verdaasdonk EGG; Consten ECJ; Sietses C
    Br J Surg; 2021 Nov; 108(11):1380-1387. PubMed ID: 34370834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Trans-perineal minimally invasive surgery during laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer.
    Yasukawa D; Hori T; Kadokawa Y; Kato S; Aisu Y; Hasegawa S
    Surg Endosc; 2019 Feb; 33(2):437-447. PubMed ID: 29987569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Robotic versus laparoscopic left colectomy with complete mesocolic excision for left-sided colon cancer: a multicentre study with propensity score matching analysis.
    Zheng H; Wang Q; Fu T; Wei Z; Ye J; Huang B; Li C; Liu B; Zhang A; Li F; Gao F; Tong W
    Tech Coloproctol; 2023 Jul; 27(7):569-578. PubMed ID: 37014449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.