These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38819969)

  • 1. Addressing Model Uncertainties in Finite Element Simulation of Electrically Stimulated Implants for Critical-Size Mandibular Defects.
    Raben H; Kammerer PW; van Rienen U
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2024 May; PP():. PubMed ID: 38819969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Uncertainpy: A Python Toolbox for Uncertainty Quantification and Sensitivity Analysis in Computational Neuroscience.
    Tennøe S; Halnes G; Einevoll GT
    Front Neuroinform; 2018; 12():49. PubMed ID: 30154710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Unsupervised stochastic learning and reduced order modeling for global sensitivity analysis in cardiac electrophysiology models.
    El Moçayd N; Belhamadia Y; Seaid M
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2024 Jul; 255():108311. PubMed ID: 39032242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sensitivity of microwave ablation models to tissue biophysical properties: A first step toward probabilistic modeling and treatment planning.
    Sebek J; Albin N; Bortel R; Natarajan B; Prakash P
    Med Phys; 2016 May; 43(5):2649. PubMed ID: 27147374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of uncertainties in the material properties of brain tissue on the probabilistic volume of tissue activated.
    Schmidt C; Grant P; Lowery M; van Rienen U
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2013 May; 60(5):1378-87. PubMed ID: 23269746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Finite volume analysis of temperature effects induced by active MRI implants: 2. Defects on active MRI implants causing hot spots.
    Busch MH; Vollmann W; Grönemeyer DH
    Biomed Eng Online; 2006 May; 5():35. PubMed ID: 16729878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comprehensive Uncertainty Quantification and Sensitivity Analysis for Cardiac Action Potential Models.
    Pathmanathan P; Cordeiro JM; Gray RA
    Front Physiol; 2019; 10():721. PubMed ID: 31297060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Uncertainty optimization of dental implant based on finite element method, global sensitivity analysis and support vector regression.
    Li H; Shi M; Liu X; Shi Y
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2019 Feb; 233(2):232-243. PubMed ID: 30565501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Modeling of an optimized electrostimulative hip revision system under consideration of uncertainty in the conductivity of bone tissue.
    Schmidt C; Zimmermann U; van Rienen U
    IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2015 Jul; 19(4):1321-30. PubMed ID: 25898285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mechanobiologically optimization of a 3D titanium-mesh implant for mandibular large defect: A simulated study.
    Gao H; Li X; Wang C; Ji P; Wang C
    Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2019 Nov; 104():109934. PubMed ID: 31500061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quantification of tissue property and perfusion uncertainties in hyperthermia treatment planning: Multianalysis using polynomial chaos expansion.
    Groen JA; Crezee J; van Laarhoven HWM; Bijlsma MF; Kok HP
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2023 Oct; 240():107675. PubMed ID: 37339535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Global sensitivity study for irreversible electroporation: Towards treatment planning under uncertainty.
    Lakshmi Narasimhan P; Tokoutsi Z; Baroli D; Baragona M; Veroy K; Maessen R; Ritter A
    Med Phys; 2023 Mar; 50(3):1290-1304. PubMed ID: 36635955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Uncertainty quantification implementations in human hemodynamic flows.
    Ninos G; Bartzis V; Merlemis N; Sarris IE
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2021 May; 203():106021. PubMed ID: 33721602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Do Metaphyseal Cones and Stems Provide Any Biomechanical Advantage for Moderate Contained Tibial Defects in Revision TKA? A Finite-Element Analysis Based on a Cadaver Model.
    Quevedo González FJ; Meyers KN; Schraut N; Mehrotra KG; Lipman JD; Wright TM; Ast MP
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2021 Nov; 479(11):2534-2546. PubMed ID: 34351312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of bone mass density and alveolar bone resorption on stress in implant restoration of free-end edentulous posterior mandible: Finite element analysis of double-factor sensitivity.
    Ye Z; Ye H; Wu Y; Jiang Z; Yao H; Xu X; Zhang Y; Du W; Li W; Zheng Y; Ye P; Ding X; Wu L
    Ann Anat; 2024 Apr; 253():152210. PubMed ID: 38244942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantification of uncertainties in brain tissue conductivity in a heterogeneous model of deep brain stimulation using a non-intrusive projection approach.
    Schmidt C; van Rienen U
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2012; 2012():4136-9. PubMed ID: 23366838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Voxel-based micro-finite element analysis of dental implants in a human cadaveric mandible: Tissue modulus assignment and sensitivity analyses.
    Mao Q; Su K; Zhou Y; Hossaini-Zadeh M; Lewis GS; Du J
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2019 Jun; 94():229-237. PubMed ID: 30925312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An automatic approach for calibrating dielectric bone properties by combining finite-element and optimization software tools.
    Su Y; Kluess D; Mittelmeier W; van Rienen U; Bader R
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2016 Sep; 19(12):1306-13. PubMed ID: 26777343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stimulation-induced changes at the electrode-tissue interface and their influence on deep brain stimulation.
    Evers J; Sridhar K; Liegey J; Brady J; Jahns H; Lowery M
    J Neural Eng; 2022 Jul; 19(4):. PubMed ID: 35728575
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of Head Tissue Conductivity Uncertainties on EEG Dipole Reconstruction.
    Vorwerk J; Aydin Ü; Wolters CH; Butson CR
    Front Neurosci; 2019; 13():531. PubMed ID: 31231178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.