105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38820806)
1. Multicentric characterization of organ-based tube current modulation in head computed tomography: A dosimetric and image quality study.
Pondard S; Desport C; Munier M; Kien N; Rousseau H; Merignac O; Popotte C; Moreno R
Phys Med; 2024 Jun; 122():103389. PubMed ID: 38820806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. CT head-scan dosimetry in an anthropomorphic phantom and associated measurement of ACR accreditation-phantom imaging metrics under clinically representative scan conditions.
Brunner CC; Stern SH; Minniti R; Parry MI; Skopec M; Chakrabarti K
Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081917. PubMed ID: 23927331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Image quality of conventional images of dual-layer SPECTRAL CT: A phantom study.
van Ommen F; Bennink E; Vlassenbroek A; Dankbaar JW; Schilham AMR; Viergever MA; de Jong HWAM
Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):3031-3042. PubMed ID: 29749624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comprehensive assessment of physical image quality of five different scanners for head CT imaging as clinically used at a single hospital centre-A phantom study.
Barca P; Paolicchi F; Aringhieri G; Palmas F; Marfisi D; Fantacci ME; Caramella D; Giannelli M
PLoS One; 2021; 16(1):e0245374. PubMed ID: 33444367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Technical Note: Phantom study to evaluate the dose and image quality effects of a computed tomography organ-based tube current modulation technique.
Gandhi D; Crotty DJ; Stevens GM; Schmidt TG
Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6572-8. PubMed ID: 26520748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantification and homogenization of image noise between two CT scanner models.
Einstein SA; Rong XJ; Jensen CT; Liu X
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Jan; 21(1):174-178. PubMed ID: 31859454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Technical assessment of a mobile CT scanner for image-guided brachytherapy.
Chernavsky NE; Morcos M; Wu P; Viswanathan AN; Siewerdsen JH
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Oct; 20(10):187-200. PubMed ID: 31578811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Image quality and age-specific dose estimation in head and chest CT examinations with organ-based tube-current modulation.
Yamauchi-Kawaura C; Yamauchi M; Imai K; Ikeda M; Aoyama T
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Dec; 157(2):193-205. PubMed ID: 23734058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Organ-based tube current modulation in chest CT. A comparison of three vendors.
Mussmann BR; Mørup SD; Skov PM; Foley S; Brenøe AS; Eldahl F; Jørgensen GM; Precht H
Radiography (Lond); 2021 Feb; 27(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 32402706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Technical Note: Evaluation of a 160-mm/256-row CT scanner for whole-heart quantitative myocardial perfusion imaging.
So A; Imai Y; Nett B; Jackson J; Nett L; Hsieh J; Wisenberg G; Teefy P; Yadegari A; Islam A; Lee TY
Med Phys; 2016 Aug; 43(8):4821. PubMed ID: 27487900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The impact of automatic tube current modulation related settings of a modern GE CT scanner on image quality and patient dose; details do matter.
Tsalafoutas IA; AlKhazzam S; Kharita MH
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2024 Jun; 25(6):e14356. PubMed ID: 38659159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The impact of vertical off-centering on image noise and breast dose in chest CT with organ-based tube current modulation: A phantom study.
Mäkelä T; Kortesniemi M; Kaasalainen T
Phys Med; 2022 Aug; 100():153-163. PubMed ID: 35853275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dose reduction to anterior surfaces with organ-based tube-current modulation: evaluation of performance in a phantom study.
Duan X; Wang J; Christner JA; Leng S; Grant KL; McCollough CH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Sep; 197(3):689-95. PubMed ID: 21862813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quantitation of clinical feedback on image quality differences between two CT scanner models.
Bache ST; Stauduhar PJ; Liu X; Loyer EM; John RX
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 18(2):163-169. PubMed ID: 28300384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Methods for CT automatic exposure control protocol translation between scanner platforms.
McKenney SE; Seibert JA; Lamba R; Boone JM
J Am Coll Radiol; 2014 Mar; 11(3):285-91. PubMed ID: 24589404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Performance evaluation of an 85-cm-bore X-ray computed tomography scanner designed for radiation oncology and comparison with current diagnostic CT scanners.
Garcia-Ramirez JL; Mutic S; Dempsey JF; Low DA; Purdy JA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Mar; 52(4):1123-31. PubMed ID: 11958910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Design and use of a phantom for testing and comparing the performance of computed tomography automatic tube current modulation systems.
Sookpeng S; Martin CJ; Krisanachinda A
J Radiol Prot; 2020 Sep; 40(3):753-773. PubMed ID: 32303017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Organ-based computed tomographic (CT) radiation dose reduction to the lenses: impact on image quality for CT of the head.
Reimann AJ; Davison C; Bjarnason T; Thakur Y; Kryzmyk K; Mayo J; Nicolaou S
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2012; 36(3):334-8. PubMed ID: 22592620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Volume computed tomography air kerma index and image quality evaluation in Brazil.
Mecca FA; Andrade ME; Jakubiak RR; Khoury HJ; Dias SK; Miquelin CA; Nader A
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Mar; 148(4):452-6. PubMed ID: 21561947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of selected photon shield and organ-based tube current modulation for radiation dose reduction in head computed tomography: A phantom study.
Yuan Z; Liu T; Zhang B; Wu J; He Y; Chen T; Zhang Z; Li C; Liu Y
J Xray Sci Technol; 2023; 31(4):745-756. PubMed ID: 37092211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
