115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38820806)
21. In-patient to isocenter KERMA ratios in CT.
Huda W; Ogden KM; Lavallee RL; Roskopf ML; Scalzetti EM
Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5362-9. PubMed ID: 21992356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of different phantom designs for CT scanner automatic tube current modulation system tests.
Sookpeng S; Martin CJ; Gentle DJ
J Radiol Prot; 2013 Dec; 33(4):735-61. PubMed ID: 24025482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Head CT dose reduction with organ-based tube current modulation.
Ota J; Yokota H; Kobayashi T; Ogata Y; Kubo T; Chida K; Masuda Y; Uno T
Med Phys; 2022 Mar; 49(3):1964-1971. PubMed ID: 35060639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Utilizing a simple CT dosimetry phantom for the comprehension of the operational characteristics of CT AEC systems.
Tsalafoutas IA; Varsamidis A; Thalassinou S; Efstathopoulos EP
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111918. PubMed ID: 24320451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Quantitative comparison of noise texture across CT scanners from different manufacturers.
Solomon JB; Christianson O; Samei E
Med Phys; 2012 Oct; 39(10):6048-55. PubMed ID: 23039643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Evaluation of an organ-based tube current modulation tool in pediatric CT examinations.
Papadakis AE; Damilakis J
Eur Radiol; 2020 Oct; 30(10):5728-5737. PubMed ID: 32435930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Setting up computed tomography automatic tube current modulation systems.
Martin CJ; Sookpeng S
J Radiol Prot; 2016 Sep; 36(3):R74-R95. PubMed ID: 27485613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Characteristic image quality of a third generation dual-source MDCT scanner: Noise, resolution, and detectability.
Solomon J; Wilson J; Samei E
Med Phys; 2015 Aug; 42(8):4941-53. PubMed ID: 26233220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effect of x-ray tube parameters and iodine concentration on image quality and radiation dose in cerebral pediatric and adult CT angiography: a phantom study.
Papadakis AE; Perisinakis K; Raissaki M; Damilakis J
Invest Radiol; 2013 Apr; 48(4):192-9. PubMed ID: 23344518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Lens dose in routine head CT: comparison of different optimization methods with anthropomorphic phantoms.
Nikupaavo U; Kaasalainen T; Reijonen V; Ahonen SM; Kortesniemi M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jan; 204(1):117-23. PubMed ID: 25539246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. COMPARISON OF ORGAN-BASED TUBE CURRENT MODULATION AND BISMUTH SHIELDING IN CHEST CT: EFFECT ON THE IMAGE QUALITY AND THE PATIENT DOSE.
Kotiaho A; Manninen AL; Nikkinen J; Nieminen MT
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Nov; 185(1):42-48. PubMed ID: 30544171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A routine quality assurance test for CT automatic exposure control systems.
Iball GR; Moore AC; Crawford EJ
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 17(4):291-306. PubMed ID: 27455490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Use of automatic tube current modulation with a standardized noise index in young children undergoing chest computed tomography scans with 64-slice multidetector computed tomography.
Peng Y; Li J; Ma D; Zhang Q; Liu Y; Zeng J; Sun G
Acta Radiol; 2009 Dec; 50(10):1175-81. PubMed ID: 19922316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A systematic task-based image quality assessment of photon-counting and energy integrating CT as a function of reconstruction kernel and phantom size.
Bhattarai M; Bache S; Abadi E; Samei E
Med Phys; 2024 Feb; 51(2):1047-1060. PubMed ID: 37469179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Dose Reduction for Sinus and Temporal Bone Imaging Using Photon-Counting Detector CT With an Additional Tin Filter.
Rajendran K; Voss BA; Zhou W; Tao S; DeLone DR; Lane JI; Weaver JM; Carlson ML; Fletcher JG; McCollough CH; Leng S
Invest Radiol; 2020 Feb; 55(2):91-100. PubMed ID: 31770297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Multi-detector row CT attenuation measurements: assessment of intra- and interscanner variability with an anthropomorphic body CT phantom.
Birnbaum BA; Hindman N; Lee J; Babb JS
Radiology; 2007 Jan; 242(1):109-19. PubMed ID: 17185663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A methodology for image quality evaluation of advanced CT systems.
Wilson JM; Christianson OI; Richard S; Samei E
Med Phys; 2013 Mar; 40(3):031908. PubMed ID: 23464323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Automatic exposure control in pediatric and adult multidetector CT examinations: a phantom study on dose reduction and image quality.
Papadakis AE; Perisinakis K; Damilakis J
Med Phys; 2008 Oct; 35(10):4567-76. PubMed ID: 18975703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Objective image characterization of a spectral CT scanner with dual-layer detector.
Ozguner O; Dhanantwari A; Halliburton S; Wen G; Utrup S; Jordan D
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Jan; 63(2):025027. PubMed ID: 29185436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Intraoperative cone-beam CT for guidance of head and neck surgery: Assessment of dose and image quality using a C-arm prototype.
Daly MJ; Siewerdsen JH; Moseley DJ; Jaffray DA; Irish JC
Med Phys; 2006 Oct; 33(10):3767-80. PubMed ID: 17089842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
