These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38821544)

  • 21. Novel Surgical Strategies in the Treatment of Gynecological Malignancies.
    Angeles MA; Martínez-Gómez C; Migliorelli F; Voglimacci M; Figurelli J; Motton S; Tanguy Le Gac Y; Ferron G; Martinez A
    Curr Treat Options Oncol; 2018 Nov; 19(12):73. PubMed ID: 30411170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Current analysis of the survival implications for minimally invasive surgery in the treatment of early-stage cervix cancer.
    Micha JP; Rettenmaier MA; Bohart RD; Goldstein BH
    J Robot Surg; 2024 Feb; 18(1):80. PubMed ID: 38366169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Minimal-invasive or open approach for surgery of early cervical cancer: the treatment center matters.
    Gennari P; Gerken M; Mészáros J; Klinkhammer-Schalke M; Ortmann O; Eggemann H; Ignatov A
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2021 Aug; 304(2):503-510. PubMed ID: 33483846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A Novel Technique to Minimize Contamination for Cervical Cancer Surgery Patients.
    Martino MA; Bixel K; Johnson AM; Wejkszner T; Jacobs A; Lazaro J; Makarova E; Thomas MB; Fowler J
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(7):1624-1630. PubMed ID: 31931144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: Volume-outcome relationship in the early experience period.
    Matsuo K; Matsuzaki S; Mandelbaum RS; Chang EJ; Klar M; Matsushima K; Grubbs BH; Roman LD; Wright JD
    Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Aug; 158(2):390-396. PubMed ID: 32473728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Minimally invasive surgery versus laparotomy for radical hysterectomy in the management of early-stage cervical cancer: Survival outcomes.
    Brandt B; Sioulas V; Basaran D; Kuhn T; LaVigne K; Gardner GJ; Sonoda Y; Chi DS; Long Roche KC; Mueller JJ; Jewell EL; Broach VA; Zivanovic O; Abu-Rustum NR; Leitao MM
    Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Mar; 156(3):591-597. PubMed ID: 31918996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Survival after minimally invasive radical hysterectomy without using uterine manipulator for early-stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Li RZ; Sun LF; Li R; Wang HJ
    BJOG; 2023 Jan; 130(2):176-183. PubMed ID: 36331008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Treatment of early cervical cancer : Back to the future].
    Guani B; Balaya V; Mathevet P
    Rev Med Suisse; 2020 Oct; 16(712):2046-2049. PubMed ID: 33112518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Same-day discharge is feasible and safe in patients undergoing minimally invasive staging for gynecologic malignancies.
    Penner KR; Fleming ND; Barlavi L; Axtell AE; Lentz SE
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):186.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25132462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Oncologic outcomes of minimally invasive versus open radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical carcinoma and tumor size
    Nasioudis D; Albright BB; Ko EM; Haggerty AF; Giuntoli Ii RL; Kim SH; Morgan MA; Latif NA
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2021 Jul; 31(7):983-990. PubMed ID: 34016701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Regarding "30-day Postoperative Adverse Events in Minimally Invasive versus Open Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Early-stage Cervical Cancer".
    Bogani G; Golia D'Auge T; Muzii L; Panici PB; Di Donato V
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2023 Feb; 30(2):164. PubMed ID: 36442751
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Outcomes of Minimally Invasive versus Open Radical Hysterectomy for Early Stage Cervical Cancer Incorporating 2018 FIGO Staging.
    Levine MD; Brown J; Crane EK; Tait DL; Naumann RW
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Apr; 28(4):824-828. PubMed ID: 32730990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The impact of modern preoperative high-dose-rate brachytherapy in early-stage cervical cancer.
    Varela Cagetti L; Gonzague-Casabianca L; Zemmour C; Lambaudie E; Houvenaeghel G; Provansal M; Sabatier R; Sabiani L; Blache G; Jauffret C; Ferré M; Mailleux H; Paciencia M; Tallet A
    Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Apr; 161(1):166-172. PubMed ID: 33563488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Tumor Handling of Early-stage Cervical Cancer: A Literature Analysis of Villoglandular Adenocarcinoma of the Cervix.
    Dietl A; Aumann K; Beckmann MW
    Anticancer Res; 2020 Jun; 40(6):3049-3053. PubMed ID: 32487598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Radical Trachelectomy for Early Stage Cervical Cancer.
    Costales A; Michener C; Escobar-Rodriguez PF
    Curr Treat Options Oncol; 2018 Nov; 19(12):75. PubMed ID: 30450531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Investigating the possible impact of peritoneal tumor exposure amongst women with early stage cervical cancer treated with minimally invasive approach.
    Pedone Anchora L; Bizzarri N; Kucukmetin A; Turco LC; Gallotta V; Carbone V; Rundle S; Ratnavelu N; Cosentino F; Chiantera V; Fagotti A; Fedele C; Gomes N; Ferrandina G; Scambia G
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2021 May; 47(5):1090-1097. PubMed ID: 33039294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Minimization of curative surgery for treatment of early cervical cancer: a review.
    Arimoto T; Kawana K; Adachi K; Ikeda Y; Nagasaka K; Tsuruga T; Yamashita A; Oda K; Ishikawa M; Kasamatsu T; Onda T; Konishi I; Yoshikawa H; Yaegashi N;
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2015 Jul; 45(7):611-6. PubMed ID: 25888708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Impact of surgical approach on oncologic outcomes in women undergoing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.
    Cusimano MC; Baxter NN; Gien LT; Moineddin R; Liu N; Dossa F; Willows K; Ferguson SE
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Dec; 221(6):619.e1-619.e24. PubMed ID: 31288006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Lymph Node Ratio Is a Strong Prognostic Factor in Patients with Early-Stage Cervical Cancer Undergoing Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy.
    Kim SI; Kim TH; Lee M; Kim HS; Chung HH; Lee TS; Jeon HW; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS
    Yonsei Med J; 2021 Mar; 62(3):231-239. PubMed ID: 33635013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of survival outcomes between minimally invasive surgery and conventional open surgery for radical hysterectomy as primary treatment in patients with stage IB1-IIA2 cervical cancer.
    Kim SI; Cho JH; Seol A; Kim YI; Lee M; Kim HS; Chung HH; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS
    Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Apr; 153(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 30642625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.