156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38822255)
1. Development of environmental DNA metabarcoding primers for marine mollusks and comparison with published primers.
Shi X; Jiang Y; Cao L; Zeng C
BMC Ecol Evol; 2024 May; 24(1):73. PubMed ID: 38822255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparing eDNA metabarcoding primers for assessing fish communities in a biodiverse estuary.
Kumar G; Reaume AM; Farrell E; Gaither MR
PLoS One; 2022; 17(6):e0266720. PubMed ID: 35714082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A manager's guide to using eDNA metabarcoding in marine ecosystems.
Gold Z; Wall AR; Schweizer TM; Pentcheff ND; Curd EE; Barber PH; Meyer RS; Wayne R; Stolzenbach K; Prickett K; Luedy J; Wetzer R
PeerJ; 2022; 10():e14071. PubMed ID: 36405018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Enhancing amphibian biomonitoring through eDNA metabarcoding.
Mu Y; Zhang J; Yang J; Wu J; Zhang Y; Yu H; Zhang X
Mol Ecol Resour; 2024 May; 24(4):e13931. PubMed ID: 38345249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost-effort analysis of Baited Remote Underwater Video (BRUV) and environmental DNA (eDNA) in monitoring marine ecological communities.
Clark AJ; Atkinson SR; Scarponi V; Cane T; Geraldi NR; Hendy IW; Shipway JR; Peck M
PeerJ; 2024; 12():e17091. PubMed ID: 38708339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Environmental DNA metabarcoding reflects spatiotemporal fish community shifts in the Scheldt estuary.
Van Driessche C; Everts T; Neyrinck S; Halfmaerten D; Verschelde P; Breine J; Bonte D; Brys R
Sci Total Environ; 2024 Jul; 934():173242. PubMed ID: 38763188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Environmental RNA as a Tool for Marine Community Biodiversity Assessments.
Giroux MS; Reichman JR; Langknecht T; Burgess RM; Ho KT
Sci Rep; 2022 Oct; 12(1):17782. PubMed ID: 36273070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Environmental DNA metabarcoding: Transforming how we survey animal and plant communities.
Deiner K; Bik HM; Mächler E; Seymour M; Lacoursière-Roussel A; Altermatt F; Creer S; Bista I; Lodge DM; de Vere N; Pfrender ME; Bernatchez L
Mol Ecol; 2017 Nov; 26(21):5872-5895. PubMed ID: 28921802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A large scale temporal and spatial environmental DNA biodiversity survey of marine vertebrates in Brazil following the Fundão tailings dam failure.
Lines R; Juggernauth M; Peverley G; Keating J; Simpson T; Mousavi-Derazmahalleh M; Bunce M; Berry TE; Taysom A; Bernardino AF; Whittle P
Mar Environ Res; 2023 Nov; 192():106239. PubMed ID: 37926039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Toward an ecoregion scale evaluation of eDNA metabarcoding primers: A case study for the freshwater fish biodiversity of the Murray-Darling Basin (Australia).
Bylemans J; Gleeson DM; Hardy CM; Furlan E
Ecol Evol; 2018 Sep; 8(17):8697-8712. PubMed ID: 30271538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Environmental DNA Metabarcoding: A Novel Method for Biodiversity Monitoring of Marine Fish Communities.
Miya M
Ann Rev Mar Sci; 2022 Jan; 14():161-185. PubMed ID: 34351788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Environmental DNA metabarcoding of freshwater fish in Malaysian tropical rivers using short-read nanopore sequencing as a potential biomonitoring tool.
Munian K; Ramli FF; Othman N; Mahyudin NAA; Sariyati NH; Abdullah-Fauzi NAF; Haris H; Ilham-Norhakim ML; Abdul-Latiff MAB
Mol Ecol Resour; 2024 May; 24(4):e13936. PubMed ID: 38419264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessing the utility of marine filter feeders for environmental DNA (eDNA) biodiversity monitoring.
Jeunen GJ; Cane JS; Ferreira S; Strano F; von Ammon U; Cross H; Day R; Hesseltine S; Ellis K; Urban L; Pearson N; Olmedo-Rojas P; Kardailsky A; Gemmell NJ; Lamare M
Mol Ecol Resour; 2023 May; 23(4):771-786. PubMed ID: 36598115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An Environmental DNA Primer for Microbial and Restoration Ecology.
Tessler M; Cunningham SW; Ingala MR; Warring SD; Brugler MR
Microb Ecol; 2023 Apr; 85(3):796-808. PubMed ID: 36735064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Molecular identity crisis: environmental DNA metabarcoding meets traditional taxonomy-assessing biodiversity and freshwater mussel populations (Unionidae) in Alabama.
Hauck LL; Atkinson CL; Homyack JA; Penaluna BE; Mangum C; Coble AA; Nettles J; Thornton-Frost JE; Fix MJ
PeerJ; 2023; 11():e15127. PubMed ID: 37033728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Net overboard: Comparing marine eDNA sampling methodologies at sea to unravel marine biodiversity.
von Ammon U; Pochon X; Casanovas P; Trochel B; Zirngibl M; Thomas A; Witting J; Joyce P; Zaiko A
Mol Ecol Resour; 2023 Feb; 23(2):440-452. PubMed ID: 36226834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Environmental DNA metabarcoding of water samples as a tool for monitoring Iberian freshwater fish composition.
Corral-Lou A; Doadrio I
PLoS One; 2023; 18(10):e0283088. PubMed ID: 37903086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Unveiling biogeographical patterns of the ichthyofauna in the Tuichi basin, a biodiversity hotspot in the Bolivian Amazon, using environmental DNA.
Mariac C; Duponchelle F; Miranda G; Ramallo C; Wallace R; Tarifa G; Garcia-Davila C; Ortega H; Pinto J; Renno JF
PLoS One; 2022; 17(1):e0262357. PubMed ID: 34982802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of environmental DNA and bulk-sample metabarcoding using highly degenerate cytochrome c oxidase I primers.
Macher JN; Vivancos A; Piggott JJ; Centeno FC; Matthaei CD; Leese F
Mol Ecol Resour; 2018 Nov; 18(6):1456-1468. PubMed ID: 30129704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantitative environmental DNA metabarcoding shows high potential as a novel approach to quantitatively assess fish community.
Tsuji S; Inui R; Nakao R; Miyazono S; Saito M; Kono T; Akamatsu Y
Sci Rep; 2022 Dec; 12(1):21524. PubMed ID: 36513686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
