These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38822255)

  • 21. Comparison and validation of some ITS primer pairs useful for fungal metabarcoding studies.
    Op De Beeck M; Lievens B; Busschaert P; Declerck S; Vangronsveld J; Colpaert JV
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(6):e97629. PubMed ID: 24933453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Integrating invasive species risk assessment into environmental DNA metabarcoding reference libraries.
    Mahon AR; Grey EK; Jerde CL
    Ecol Appl; 2023 Jan; 33(1):e2730. PubMed ID: 36054696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Environmental DNA: The next chapter.
    Blackman R; Couton M; Keck F; Kirschner D; Carraro L; Cereghetti E; Perrelet K; Bossart R; Brantschen J; Zhang Y; Altermatt F
    Mol Ecol; 2024 Jun; 33(11):e17355. PubMed ID: 38624076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The challenge of implementing environmental DNA metabarcoding to detect elasmobranchs in a resource-limited marine protected area.
    Merten Cruz M; Sauvage T; Chariton A; de Freitas TRO
    J Fish Biol; 2023 Jul; 103(1):172-178. PubMed ID: 37060349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Passive eDNA sampling facilitates biodiversity monitoring and rare species detection.
    Chen X; Li S; Zhao J; Yao M
    Environ Int; 2024 May; 187():108706. PubMed ID: 38696978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. eDNA metabarcoding as a biomonitoring tool for marine protected areas.
    Gold Z; Sprague J; Kushner DJ; Zerecero Marin E; Barber PH
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(2):e0238557. PubMed ID: 33626067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding assays to detect invasive invertebrate species in the Great Lakes.
    Klymus KE; Marshall NT; Stepien CA
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0177643. PubMed ID: 28542313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Biodiversity and spatial distribution of ascidian using environmental DNA metabarcoding.
    Bae S; Kim P; Yi CH
    Mar Environ Res; 2023 Mar; 185():105893. PubMed ID: 36689844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Optimizing waterborne eDNA capture from waterholes in savanna systems under remote field conditions.
    Schenekar T; Baxter J; Phukuntsi MA; Sedlmayr I; Weckworth B; Mwale M
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2024 May; 24(4):e13942. PubMed ID: 38390664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Next-generation monitoring of aquatic biodiversity using environmental DNA metabarcoding.
    Valentini A; Taberlet P; Miaud C; Civade R; Herder J; Thomsen PF; Bellemain E; Besnard A; Coissac E; Boyer F; Gaboriaud C; Jean P; Poulet N; Roset N; Copp GH; Geniez P; Pont D; Argillier C; Baudoin JM; Peroux T; Crivelli AJ; Olivier A; Acqueberge M; Le Brun M; Møller PR; Willerslev E; Dejean T
    Mol Ecol; 2016 Feb; 25(4):929-42. PubMed ID: 26479867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Unveiling invasive insect threats to plant biodiversity: Leveraging eDNA metabarcoding and saturated salt trap solutions for biosurveillance.
    Milián-García Y; Pyne C; Lindsay K; Romero A; Hanner RH
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(8):e0290036. PubMed ID: 37566591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. An integrated spatio-temporal view of riverine biodiversity using environmental DNA metabarcoding.
    Perry WB; Seymour M; Orsini L; Jâms IB; Milner N; Edwards F; Harvey R; de Bruyn M; Bista I; Walsh K; Emmett B; Blackman R; Altermatt F; Lawson Handley L; Mächler E; Deiner K; Bik HM; Carvalho G; Colbourne J; Cosby BJ; Durance I; Creer S
    Nat Commun; 2024 May; 15(1):4372. PubMed ID: 38782932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Capturing open ocean biodiversity: Comparing environmental DNA metabarcoding to the continuous plankton recorder.
    Suter L; Polanowski AM; Clarke LJ; Kitchener JA; Deagle BE
    Mol Ecol; 2021 Jul; 30(13):3140-3157. PubMed ID: 32767849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. eDNA metabarcoding as a promising conservation tool for monitoring fish diversity in a coastal wetland of the Pearl River Estuary compared to bottom trawling.
    Zou K; Chen J; Ruan H; Li Z; Guo W; Li M; Liu L
    Sci Total Environ; 2020 Feb; 702():134704. PubMed ID: 31726353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. eDNA metabarcoding as a promising conservation tool to monitor fish diversity in Beijing water systems compared with ground cages.
    Shen M; Xiao N; Zhao Z; Guo N; Luo Z; Sun G; Li J
    Sci Rep; 2022 Jun; 12(1):11113. PubMed ID: 35773335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comprehensive biodiversity analysis via ultra-deep patterned flow cell technology: a case study of eDNA metabarcoding seawater.
    Singer GAC; Fahner NA; Barnes JG; McCarthy A; Hajibabaei M
    Sci Rep; 2019 Apr; 9(1):5991. PubMed ID: 30979963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Assessing without harvesting: Pros and cons of environmental DNA sampling and image analysis for marine biodiversity evaluation.
    Kopp D; Faillettaz R; Le Joncour A; Simon J; Morandeau F; Le Bourdonnec P; Bouché L; Méhault S
    Mar Environ Res; 2023 Jun; 188():106004. PubMed ID: 37127004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Merging two eDNA metabarcoding approaches and citizen-science-based sampling to facilitate fish community monitoring along vast Sub-Saharan coastlines.
    Burian A; Bruce K; Tovela E; Bakker J; Balcells L; Bennett R; Chordekar S; Costa HM; Crampton-Platt A; de Boer H; Ross-Gillespie V; de Sacramento A; Sidat N; Simbine L; Ready J; Tang C; Mauvisseau Q
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2023 Oct; 23(7):1641-1655. PubMed ID: 37464467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Monitoring of multiple fish species by quantitative environmental DNA metabarcoding surveys over two summer seasons.
    Wu L; Osugi T; Inagawa T; Okitsu J; Sakamoto S; Minamoto T
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2024 Jan; 24(1):e13875. PubMed ID: 37830396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The importance of molecular markers and primer design when characterizing biodiversity from environmental DNA.
    Freeland JR
    Genome; 2017 Apr; 60(4):358-374. PubMed ID: 28177833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.