These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38823082)

  • 1. Law compliance decision making for autonomous vehicles on highways.
    Ma X; Song L; Zhao C; Wu S; Yu W; Wang W; Yang L; Wang H
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Sep; 204():107620. PubMed ID: 38823082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Trajectory planning framework for autonomous vehicles based on collision injury prediction for vulnerable road users.
    Guo Y; Liu Y; Wang B; Huang P; Xu H; Bai Z
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Aug; 203():107610. PubMed ID: 38749269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Detection and Risk Analysis with Lane-Changing Decision Algorithms for Autonomous Vehicles.
    Mechernene A; Judalet V; Chaibet A; Boukhnifer M
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Oct; 22(21):. PubMed ID: 36365846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Collision-avoidance lane change control method for enhancing safety for connected vehicle platoon in mixed traffic environment.
    Ma Y; Liu Q; Fu J; Liufu K; Li Q
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 May; 184():106999. PubMed ID: 36780868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Research on Lane Changing Game and Behavioral Decision Making Based on Driving Styles and Micro-Interaction Behaviors.
    Ye M; Li P; Yang Z; Liu Y
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Sep; 22(18):. PubMed ID: 36146081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Human-Like Lane Change Decision Model for Autonomous Vehicles that Considers the Risk Perception of Drivers in Mixed Traffic.
    Wang C; Sun Q; Li Z; Zhang H
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Apr; 20(8):. PubMed ID: 32316210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A co-evolutionary lane-changing trajectory planning method for automated vehicles based on the instantaneous risk identification.
    Wu J; Chen X; Bie Y; Zhou W
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Feb; 180():106907. PubMed ID: 36455450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Safety assessment for autonomous vehicles: A reference driver model for highway merging scenarios.
    Wang C; Guo F; Zhao S; Zhu Z; Zhang Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Oct; 206():107710. PubMed ID: 39018627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Human-like Decision Making for Autonomous Vehicles at the Intersection Using Inverse Reinforcement Learning.
    Wu Z; Qu F; Yang L; Gong J
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Jun; 22(12):. PubMed ID: 35746281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How Do Autonomous Vehicles Decide?
    Malik S; Khan MA; El-Sayed H; Khan J; Ullah O
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Dec; 23(1):. PubMed ID: 36616915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A dynamic test scenario generation method for autonomous vehicles based on conditional generative adversarial imitation learning.
    Jia L; Yang D; Ren Y; Qian C; Feng Q; Sun B; Wang Z
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Jan; 194():107279. PubMed ID: 37897956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does assisted driving behavior lead to safety-critical encounters with unequipped vehicles' drivers?
    Preuk K; Stemmler E; Schießl C; Jipp M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Oct; 95(Pt A):149-56. PubMed ID: 27442594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysis of Lane-Changing Decision-Making Behavior of Autonomous Vehicles Based on Molecular Dynamics.
    Qu D; Zhang K; Song H; Wang T; Dai S
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Oct; 22(20):. PubMed ID: 36298099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Overtaking maneuvers on two-lane highways under the microscope: Exploration of a multidimensional framework for the analysis of safety, comfort and efficiency using simulator data.
    Zhang R; Qiong B; Brijs K; Hermans E; Qu Q; Shen Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Jul; 202():107613. PubMed ID: 38705109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A safety score for the assessment of driving style.
    Schöner HP; Pretto P; Sodnik J; Kaluza B; Komavec M; Varesanovic D; Chouchane H; Antona-Makoshi J
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2021; 22(5):384-389. PubMed ID: 33881358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A visual approach towards forward collision warning for autonomous vehicles on Malaysian public roads.
    Wong MK; Connie T; Goh MKO; Wong LP; Teh PS; Choo AL
    F1000Res; 2021; 10():928. PubMed ID: 35350706
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An integrated architecture for intelligence evaluation of automated vehicles.
    Huang H; Zheng X; Yang Y; Liu J; Liu W; Wang J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Sep; 145():105681. PubMed ID: 32712190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effectiveness and driver acceptance of a semi-autonomous forward obstacle collision avoidance system.
    Itoh M; Horikome T; Inagaki T
    Appl Ergon; 2013 Sep; 44(5):756-63. PubMed ID: 23453775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Autonomous driving testing scenario generation based on in-depth vehicle-to-powered two-wheeler crash data in China.
    Wang X; Peng Y; Xu T; Xu Q; Wu X; Xiang G; Yi S; Wang H
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Oct; 176():106812. PubMed ID: 36054982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ethical Decision-Making for Self-Driving Vehicles: A Proposed Model & List of Value-Laden Terms that Warrant (Technical) Specification.
    Poszler F; Geisslinger M; Lütge C
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2024 Oct; 30(5):47. PubMed ID: 39387983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.